Field Results from The Sho-Nuff Test

Status
Not open for further replies.
Art; You know that those of us that have been DOING experiments, understand that when dealing with reactions to an unseen force, you have only the actions and reactions to decipher.

Once you get the actual situation of "lines, rings, and rays" then put in the natural anomalies, (which change from place to place)
you have to find a solution to these to increase the % of good targets and ways to determine where you are at on the lines.

No small task. I understand why some can't do this to the point of success. I can't understand why someone WON'T try to experience an invisible phenomena. Lack of the spirit of adventure? (plus the "other" things).
 

Hey LT…I found that I could not get the usual swing on Black Hills gold yesterday. I modified the 691 number and the swing was better but still not to my liking..Art
 

aarthrj3811 said:
Hey LT…I found that I could not get the usual swing on Black Hills gold yesterday. I modified the 691 number and the swing was better but still not to my liking..Art

Try 219.952
 

The addition of a neg. ion gen. into this experiment has been real interesting. The effects last longer than the EMP device.

The current experiments are targeted at finding the difference in line and ring signals. Any input is appreciated.
 

SWR---

I changed the 525 setting on my oven/map dowsing chamber to just a hair between that and 526, and now the pendulum swings in circles instead of straight lines. Clockwise for gold and counterclockwise for silver.

I'm researching the temperature for platinum now, and I'll let you know how it works. A new number came to me in a dream. Not my dream, but my cat's dream. I had to waterboard him to tell me, but it's his fault for clamming up, right? Anything for a buck.

P.S. I found that if you tape the buttons on the microwave with five layers of duct tape, nobody can accidentally turn it on. I did find my wife trying to remove the tape, but the cat had a talk with her, and i don't think she'll try that again.

These nut case LRLers probably won't even try it! Oh well, it's their loss.

:coffee2:
 

I'm sure you little helpers had some real good input, but I'll pass since you don't have a clue, and you don't have a appointment

for any time on the ole diggers couch today. I know you need it, but just double the meds.


Don't be a mooch give each other a smooch
Be an engineer that's tuff--try the SHO-NUFF
 

Ok now, how did you not make your usual insult reply?? Prozac???
 

fenixdigger said:
Ok now, how did you not make your usual insult reply?? Prozac???


I read in a sick-ology book that people who constantly try to accuse others of mental disabilities, are actually suffering from what they call "inferiority complexes." They do it in order to try and make themselves appear superior.

The only other explanation is that you use it as a way to try and divert attention off the fact that you don't want to face the actual issues which are presented by your opponents, because you know that you can't come up with any rational response. Hint: That's because LRLs are fake devices!

:laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7: :laughing7:

Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test, and collect the $25,000.00?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
 

Ahhh, Looks like 2 in the boat. SHO-NUFF
 

Here's what you are missing by not trying this. I got a phone call from someone working with this and the changes we are making.

He picked up 2 extra signals that turned out to be other silver targets. The longer the samples are left down, the further the range.

Mark your signals 1/2 hour after placing the sample, now leave it overnight and recheck. Imagine the links of something in the

ground 200 yrs. Anyone ever test for the max. range this can occur?
 

PIC_0401.JPG
 

Thank God you cut off the bottom of that picture. That initiation rite is secret.

Seems no one has said what kind of plant that is. A mystery??
 

It's a treasure marker put there by the Spanish to mark tons of gold.

They used Yamash-ita tunnel techniques, so the gold will be at a 100 feet depth. Start digging.
 

With all the challenges, demands, and posturing, lets bring this back into play.

IF YOU want to continue arguing this does not exist, DISPROVE this first. This won't cost you anything. IF you are serious, then PROVE

it. The cute little excuses that this is "DOWSING" has been eliminated by real dowsers. If one dowser says that using a "bait" and NO

mental effort is dowsing, I will shut my mouth and apologize. Book lookers do not qualify as dowsers.


fenixdigger said:
I have offered a simple inexpensive experiment as a basic test to enable someone to comprehend answers about LRL use.

It is as follows; Place a silver quarter on the ground (sample). Put 1 silver quarter and 4 steel washers in separate paper towels that you wad up and then mix them up. Throw them on the ground 25 ft or so around the sample. Take your coat hanger L Rod (17 x 5 inches) and walk around the sample clockwise 6 ft from the sample. SLOWLY, with the rod held slightly down.

Watch for any movement. If you get a reaction, stop, back up and slowly move forward to verify it. Check the results and post them here.

I will post the results of my personal test after I do this with 5 other people. I will post their results first.

As it uses a "bait" or "sample" I do not consider this "dowsing" more like a non electrical LRL.

If the instructions are not clear enough or too complicated for an attempt, ask for clarification.
 

Hey guys. Don't forget, here's your chance to "man up". Gonna pass again are you? Get some.
 

Don't have to Eel, We got you and Sparky Sr. Nothingness at its perfection. I'd post some of the complaints I get about you guys, but I sure Marc would blip them.

Continue on with your nothing. The 10,001 Post Prediction continues,,,,,,,,,
 

HI PBSRW#1. Room, I am a bit curious, one of the greatest detractors is always asking for proof of actions from others, yet he consistently is unable to answer many of the questions asked of him. Instead he simply diverts the postings away from himself, and conveniently avoids answering, is it because he doesn't know?.

To date he still hasn't answered questions, many from 3 years ago, some of which would go a long way to clarify certain factors ? ? ? .

Don Jose de La Mancha
 

Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp said:
HI PBSRW#1. Room, I am a bit curious, one of the greatest detractors is always asking for proof of actions from others, yet he consistently is unable to answer many of the questions asked of him. Instead he simply diverts the postings away from himself, and conveniently avoids answering, is it because he doesn't know?.

To date he still hasn't answered questions, many from 3 years ago, some of which would go a long way to clarify certain factors ? ? ? .

Don Jose de La Mancha


The LRL section is about LRLs. Not about people.

It's the LRL promoters who always want to change the subject to "people." Of course that is because they can't answer simple, common sense questions about the devices. And, of course it is also because they can't ever pass a random double-blind test.

:sign13:



Here is my favorite---

aarthrj3811 said:
I will not participate in: The following threads.. They no longer serve any purpose for the t-net membership…All the questions have been answered and then spun and twisted. I will still tell people where to find our proof and show people where to find the nonsense answers to our proof…And yes..I will not let this con-artist off the hook…Art

There are times we may need to free up hard disk space, and may delete older threads by date. There are other times when whole sections may be deleted, or changed. We make no guarantees as to the lifespan of a post or thread, or attachment. We reserve the right to delete any post at any time for any reason.

When the purpose of the original post has been fulfilled, the thread should end. If you want to talk about something else, start a new thread in an appropriate forum.

http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,389117.0.html
Maybe We Can Agree?
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,393449.0.html
What do LRL Promoters Fear the Most?

http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,389594.0.html
Different Ways of Testing LRLs
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,394624.0.html
Do The Math
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,387205.0.html
Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,390641.0.html
The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer



Thank you for verifying the whole point of all those threads, by admitting that you cannot confront those topics.



:sign10: :sign10: :sign10: :sign10: :sign10: :sign10:
 

Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp
HI PBSRW#1. Room, I am a bit curious, one of the greatest detractors is always asking for proof of actions from others, yet he consistently is unable to answer many of the questions asked of him. Instead he simply diverts the postings away from himself, and conveniently avoids answering, is it because he doesn't know?.
To date he still hasn't answered questions, many from 3 years ago, some of which would go a long way to clarify certain factors ? ? ? .
Don Jose de La Mancha
Great post Don..I just love the answers
~EE~
The LRL section is about LRLs. Not about people.
It's the LRL promoters who always want to change the subject to "people." Of course that is because they can't answer simple, common sense questions about the devices. And, of course it is also because they can't ever pass a random double-blind test.
Thank you for verifying the whole point of all those threads, by admitting that you cannot confront those topics.
~SWR~
Simply another lame attempt of character assassination by the LRL proponents/pro-fraudsters. Who have shown, once again... that slinging mud is all they have to validate/support their extraordinary claims.
Keep up the good work guys but be careful SWR..Your title of “lrl Salesman of the year is in limbo..Art
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top