Here's a question for you TT. Imagine in a parallel universe we arranged a trip to a country with a less than salubrious record in dealing with antiquities. We greased the right palms, got the necessary pieces of paper with the necessary stamps and organised a dig or two. After many years of sweat, tears, hope, frustration, aims and aspirations, you finally uncover something of value.
Would you:
Tell the local authorities, clearly knowing they'll confiscate on spurious grounds and it'll end up in some official's private collection?
Would you try and get it to a western museum who'll probably report you for 'smuggling'?
Would you try and sell it at the earliest opportunity?
Or none of the above?
I'll understand if you'd rather keep the answer private.
This is the sort of situation one can so easily find themselves in, even today....
IP
IPU...thanks for these points,,actually it is good to discuss such things hypothetically as sooner or later we might face them for real...
--for the first question,,,my strategy would be to assess beforehand the track record of that country and rate it from 1-10 just as investors rate countries on different parameters...in some countries where they have good reward package for finders and there has been a good record of actual rewards,I could go on to tell about the find...otherwise i devise another strategy..
---smuggling it out to another country to another museum I guess is dangerous ,,,
---locally selling on black market,though less dangerous than taking it out to another country,it could also be problematic if you are caught...
Though I can not say exactly now what I would do in such situations if it happens...my overall strategy in problematic countries would be not to disclose the find , but to just leave it hidden and concealed and just document the find with gps and map infos, photos, videos including myself in it to make it convincing(so that people dont think it is photo shopped) .Then I leave the country and contact the foriegn office and other relevant gov ministry of that country of my find and that I am giving them the chance to come up with an attractive offer in order to have the location info( i show them the pics and videos)...to put pressure I would inform some medias as well...if they give in, then I would go on to disclose it having the necessary legal signing and other measures etc in place ....if they would not be willing to entertain my story ,I would approach an international corporate company or entity that work on such kind of finds and try to sell to them the info and walk away from the whole thing..that international company would deal with the government and the government officials can not easily mess up with that big company as they can drag them to international courts...so this is my 'soft treasure hunting' that I mentioned before...But if my rating of that country is good I would disclose the find and benefit from the law they have for finders...
does this make sense?

,,,
but mind you some finds are easy to apply my approach like treasure finds in caves which u can handle alone without other people...but if u are digging, then definitely there are local people helping u and things would not be easy to keep hidden...also even if u want to take it out of the country or sell it ,those locals will talk of the find and create problems on u...hence buried treasure that requires a lot of digging involving locals has complications...hidden treasure caches like in secret caves is far better...that is why as a one man band i probably want to specialize on cave and tunnel based hidden treasures ...like forgotten pirate caches and other concealed treasures in forgotten tunnels ,dungeons , old structures etc that do not need much digging
TT