Field Results from The Sho-Nuff Test

[aarthrj3811]

SWR simply pointed out the inconsistencies in your post. You made a lier out of yourself....that's in your post, for everybody to see

Still waiting for you to validate your claims. We've already supplied evidence that calculators, empty plastic boxes and plastic boxes with rat wiring cannot transmit usable signals.

The solution would be for you to validate your claims. That would be an easy process if the content you provided where truthful and factual. However, as seen many times....that does not happen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_United_States_law
Hearsay is the legal term that describes statements made outside of court or other judicial proceedings. Unless one of about thirty[1] exceptions applies, hearsay is not allowed as evidence in the United States. The Hearsay Rule is an analytic rule of evidence that defines hearsay and provides for both exceptions and exemptions from that rule. There is no all-encompassing definition of hearsay in the United States. However, most evidentiary codes defining hearsay adopt verbatim the rule as laid out in the Federal Rules of Evidence, which generally defines hearsay as a "statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted."[2] Historically, the rule against hearsay is aimed at prohibiting the use of a person's assertion, as equivalent to testimony to the fact asserted, unless the assertor is brought to testify in court where he may be placed under oath and cross-examined.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Treasure of Victoria Peak - Grab it through Amazon!

[fenixdigger]

We went out yesterday and set this up. I didn't have any washers so I used a silver 50 cent and 4 20d gold.

These were wrapped in paper towel and taped. I turned around while they were put out and then after 5 mins walked between them.
I did this 3 times before the wind got too gusty to try. I'm going to do it again as the results seem too good to be true.

Even the neighbor had a higher result that I thought possible. We should get a chance to do this tomorrow. I'll use washers next time.

 

[Saturna]

We went out yesterday and set this up. I didn't have any washers so I used a silver 50 cent and 4 20d gold.

These were wrapped in paper towel and taped. I turned around while they were put out and then after 5 mins walked between them.
I did this 3 times before the wind got too gusty to try. I'm going to do it again as the results seem too good to be true.

Even the neighbor had a higher result that I thought possible. We should get a chance to do this tomorrow. I'll use washers next time.

Then do the same thing in front of Randi, and make $1,000,000.

 

[aarthrj3811]

Then do the same thing in front of Randi, and make $1,000,000.

Whan does Randi shoot his next informational movie ?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

Good morning swr you posted --> Please validate your claim, or include a disclaimer that this
is strictly your opinion
*********
?? obviously you haven't been keeping your homework up to date. sigh.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI sater: you posted -->Then do the same thing in front of Randi, and make $1,000,000
*********
yer as big a joke as randi is to say that. He would be out of business once someone even
rocked the bed a bit, sooo, don't you believe that he has built in safeguards?.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

Going to go slow again. Guys I have you on ignore . Now , I'm not going to reply , even when

someone quotes you. You say nothing worth hearing, and don't understand enough

to try to deal with.

Ummmmmmm. fenix brothers----

Nobody quoted us.

So, if you have us on Ignore, how do you know what we are saying, and why does it bother you.


Obviously, you do not have us on Ignore.

What would any of us care if you did, anyway?


But you don't.

So you are playing another game with yourself.

Is this a new version of your, "Look everybody, I'm talking to the air"?


...And you're trying to say other people have mental problem?

Woooooooooooooow!





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?[/

 

[fenixdigger]

Sat;

If I thought it was legit, I would consider it. I still don't have this to the point of betting the farm on it. We have been doing extensive experiments for the last 3 months and got some blinding results. Most by accident when we weren't expecting it.

Now, I'm willing to share some of it, but not to people that constantly hateful and have no interest in it anyway. this has been a joint effort of people I hunt with and ones all over the country that work with me to experiment with different procedures.

The problems have not been the devices, but the correct procedures to overcome the anomalies that reduce the % of good finds.

We had a discussion with Carl about finding a target in a 1,000 acre field. I tried his experiment about random chance and found in a field, it had 0%. Going straight to a target (not the one I wanted) and being within 3 inches of it, I scanned a circle of over 50 ft around it and nothing.

So the problem of truly eliminating targets who's signature close to the real target was catching us, became #1 on the list.

The next hunt should happen in 2 weeks. That will tell the tale as what happens in the yard does not always work in the field.

 

[fenixdigger]

I guess I should include this even at this point.

When I went to check out the Bionic 01, I took a signal gen., Examiner, a modified Electo-Scope, 2 oz gold sample, and L Rods.

All 4 of mine locked 4 targets from 3 different setups. One procedure used the sample and the rods, just like this experiment.

The 4th signal (the bionic 01 did not get) appeared to be over 20 miles away. I would say that qualifys as a long range locator.

 

[EE THr]

I guess I should include this even at this point.

When I went to check out the Bionic 01, I took a signal gen., Examiner, a modified Electo-Scope, 2 oz gold sample, and L Rods.

All 4 of mine locked 4 targets from 3 different setups. One procedure used the sample and the rods, just like this experiment.

The 4th signal (the bionic 01 did not get) appeared to be over 20 miles away. I would say that qualifys as a long range locator.

So what did the indicated "target" turn out to be?

 

[fenixdigger]

I'm sure you guys were talking about this experiment and not off topic. I'll "guess"


Just to be on the safe side,,, Do you have any proof Can you provide corroboration for your statements to validate your claim?

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI swr posted --> I won't bother posting the electronics of what makes this device "work".
************
Obviously, since you have made so many boo boos regarding electronics, and these devices especially, that it must be embarrassing.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

I'm sure you guys were talking about this experiment and not off topic. I'll "guess"


Just to be on the safe side,,, Do you have any proof Can you provide corroboration for your statements to validate your claim?

I know the fenix brothers aren't talking to me, because they supposedly have me on Ignore.

 

[EE THr]

HI swr posted --> I won't bother posting the electronics of what makes this device "work".
************
Obviously, since you have made so many boo boos regarding electronics, and these devices especially, that it must be embarrassing.

Don Jose de La Mancha

I didn't see any boo boos about electronics made by SWR. What, in particular, are you talking about?

And speaking of boo boos about electronics, I don't think you are one to talk!

 

[fenixdigger]

I'm sure glad we had the chance for everyone to experiment with Long Range Theory.

We'll set it up again this evening if the neighbors come over.

As you know many of the store bought units use L Rods of some type. For precision, the lengths and material makes a difference, for the experiment, any metal will work. Keep the long side under 17 in.

Art or Eddie, If the little rabbits try it, please quote them. Sure I won't be seeing that quote.

Let's call their bluff---SHO-NUFF

 

[aarthrj3811]

No LT..He is complaining about this..

I didn't see any boo boos about electronics made by SWR.

I guess like minds do think the same or do they have the same mind?...Art

 

[fenixdigger]

They will use anything for justification of their fugue. Think of all the refusals of proofs. Now it's down to them deciding what's dowsing and what's not, due to their "experience"(snicker).

We all know the truth that any man made signal involved takes it out of dowsing, but it feels good to them to "justify" not trying it.

Heck, it's good therapy for them. At least everything is going along the Predicted 10,000 Posts line.

 

[EE THr]

They will use anything for justification of their fugue. Think of all the refusals of proofs. Now it's down to them deciding what's dowsing and what's not, due to their "experience"(snicker).

We all know the truth that any man made signal involved takes it out of dowsing, but it feels good to them to "justify" not trying it.

Heck, it's good therapy for them. At least everything is going along the Predicted 10,000 Posts line.

Let me see if I have your story straight now...dowsing is the same as LRLs, but LRLs are not dowsing. Is that right?

 

[fenixdigger]

We set up and had 2 neighbors here.

Results of first time users-----5 attempts------subject 1------3 correct---1 questionable---1 wrong

subject 2------4 correct---1 wrong


Wind was a little problem and had to move once. More to follow.

 

[EE THr]

We set up and had 2 neighbors here.

Results of first time users-----5 attempts------subject 1------3 correct---1 questionable---1 wrong

subject 2------4 correct---1 wrong


Wind was a little problem and had to move once. More to follow.

fenix brothers (whichever one you are today)---

Thanks for posting your alleged results.

Now lets do the math. A total of ten attempts, with 7 correct hits. That's 70% success.

And, since LRLs are even better than coathangers, you should get at least 80% with an LRL, right? You say they are better, right?

Well, if you can get 80% success with an LRL, and Carl's test only requires 70%, then you can pass it without any problems, right? Congratulations!

When will you be collecting your $25,000.00?