Carl-NC
Bronze Member
- Mar 19, 2003
- 1,891
- 1,418
- Detector(s) used
- Custom Designs and Prototypes
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
EE THr said:Surface penetration of IR sensing devices has not been the concept of discussion here.
Not sure about this particular thread (ain't gonna re-read the whole durn thing) but in a parallel thread (cameras see gold) it was discussed. In response to claims of using IR photography to capture buried gold, I posted:
Soil doesn't transmit ("pass") IR. IR radiation strikes the surface of the soil, is converted to heat, which thermally conducts (poorly) through the soil.
It appears you are under the impression that IR radiation penetrates the soil, all the way down to a buried object, and the buried object absorbs more IR than the surrounding soil. Then, late in the day, the buried object re-radiates the IR at a higher rate than the surrounding soil, making itself "visible" to an IR detector. It doesn't work this way, at all. There are some simple experiments that would easily prove this.
Yes, many folks are under the impression that IR directly penetrates down to the target. Even more are under the impression that buried metals will heat and cool more slowly than surrounding soil.