vor
Bronze Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2012
- Messages
- 1,764
- Reaction score
- 453
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
I am usually a landowner advocate but this is a peculiar situation where the property owner is not the cache owner.
There must be some reason for you to want the gf's daughter to get something so that is fine. But if Player wanted the gf or daughter to get something, why wouldn't he will it to them or at least let them know where it is?
So not knowing the relationship between Player and gf, it is hard to advise. Seems to me that it is open season on the cache. Since it is buried so shallow and you know the location, maybe a two man stake out with one man on a probe would give you an idea if it is still there. You would surely hear the probe hitting hollow PVC.
With so many partners on your end, it seems out of whack to give 1/2 to the landowner for something that isn't hers (different from Frankn's deal where the cache was legally owned by property owner).
While I wouldn't want someone to trespass on my property, if they did so without disturbing anything a landowner wouldn't have any cause of action. No harm, no foul rule.
There must be some reason for you to want the gf's daughter to get something so that is fine. But if Player wanted the gf or daughter to get something, why wouldn't he will it to them or at least let them know where it is?
So not knowing the relationship between Player and gf, it is hard to advise. Seems to me that it is open season on the cache. Since it is buried so shallow and you know the location, maybe a two man stake out with one man on a probe would give you an idea if it is still there. You would surely hear the probe hitting hollow PVC.
With so many partners on your end, it seems out of whack to give 1/2 to the landowner for something that isn't hers (different from Frankn's deal where the cache was legally owned by property owner).
While I wouldn't want someone to trespass on my property, if they did so without disturbing anything a landowner wouldn't have any cause of action. No harm, no foul rule.