I know we can go searching for these videos. But it's hard when you drink the FB tea.
I would, but don't want to break any rules or have the thread locked or deleted. Seems a lot of what I and others have posted in other threads on this topic disappeared as there was a Mod who proclaimed there will be no debate or nay-sayers allowed in threads on this story, till the FBI proves its innocence beyond a reasonable doubt in court. Trying to play by his rules here.
The picture underneath your above comment with the text, "Did the FBI find gold here" doesn't look like there has been a significant excavation around that rock for decades, if ever. And I'm not talking about the scattered leaves and tree limbs/trunks. It doesn't even look like a crowd of people stood around in that area, much less any heavy equipment or even any manual, old school shoveling. If the FBI did find gold there I'd say is was sitting on top of the ground, in plain sight under that rock. Five teenagers hanging out and drinking beer there one night would have left more evidence of human activity.
It's clearly stated in the record. The FK group approached the investigators. The investigators acted on probable cause. Anyone suggesting that law enforcement involved in an investigation to unearth something must prove their innocence in a court of law, when nothing is unearthed, is misguided. Innocence from what? The current court case has nothing to do with innocence or guilt of anything, it is a lawsuit over a freedom of information request for records.
The excavation occurred above and slightly behind the large rock.
I think that’s where they drilled into the gold bar. That’s when the drill bit had gold smeared on it. The hidden cameras were near there too that captured the night dig.
No gold bar was drilled into. They didn’t even take the smear to get analyzed for gold.
“Hay, that’s how the game is played” (Apparently).
Pisser on this one is the author stating the F.B.I. alleges gold there.
(As if they dragged the Prada's in instead of the other way around.)
Who convinced whom a dig was needed?
Let's not ignore what was happening WITHOUT the F.B.I. being involved prior.
That wasn't exactly tea with the local residents, or the law.
FB tea = Facebook tea meaning I don't subscribe to Facebook.
Okay, thanks for the reply.
I'm just giving a layman's thought on your comment.
They are from Youtube.
I didn't study timeline including date of the video. It's post F.B.I. presence during their dig I'm thinking.
Yes I was aware of how the F.B.I. became involved in a dig.
Eyewitnesses have described seeing "armored trucks" in the area. Quite frankly, you would expect that anyone expecting they might find a large cache would be prepared and have trucks available if needed. However, we learn from the Plaintiffs own interviews with eyewitnesses that these vehicles were described as Lenco Bearcat types. The same type of law enforcement, SWAT vehicles utilized in municipalities throughout the US to transport officers.
To my knowledge, nobody has ever found proof of this shipment. It is probably why the original folklore tale was then muddied with assertions that the KGC was using Dents Run as a depository.
