Field Results from The Sho-Nuff Test

[aarthrj3811]

A very good report LT

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Upgraded Night Vision Monocular Digital Infrared Monocular Telescope for 100% Darkness with 8X Zoom - Grab it through Amazon!

[EE THr]

A very good report LT

Speaking of reports, con-artie, you haven't said how your 30 people are to be tested.

Do you want all 30 to search for 30 targets all at once?

Or just one target, one at a time?

Or how do you want to work that?

 

[aarthrj3811]

To prove that objects emit energy or a signal is simple. Use a quart jar. Take some liquid rubber and dab it onto the center of the lid. Pull it away from the lid to create a thin string that looks like the strand of a spider web. This is the hardest part of the test. Attach a 1/2 inch Alum foil disk to the rubber strand. Screw the lid on the jar.

Place a protractor on the table with the 90 degree mark pointing to north. Set the jar on the protractor and alien the disk in a north south direction. Place a gold nugget beside the jar on the 0 degree mark of the protractor and wait for the disk to turn. Now try placing other objects by the jar one at a time. I found that a slice of onion gave off the strongest signal of anything that I tried.

What turned the disk? I can only conclude that objects emit energy.....Art

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HIO EE, you posted --> I didn't see any boo boos about electronics made by SWR. What, in particular, are you talking about?

And speaking of boo boos about electronics, I don't think you are one to talk
**************
Part A) yer kidding??

Part B) yer right, still, if he can fake it, why can't I?

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

HIO EE, you posted --> I didn't see any boo boos about electronics made by SWR. What, in particular, are you talking about?

And speaking of boo boos about electronics, I don't think you are one to talk
**************
Part A) yer kidding??

Part B) yer right, still, if he can fake it, why can't I?

Don Jose de La Mancha

You responded to the comment, but you didn't answer the question part.

 

[EE THr]

I haven't heard any more of the sho-nuff test---what happened?

fenix brothers reported a 70% success rate with the coathangers, and LRLs are supposed to be significantly better, so that would be at lease 80% success rate for them.

And Carl's test only requires 70% to pass---so any LRL should be a sure winner, right?

Carl will have to hold back the crowds. People will be buying LRLs just to take his test!

Right?

I'm waiting to hear the rumble and roar of the stampede of people!

Waiting...waiting.... How come I don't hear anything?

 

[fenixdigger]

I think I'll and a twist to this. I'm going to have the subject try it without the sample to have a dowsing baseline.

Keep in mind the ones I am testing for the most part have never tried anything like this before and I will try a few kids also.

 

[fenixdigger]

Thanks Judy. I am going to have subjects try it before I put the sample down as a control and a test of dowsing at the same time.

Kids love to play with this.

Consider this a tri-cycle. The latest developments are a Ferrari. May need to go to crash helmets and roll bars.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

boy howdy....LRL proponents are clamoring now to prove coat hangers replicate the "electronics" in Long Range Locators. Even non-LRL users are bending there coat hangers in participation of this DOWSING test

Looks like the Sho-Nuff Test test is working according to you..the more people that participate the more will understand them difference between a set of Dowsing Rods and a set of Rods used by a LRL..
After all the little ten minute test will tell them more than 100’s of posts. But of course you are upset as when they use rods rods and are able to tell the difference between a natural signal and a man made signal 1000 ’of you’re your posts become obsolete.….They are just doing what you claim they should do..Become smart consumers..Thank for all the help..
Art

 

[hung]

They are just doing what you claim they should do..Become smart consumers..Thank for all the help..
Art

"Long Range Detector for Gold is our perfect tool for treasure hunting. I spent more time airborne than in my seat as the 4 wheel drive pickup popcorned across the rocks, potholes, washes and gravel roads. I had started tracking the signal from 12 miles away. All prelude tests showed that I had a bona fided, refined, gold target. I triangulated by driving at right angles to find the distance and direction. I crossed three mountain ridges, valleys and sides before finally arriving at a non-descript open plane. I couldn’t help but but think, “What a poor choice to bury a treasure, why there are no markers, signs, symbols or any place to put them!”

Stepping out of the truck, I began to “Walk out” the signal… twelve miles from my original “setup” point as a crow flies and 53 yards from the pickup, I announced, “Its here! Just 3 1/2 feet deep!” The Long Range Detector for Gold worked again! This cache has been written about, hypothesized, lied about and overlooked for at least 88 years. The digging of rocks and roots finally gave way to the prize! The gold gleamed in the afternoon sun as it saw the light of day for the first time in scores of years. The sand clung to the bars wrapped in red cloth. (Any dowser would have asked how we overcame the color red?)

This wasn’t in a foreign country or hundreds of miles from nowhere. This story came from the call of a rancher who had a hunch about a certain treasure story (later we found out he was considering selling the ranch and wanted to make sure he wasn’t leaving the treasure behind!). The treasure was in the ranchers’ pasture, within sight of a nearby town, USA."

-anonymous-

 

[EE THr]

They are just doing what you claim they should do..Become smart consumers..Thank for all the help..
Art

"Long Range Detector for Gold is our perfect tool for treasure hunting. I spent more time airborne than in my seat as the 4 wheel drive pickup popcorned across the rocks, potholes, washes and gravel roads. I had started tracking the signal from 12 miles away. All prelude tests showed that I had a bona fided, refined, gold target. I triangulated by driving at right angles to find the distance and direction. I crossed three mountain ridges, valleys and sides before finally arriving at a non-descript open plane. I couldn’t help but but think, “What a poor choice to bury a treasure, why there are no markers, signs, symbols or any place to put them!”

Stepping out of the truck, I began to “Walk out” the signal… twelve miles from my original “setup” point as a crow flies and 53 yards from the pickup, I announced, “Its here! Just 3 1/2 feet deep!” The Long Range Detector for Gold worked again! This cache has been written about, hypothesized, lied about and overlooked for at least 88 years. The digging of rocks and roots finally gave way to the prize! The gold gleamed in the afternoon sun as it saw the light of day for the first time in scores of years. The sand clung to the bars wrapped in red cloth. (Any dowser would have asked how we overcame the color red?)

This wasn’t in a foreign country or hundreds of miles from nowhere. This story came from the call of a rancher who had a hunch about a certain treasure story (later we found out he was considering selling the ranch and wanted to make sure he wasn’t leaving the treasure behind!). The treasure was in the ranchers’ pasture, within sight of a nearby town, USA."

-anonymous-

Yes! I remember this story, from a few years ago!

This rancher is the same guy who bred his cows with mountain goats, so they could get from the barn to pasture easier. Who could forget that. Wow this guy was what ranching is all about!

"I crossed three mountain ridges, valleys and sides before finally arriving at a non-descript open plane....The treasure was in the ranchers’ pasture, within sight of a nearby town, USA."

Pictures of the cow-goats were in all the papers. Of course!

Jeez, hung-up, when you explain things, it all comes together and makes so much sense!

I guess you just have a certain Knack for that.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

maybe they had to take a time-out to purchase more coathangers coat hangers

In case you don’t know that Metal cost hangers can still be found for free at places where the people wear uniforms.

boy howdy....LRL proponents are clamoring now to prove coat hangers replicate the "electronics" in Long Range Locators. Even non-LRL users are bending there coat hangers in participation of this DOWSING test

I see you still do not understand what we are discussing
Good post hung..Art

 

[EE THr]

I have offered a simple inexpensive experiment as a basic test to enable someone to comprehend answers about LRL use.

It is as follows; Place a silver quarter on the ground (sample). Put 1 silver quarter and 4 steel washers in separate paper towels that you wad up and then mix them up. Throw them on the ground 25 ft or so around the sample. Take your coat hanger L Rod (17 x 5 inches) and walk around the sample clockwise 6 ft from the sample. SLOWLY, with the rod held slightly down.

Watch for any movement. If you get a reaction, stop, back up and slowly move forward to verify it. Check the results and post them here.

I will post the results of my personal test after I do this with 5 other people. I will post their results first.

As it uses a "bait" or "sample" I do not consider this "dowsing" more like a non electrical LRL.

If the instructions are not clear enough or too complicated for an attempt, ask for clarification.

Fenix, you may need to mention that the only real "silver" quarters to be used for your test would have to be
pre-1965 issue. Some may not be aware of that and mistakenly use any 'ole quarters...then the results would
be invalid.


I just finished running 3 sets of 5 base attempts using your methodology, today.

My results were as follows:

1 a.m. - 5 attempts / 4 correct

9 a.m. - 5 attempts / 3 correct

5 p.m. - 5 attempts / 3 correct


This is very interesting, can't wait to see others from the forum post their results. Am waiting to see the "tie-in" with anticipation.

Aw, Big J, you only scored about 67%. Three more percentage points and you can pass Carl's test, and pick up a cool $25,000.00. Keep trying.

Wait! I got it! Go to Radio Shack and buy any cheap transistor, and hot-glue it to one of the coat-hangers. Now you've got an LRL that's just as good as any on the market!

And, since LRLs work better than dowsing, you can now pass the big test!

Get a big tablet and a pencil, so you can make a list of all the stuff you will be getting with that prize money!

 

[fenixdigger]

What's the odds that we are getting a lot of nonsensical, hateful, off topic posts rather than any results? I'll fathom a guess.

Didn't someone whine about that same thing? Nah, couldn't be.

Or could it?---SHO-NUFF

 

[EE THr]

What's the odds that we are getting a lot of nonsensical, hateful, off topic posts rather than any results? I'll fathom a guess.

Didn't someone whine about that same thing? Nah, couldn't be.

Or could it?---SHO-NUFF

Show me the personal insult?

Did I call someone a name?

Did I say sombody was crazy?

I merely commented on the data.

What's wrong with that?

 

[fenixdigger]

Just for dessert, I'll add some other LRLs to this little experiment. It will be next week before I am near the E-Scope 301 and the Anderson Rod.

 

[EE THr]

Just for dessert, I'll add some other LRLs to this little experiment. It will be next week before I am near the E-Scope 301 and the Anderson Rod.

This looks like an excellent opportunity for me to make another prediction!


I predict you won't post the average succes rate results, claiming that you can't because they are Top Secret.

But you will expound on how awsome the results were. Ho-hum....Heard that before!






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Saturna]

I'd say that's a pretty safe prediction.

 

[fenixdigger]

Sat; If you were talking to me, it's not really a prediction just an extension of the previous 10,000 posts. If you weren't, It still stands. Nothing will satisfy, insults, demands, and a whole lot of transference. SHO-NUFF

PS; I see you haven't had the time or quarters to see if this is true.

 

[EE THr]

Sat; If you were talking to me, it's not really a prediction just an extension of the previous 10,000 posts. If you weren't, It still stands. Nothing will satisfy, insults, demands, and a whole lot of transference. SHO-NUFF

PS; I see you haven't had the time or quarters to see if this is true.

He has us on Ignore, but he knows what we are saying.

Is kind of like a kid with an imaginary friend?

Something just seems a little bit "space cadet-ish" to me. Wow.

What next? Will he be talking to thousands of people following him on twitter, who really don't?

Amazing!