Field Results from The Sho-Nuff Test

[fenixdigger]

Notice none of them have yet tried it? No matter what cute little delusional statement or subject swapping , or lame excuse, you still can't spend 15 mins to see the truth. That tells everyone you aren't after the truth, are you? Any experiment that was in my power to try that Carl suggested, I tried. Same with Hung, Art, and others. I try them. WHY? The thing that SCARES you to pieces--THE TRUTH.

Now twist this around so it feels good and be sure to justify it, maybe toss in an insult or two, top it with a little denial and ground up transference,,, there you have it ,, a skeptic Sunday, no need to add nuts, already got em.

Dude still whining about his POS dowsing test?

HA... somebody upload them a crying towel

(i'm sure Arch will take the POS dowsing test for 10K)

Your little excuse seems mighty thin. Please post any proof that a real dowser confirms this is "dowsing" Remember --No mental effort.

Only the sample and the target. Real dowser---someone with years of hands on experience.

So you are saying you will try it if it's not dowsing?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!

[fenixdigger]

That's a fine little answer there. Are you a state senator? You must be in politics. I didn't understand a bit of that answer. Somebody that speaks gobbly-gook translate that? To me it looked like, I can't and won't try anything that might prove I've been wrong as I could not take a truth like that and I'm getting more and more afraid it's true.

So is that what you are saying?

 

[woof!]

Hey, Fenix, that whole exchange left me bewildered as to who was saying what, too.

Let's start at the beginning. On this website there are two related forums, the dowsing forum and the LRL forum. The dowsing forum manages to go about its business without extraordinary difficulty: when Artie posts there he at least seems coherent and on subject. The LRL forum on the other hand is preceded by the site owner's warning of potential fraud, and the issue of fraud permeates the entire discussion here. For good reason. To pretend that fraud isn't the elephant in the living room is to label yourself as someone who is clueless, dishonest, or a victim of "true believer" syndrome. I don't know any choices other than those three.

Not that dowsing itself isn't controversial. The Western religious tradition has mostly opposed it for nearly 4 millenia, and for good reason. Most people lack the critical thinking skills to understand the results, and therefore become victims of superstition. It got lumped into the same category as idol worship. Nowadays some folks have a more nuanced perspective on such things, but that nuanced perspective honors the insights of the ancient philosophers rather than rejecting them.

LRL'ing is about supposed electronic enhancement of dowsing. Nothing that has been reported in this arena is credible: in fact when it comes to examination of actual circuits for which claims have been made, the circuits do not correspond to the claims. So far there's a consistent track record: 100% bogus.

I predict that you will persist on the path you've invested in. It gives you what you want, so why would you do anything otherwise? Someday you may wake up and choose different wants, and your LRL days will be over.

--Toto

 

[fenixdigger]

LRL'ing is about supposed electronic enhancement of dowsing. Nothing that has been reported in this arena is credible: in fact when it comes to examination of actual circuits for which claims have been made, the circuits do not correspond to the claims. So far there's a consistent track record: 100% bogus.
******
Long range locators do not have to be powered. IF it requires NO mental effort and has a range further than "normal" dowsing, guess what? LRL Would you say 20+ miles qualifys?

I predict that you will persist on the path you've invested in. It gives you what you want, so why would you do anything otherwise? Someday you may wake up and choose different wants, and your LRL days will be over.

You are correct. We have set goals. Once those are reached, I'm done.

 

[EE THr]

Long range locators do not have to be powered. IF it requires NO mental effort and has a range further than "normal" dowsing, guess what? LRL Would you say 20+ miles qualifys?

If you clamp the handle in a vise, will your LRL pointer follow a moving target?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

If you clamp the handle in a vise, will your LRL pointer follow a moving target?

How would we know...We use them to locate and recover buried treasure..if you can tell us where we can find a buried treasure that is capable of moving we will give it a try..Art

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

If you clamp the handle in a vise, will your LRL pointer follow a moving target?

How would we know...We use them to locate and recover buried treasure..if you can tell us where we can find a buried treasure that is capable of moving we will give it a try..Art

Well, you have stated before that the pointer won't follow a moving target if the handle is clamped in a vise. Are you changing your story now?

You have also said before that you must tilt your hand to make the pointer move, because it is not powered by the device.

Why do you keep changing your story?

The LRL pointers are either driven by the device, or they are not. Which is it?



[mod]THIS MESSAGE IS FOR EVERYONE ON THIS THREAD. ANYMORE INSULTS AND THIS WHOLE THREAD WILL BE GONE!![/mod]

 

[aarthrj3811]

Already answered... http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,409519.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,410482.0.html

 

[EE THr]

Already answered... http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,409519.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,410482.0.html

Rather than requiring the reading of both of those long threads, can you simply say which answer you are now claiming?

 

[fenixdigger]

Woof; Is this something you can try? It will give you some answers you are looking for. If you are really interested.