Dog and Silver:
The Cache Forum is pro-cache hunting, not anti-cache hunting. If you two want to start a thread about why
you should not cache hunt go ahead.
My thread is about a probable cache, not about theories, personal viewpoints and general mischief. Your
misunderstanding of how to go about an actual recovery is only mildly amusing. In the past I have gotten
all the Ts crossed, Is dotted and permission slip in hand. It was educational and fun but I found I could not
stay in the vicinity long enough to cover 300 acres of hardscrabble alone.
That one was believable, the river bend was there, the log cabin was still there but I was unable to find the
plow disc that covered the gold bars. I call that one "a possible" and is most likely still there.
A "probable" is a first person account of a known drop that remains where it was placed. A top tier cache lead.
I didn't need a pendulum holder to convince me to dig randomly and throw my joints into kilter. It took three
years of research to get to this point. Until I can a solid partner who is resourceful, one who can go through
all the records, deeds, etc, and is willing to accept a four-way split it will remain probable.
?
