Does this point look promising to have authenticated or is it a modern reproduction
Attachments
Upvote
6
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah I realized what I said when it was to late I meant it not porous like your more traditional flintAgate is a type of flint and is chert or quartz. Usually considered as Chalcedony it is still a type of flint, chert, quartz.
The biface Todd pictured looks more traditional with that dull surfaceYeah I realized what I said when it was to late I meant it not porous like your more traditional flint
Mexican in backwoods villages make reproduction high value "Mayan" ceramics, using common stuff old they dug, grinding them up and putting them in the right base clay...evidently it does something to help "authenticate" ageing.It wasn't an auction it was at an estate sale in a box of megalodon teeth it was wrapped in an old deteriorating newspaper from the 1958
Yes, a COA from T&T, Jeff Baker, Insight, or Bannerstone Tom is not worth wiping your a$$ with. That is a fake & not a good one. Every point this seller has posted is a fake. These are the usual COA's you find included with the fake Ebay stuff. These types of people have ruined this hobby.346 clovis listings on ebay right now, this one even has an COA
View attachment 2184155bottom line, if you didn't find it yourself, it aint real
[/URL]
Everything is faked and has been since ancient times. Indian artifacts chipped from flint were pretty much exempt from fraud for quite a while. No one knew how to chip. A few academics took up knapping in the 60s. When it turned into a hobby for amateurs in the early 80s the fraud really blossomed. I credit D.C.Waldorf for single-handedly inventing a new hobby that exploded. There are now thousands of knappers making millions of points. I’m now seeing some very good knapping and material coming from India. They’re even getting in on it.There are so so many artifact fraudsters, some even go as far as using acid to try to fake patina on indian artifacts. People have to look for the red flags if someone is a buyer.
IMO if you must rely on a COA for a relic, don't.Yes, a COA from T&T, Jeff Baker, Insight, or Bannerstone Tom is not worth wiping your a$$ with. That is a fake & not a good one. Every point this seller has posted is a fake. These types of people have ruined this hobby.