Field Results from The Sho-Nuff Test

[fenixdigger]

I tell you we may have the poster children for Transference and Denial here. Almost every post is an example. Go back 7,000 posts ago

and it is the same. The condition was the same, just not as bad. And since birds of a feather,,,,,

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!

[fenixdigger]

Well Sparky, If telling the truth turns out to be character assassination (Doncha just love that word?) ((Like the forum, got 2 asses in it))

Ya gotta realize that character is truly a mess. It is what it is. Don't be hating.

 

[fenixdigger]

Can someone say "Delusional Justification? The truth is the truth. Now run along and promote those fraudulent little tests, don't answer any legit questions, demand all kinds of goofy things you can't possibly understand, insult people, bring ALL those Freudian traits in here,
ask the same question over and over because the answer was not the one you wanted. This could be long, but your mind will simply twist it around for someone else to be doing these things, not you. Seen you do it countless times, so one more won't hurt. Go ahead, twist it.

 

[fenixdigger]

Guess you didn't see the rest of the post. Is that the selective blindness again that you apply when you get questioned, like validate your statement that you are an EE?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

Is somebody going to ring a bell, or shoot off a flare when one of the LRL proponents/pro-fraudsters creates a truthful post?

I do not hear the bells ringing or see the flares..A simple question that has been asked many times since you told us how long you claim to have been an EE…
~LT~

Guess you didn't see the rest of the post. Is that the selective blindness again that you apply when you get questioned, like validate your statement that you are an EE?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~SWR~

Hey fenixdigger…How dare you challenge the king..

yep....true to form, the LRL Proponents/pro-Fraudsters would much rather chat/gossip about about people than defend the fraudulent devices they so cherish.
You go get em' there, Sluggo. Who needs to post about a silly dowsing test, anyhow. When there is gossip and banter to divert the discussion.

Who needs to post about a silly dowsing test, anyhow. When there is gossip and banter to divert the discussion.
Topic name … Field Results from The Sho-Nuff Test

I have offered a simple inexpensive experiment as a basic test to enable someone to comprehend answers about LRL use.
It is as follows; Place a silver quarter on the ground (sample). Put 1 silver quarter and 4 steel washers in separate paper towels that you wad up and then mix them up. Throw them on the ground 25 ft or so around the sample. Take your coat hanger L Rod (17 x 5 inches) and walk around the sample clockwise 6 ft from the sample. SLOWLY, with the rod held slightly down.
Watch for any movement. If you get a reaction, stop, back up and slowly move forward to verify it. Check the results and post them here.
I will post the results of my personal test after I do this with 5 other people. I will post their results first.
As it uses a "bait" or "sample" I do not consider this "dowsing" more like a non electrical LRL.
If the instructions are not clear enough or too complicated for an attempt, ask for clarification

.
Keep asking the simple questions LT…They seem to panic him because he does not know what we know..Art

 

[EE THr]

What is a dowsing test topic doing on the LRL forum to begin with?

It's about devices, not supposed "techniques" or claims of treasure hunts.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

What is a dowsing test topic doing on the LRL forum to begin with?
It's about devices, not supposed "techniques" or claims of treasure hunts

.

Sorry that a "dumb" set of rods have confused the Skeptic..You may want to try a dumb set of rods sometime and see just how smart they are..Art

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HI aa, I notice that swr's latest post states -->yep....true to form, the LRL Proponents/pro-Fraudsters would much rather chat/gossip about about people than defend the fraudulent devices they so cherish.


***************
Interesting, since of the last 22 posts by swr 2 are on subject, all of the rest are personal or group remarks that are completely irrelevant to the subject.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[aarthrj3811]

~Tropical Tramp~

Interesting, since of the last 22 posts by swr 2 are on subject, all of the rest are personal or group remarks that are completely irrelevant to the subject.

Yes that is the way he posts. Have you also notice the predictable pattern when he is ask a question?..Sure case of someone with no knowledge of the subject..he complains because people are answering him and not the LRL’s..He may have some tools that answer him but I do not own those kinds of tools..Art

 

[fenixdigger]

With all the challenges, demands, and posturing, lets bring this back into play.

IF YOU want to continue arguing this does not exist, DISPROVE this first. This won't cost you anything. IF you are serious, then PROVE

it. The cute little excuses that this is "DOWSING" has been eliminated by real dowsers. If one dowser says that using a "bait" and NO

mental effort is dowsing, I will shut my mouth and apologize. Book lookers do not qualify as dowsers.

I have offered a simple inexpensive experiment as a basic test to enable someone to comprehend answers about LRL use.

It is as follows; Place a silver quarter on the ground (sample). Put 1 silver quarter and 4 steel washers in separate paper towels that you wad up and then mix them up. Throw them on the ground 25 ft or so around the sample. Take your coat hanger L Rod (17 x 5 inches) and walk around the sample clockwise 6 ft from the sample. SLOWLY, with the rod held slightly down.

Watch for any movement. If you get a reaction, stop, back up and slowly move forward to verify it. Check the results and post them here.

I will post the results of my personal test after I do this with 5 other people. I will post their results first.

As it uses a "bait" or "sample" I do not consider this "dowsing" more like a non electrical LRL.

If the instructions are not clear enough or too complicated for an attempt, ask for clarification.

Looks like NO dowser has come forward to verify this experiment is dowsing. The key here is NO mental involvement. Simple enough for MOST electricians and SOME E.E.'s.

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

Good morning room. I noticed that swr has over 3 posts with the same 'copy and paste' remark. I believe that this falls under our faithful mod's rule of flatly being considered as spaming ! Also, while being derogatroy in a very personal sense, has nothing to do with the subject being hosted.

Quote swr --> " Simply another lame attempt of character assassination by the LRL proponents/pro-fraudsters. Who have shown, once again... that slinging mud is all they have to validate/support their extraordinary claims".

Interesting, since of the last 23 posts by swr 2 are on subject, all of the rest are personal or group remarks that are completely irrelevant to the subject.

Yes, the last sentence above is a copy and paste.


Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[fenixdigger]

As I have said before (over and over) this experiment "simulates" one of the theorys that electronic LRLs use.
NO MENTAL EFFORT is involved--see definition of DOWSING.

I know it is scary to certain people, (fear of "rods") ((penile obsessivia)), (agoraphobic), (fear of quarters), ((I don't know the name of that)),

I know from what we are dealing with here, there is NO justification unless it comes from them, So as after 10,000 posts the game is the same. TAKE THE TEST AND QUIT BEING BABIES. FORGET ABOUT STEALING ANY DEVICES/PROCEDURES.

Get on with your lives, quit obsessing.

 

[EE THr]

As I have said before (over and over) this experiment "simulates" one of the theorys that electronic LRLs use.
NO MENTAL EFFORT is involved--see definition of DOWSING.

I know it is scary to certain people, (fear of "rods") ((penile obsessivia)), (agoraphobic), (fear of quarters), ((I don't know the name of that)),

I know from what we are dealing with here, there is NO justification unless it comes from them, So as after 10,000 posts the game is the same. TAKE THE TEST AND QUIT BEING BABIES. FORGET ABOUT STEALING ANY DEVICES/PROCEDURES.

Get on with your lives, quit obsessing.

And if someone actually did your suggested test, then posted that it didn't work, what would you say?

 

[fenixdigger]

Since the experiment has worked 100% of the time, I would know they are lying. Do you think I would have posted something that was a "maybe"it will work? Of course you do, that's your nature. It's not mine.

Take the hangers and walk across the yard where the electricity or water pipes are buried. Do it in a place you have no idea where they are. Then take a detector (if you have one) and verify it. Pretty simple.

 

[EE THr]

Since the experiment has worked 100% of the time, I would know they are lying. Do you think I would have posted something that was a "maybe"it will work? Of course you do, that's your nature. It's not mine.

Take the hangers and walk across the yard where the electricity or water pipes are buried. Do it in a place you have no idea where they are. Then take a detector (if you have one) and verify it. Pretty simple.

So if someone finds that it doesn't work, you will simply say they are wrong, no matter what.

Isn't that one of your primary complaints against the anti-fraudsters?

That results in a stalemate, at best.

How can this matter be resolved?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

So if someone finds that it doesn't work, you will simply say they are wrong, no matter what.
Isn't that one of your primary complaints against the anti-fraudsters?
That results in a stalemate, at best.
How can this matter be resolved?

Hundreds of people have already done the expeiment
Real simple to find out..Do the experiment and make a detailed report..It will be easy to tell, if the experiment was done or not...Art

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

So if someone finds that it doesn't work, you will simply say they are wrong, no matter what.
Isn't that one of your primary complaints against the anti-fraudsters?
That results in a stalemate, at best.
How can this matter be resolved?

Hundreds of people have already done the expeiment
Real simple to find out..Do the experiment and make a detailed report..It will be easy to tell, if the experiment was done or not...Art

Whether someone did the fleanix or not, it wouldn't do any good to post the results, because there would be no proof either way.

The fleanix "experiment" is merely a diversion off the topic.

It remains that is anyone had an "LRL" that actually worked, and wanted to convince others that it did, he would simply prove it by taking Carl's test, and collecting the $25,000.00.

Why ask people to walk around with bent coat hangers, when you can document it once an for all, plus get 25K for doing so?

There is no real reason not to, and a two very good reasons for taking Carl's test---unless you know that your "LRL" won't work.

You can invent all the "reasons" not to, that you want, but in doing so you are just being your own best "skeptic." The more excuses you come up with, the worse it makes you look.

So that's up to you.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

Whether someone did the fleanix or not, it wouldn't do any good to post the results, because there would be no proof either way.

I don’t see any posts from a fleanix..Except for yourself

The fleanix "experiment" is merely a diversion off the topic.

Field Results from The Sho-Nuff Test …Seems to be on topic

It remains that is anyone had an "LRL" that actually worked, and wanted to convince others that it did, he would simply prove it by taking Carl's test, and collecting the $25,000.00.

Right back to Carl’s fake double blind test

Why ask people to walk around with bent coat hangers, when you can document it once an for all, plus get 25K for doing so?

Dreamer..Carl’s test will only prove if one man can or can not use his device

There is no real reason not to, and a two very good reasons for taking Carl's test---unless you know that your "LRL" won't work.

I can see you point of view..You are desperate for any kind of proof

You can invent all the "reasons" not to, that you want, but in doing so you are just being your own best "skeptic." The more excuses you come up with, the worse it makes you look.

Why should we believe you?

So that's up to you.

Yes it is..What I do is none of your business.
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,408867.msg2910303.html#msg2910303

 

[fenixdigger]

Alright guys, quit pushing the steal your stuff test. Find me 1 LRL user that believes it is on the up& up. I have not seen 1 in here yet. Where's that common sense you taut?

What is a system worth that is over 70% accurate every time? I'm not saying they exist only asking a simple question. Please use a simple answer, a guess would do.

How certain are you that gravity exists? Do certain exercises prove it? I'm giving you an exercise to prove a different type of "gravity"
exists. Are you afraid of the truth? I know Sparky Sr. is. I've seen him run under the table like a scared puppy in a lightning storm,
then come out all blustery to try to hide it. Oh yea, it fooled everybody. you can tell his 10,000 posts have earned him great respect among members. Ok, that was a lie. You are well on your way.

Don't skip the what's it worth part. Let's see some reality.