- #1
Thread Owner
“An armed lunatic has stormed a gun range and killed 20 NRA members.”
Yeah, but I think you miss the point.I'm not trying to pick a fight, but didn't that brave, honorable marine and his friend get shot to death at a gun range?
Yeah, but I think you miss the point.
Dano Sverige said:As i say to you all the time TH...it's all well and good IF you/they know it's coming!
I can easily envisage a scenario of 20 NRA members at the range...they have guns...they're shooting at the targets....i'm 20ft behind them with my little AR-15 with 30 round mag. Would my bangs be any different than their bangs? When 1 guy goes down backshot in his little booth would the next guy realise? How many could i pop before someone happened to turn around? How long before he realised why i was standing there and what i'd done? Did he turn around only because he was out of ammo?......BANG!....and move on!
Never say "never" mate.
As i say to you all the time TH...it's all well and good IF you/they know it's coming!
I can easily envisage a scenario of 20 NRA members at the range...they have guns...they're shooting at the targets....i'm 20ft behind them with my little AR-15 with 30 round mag. Would my bangs be any different than their bangs? When 1 guy goes down backshot in his little booth would the next guy realise? How many could i pop before someone happened to turn around? How long before he realised why i was standing there and what i'd done? Did he turn around only because he was out of ammo?......BANG!....and move on!
Never say "never" mate.
People aren't as 'stupid' as you think they are,those that are aware of their environment will make it,can't say that much for you though,oh well,tried to warn you.
My point is that murder can happen anywhere. Let us all pray this theoretical situation never gets tested. Of course, what would the NRA response be then? "Put armed guards in front of all shooting ranges?"
No, they would suggest its safer for the law abiding NRA members to be unarmed so the criminal wouldn't be harmed, and could take his time while killing them. Wait...perhaps that's the more liberal "I'm a victim" position.
Ummm, that did not make a whole lot of sense. Can you rephrase it in a more logical counterpoint? Otherwise, it will be difficult for me to continue what had previously been an intelligent conversation.
Crispin
Thank you for suggesting I'm not intelligent enough for this conversation. Appreciate it.
You brought up the nonsensical "...would the NRA response be then? "Put armed guards in front of all shooting ranges?"
I mocked your ridiculous post by suggesting that the NRA response would be to fix the problem by disarming the NRA members at the range so the criminal/shooter wouldn't be harmed, and so the shooter could take his time killing the innocent people. I then stated that I was mistaken, and this was actually the how liberal "victims" advocate dealing with mass shooters.
Does that work, or am I still too stupid to warrant your time?