Frank,
You know I luv'ya babe, but you are absolutely mistaken on this one. I contacted both Phil Reinhart and and Greg Davis. Both have been with the Museum for many years, and both are in the perfect positions to answer the question. This is what I was told via email:
My Email:
Good Afternoon,
Hope this finds you well and happy!
Someone just told me that the Stone Maps on display at the SMHS Museum are not the originals any more. Is that true?
Thanks in advance - Mike
Answer:
Good afternoon Mike: I do not know who told you that but it is not true. The original Stone Maps received by us from the Flagg Foundation are still on display at the Museum.
If Greg Davis says that to me in no uncertain terms and without any equivocation, it would take some serious evidence to convince me otherwise!
I was also there in June of 2010. I got there long before opening. Greg and Phil kindly allowed me some private time with all the Stone Maps before we took them out to publicly display them. I got a closer look at them than the DAI (Desert Archaeology Inc) People did for the Arizona Highways Article. The people at DAI only did a cursory examination of the Stone Maps. I spoke with two of the people that examined them, and was told that they only spent a couple of hours with them. I was allowed to use a digital microscope and photograph them under different types of lights I brought (Blue-White LED, Blacklight, and InfraRed).
In the time I spent with the Stone Maps, I could find ABSOLUTELY NOTHING that the DAI Folks said was modern that could not easily be done just as well with hand tools. For example: They say the start spot in the drill hole is indicative of an electric drill. REALLY? Using a hand drill, I would drill a small hole and enlarge it. My starting dimple would probably look just like the ones in my pics.
They also said that the surfaces were machine sanded smooth. Not so much! Beginning in ancient times, all they would do is get two slabs fairly even. Place some fine sand between the slabs, and slide them back and forth to smooth the surfaces. Finer sand for a smoother surface. I saw absolutely no evidence of machine sanding. When I asked the DAI Folks I spoke to about my findings, all they could offer was that it was possible that I was correct, but their opinion was their opinion. Agree to disagree.
Superdad,
You are coming to an awful lot of specific conclusions based on very circumstantial evidence. What I mean is that you speak in absolutes about your theory, when there is nothing definite to back up those assertions.
I don't say you are wrong. Your theories are just as valid as anybody else's, since nobody has gotten wealthy (to my knowledge) from their decryptions of the Stone Maps. I just have a problem with people saying they know 100% that everybody else is wrong, and you have gotten it right with no possibility of error.
Also, why go with Pedro Peralta? The name "MIGUEL" is also chiseled into the top of the Horse/Priest Stone:
Mike