Not Peralta
Bronze Member
- Mar 23, 2013
- 2,167
- 3,064
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Amigo, thanks,For you.np
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------What crimes are you accusing these miners of having committed? Removing rock? Did you witness any illegal activities? I did not. We have NO idea who or whom left behind the junk etc. Let us not start making accusations okay? What is it really that you wish them to be punished for? Would you like someone to be trying to make legal troubles for you, if you had some success treasure hunting? Can you see why treasure hunters don't want to talk about their successes, when there are people that just want to make trouble for them?
EarnieP;5014448 Don't let paranoia blind you to the fact that not all hands coming at you are hostile said:Paranoia? Perhaps I did misread your intended point, as it was posted right after I had posted about a Statute of Limitations which would almost certainly mean any "crimes" committed, can no longer be prosecuted.
Old, what makes a PRE-Anglo mine worth protection as a 'historical monument'? Are not the Anglo mines just as important, historically, perhaps even more so? On the other hand, the mine still exists, you can hike up and look at it now, it is rather difficult to erase mines but of course our USFS has been doing it, including dynamiting shut mine tunnels to keep people out. This also means that the mines can no longer be used by bats, mountain lions, bears etc as habitat.
For that matter, what exactly makes the Pit mine a Pre-Anglo mine? The timbers? People still use rough timbers, it is not possible to say that proves it is Mexican or Spanish, and mining technology has not much changed over the centuries in that aspect. In fact the fact that you see timbers inside the Pit mine, actually make it more likely that it is an Anglo mine, for most Mexican and Spanish mines had very little, if any timbering. Not a matter of being lazy, just economics and somewhat less concern about safety of mine workers.
Of course I am quite biased, being a treasure hunter and prospector, but I would like to see what makes this Pit mine SO historically significant, that it should be preserved as some kind of national monument, beyond the fact that it already IS protected by law. And what makes it a pre-Anglo mine for that matter. I suspect that perhaps people are assigning a much higher value for tourists to look at old mines, than is warranted? There are in fact, old mines which are set up for tourists to come look at, photograph, ride ore carts down inside, even in some cases, buy small ore specimens. One example is an underground coal mine in Scranton PA. It is very definitely an historic mine, and coal really built the cities there. Yet very few visitors are interested in visiting the mine and the city considers shutting it down annually. Here in SD, we have the historic Homestake mine, the largest gold producer in US history, and they have tours of the mine. It does not get anywhere near the level of interest that nearby Deadwood does, for all the notoriety and gambling seems to have a stronger magnetic pull for tourists. This may not seem fair, but not that many people are that interested in old mines, as I have heard tourists say, "it is just a hole in the ground". And we already have a number of old 'historic' mines available for tourists to view - why do we need more? Thanks in advance.
Oroblanco
Last part first, no the book did not come from me, which proves you have many friends and now will have to guess which one sent the gift!
The first part, yes it does to me, especially when you consider that description you are citing, was written in 1884, long before the mine was abandoned. I have been looking for a later description as I have seen one which is very close to what has been described as the Pit mine. I have an earlier description as well, which only states that it looks "promising" and "much work" is being done, with no explanation about what work they were starting to do. Like most mining camps, work proceeded in fits and starts, with stops and gaps too. The main pit shaft is now well over 100 feet deep, and Waltz's mine was not supposed to be more than a dozen feet deep at most. This would mean either someone else found it and mined out a LOT of ore, or they are not one and the same. But what would I know, I have never even visited the Pit mine or Silver Chief. As it is, I only get a limited amount of time to spend in AZ per year, and have other things to spend it on, than a rather difficult hike to try to make a point in an internet discussion. Besides, what ever I might say, would not be believed unless it is backed up by a published source.
EarnieP wrote
What crimes are you accusing these miners of having committed? Removing rock? Did you witness any illegal activities? I did not. We have NO idea who or whom left behind the junk etc. Let us not start making accusations okay? What is it really that you wish them to be punished for? Would you like someone to be trying to make legal troubles for you, if you had some success treasure hunting? Can you see why treasure hunters don't want to talk about their successes, when there are people that just want to make trouble for them?
I have some relevant tidbits on this topic, don't have the time to post them tonight and not intended to prove or disprove anything, just interesting for anyone that may have an interest in the Rogers/Randolph district and the Silver Chief mine.
OK I will try again, dont know why there's no like button.
Amigo's and Amigo-ettes,, One thing I want you to be aware of is the information that travels from assays, many assayers share information on assays, corporations and groups and individuals have been buying info for years on your assays, most cases they will get the info before you do, If you take good material in to have it assayed,and if the assay shows its really good, you can bet other people are aware of it before you are. Money talks, nothing is sacred. np
thank you,I was only reporting what was told to me ,not trying to like my own post,again thank you.npthere is No like Button to see on your Own Posts .
it is the same for Everyone.
You shouldn't be Liking your Own Posts anyway
If you don't see a like on Someone Else's post. Hit Refresh.
Yes, And they tasted sooooooooooooooo good,hmmmmmmmmmmm.NPhe is too Jeff, he's a masochist, likes to suffer through a few of his own posts every so often. Now stuffing his cavernois tummy with fajitas.
Good day Oro,
My ideal outcome wouldn't be a tourist destination. It would be more in the form of documentation of what existed, who did it and when. Pictures and narrative in book form would be enough.
The actual site is probably too remote to attract a steady stream of tourist. I do think the area should be protected and it should receive its designation as a historic site. Those hardy enough to make the trip would be rewarded with at least a rest stop with a bronze plaque.
Why do you think I mourn the discarding of the timber? Keeping a four foot section for dating purposes and display in an exhibit wouldn't have required much in the way of cash outlay. It would have at least provided opportunity to validate the very questions you ask. I'm betting a graduate student (or two) at ASU would have given their eye teeth for the opportunity to work on such a project.
I don't need convincing. But it would have been convincing to skeptics.
But hey, remember I'm from Virginia. We are head over heels in love with history and treat it will reverence. At least we did. Times are changing, alas. The all too true joke around these parts is how many Virginians does it take to screw in a light blub. Answer: 5. One to screw in the blub and 4 to document the historic valve of the old blub. That's more truth than joke.
There are many people, especially in government affairs, that will say with a straight face that NO Spanish mining ever took place in the Wilderness area. That's just not true.