S
sandugo
Guest
Re: 2007 EXPEDITION: YAMASH-I-T-A ( Japanese) TREASURE
It is understandable that not all treasure hunters believe in the Yamashi-ta Treasure. This treasures are also legendary to me, to some point of my personal experience these treasures did really exist. What is very disgusting is to a person trying to intellectually kill with his one sided part of history a treasure hunt he never wished to take part. What's really the purpose of SWRs undying skeptism of these treasures? What's in there when you have nothing to give? Negative inputs to feed your greedy intentions or somebody tasked to kill the truth of the treasures existence? The only difference between a coin hunter and a Yamashi-ta treasure hunter is the volume of a find and the level of difficulty to find the lost treasure. All other procedures are the same. We look at a map, go find the location, do metal detection and spit out the dirt to find the treasure. So what must be the big deal for SWR to be so very dedicated with his reasons?
It is understandable that not all treasure hunters believe in the Yamashi-ta Treasure. This treasures are also legendary to me, to some point of my personal experience these treasures did really exist. What is very disgusting is to a person trying to intellectually kill with his one sided part of history a treasure hunt he never wished to take part. What's really the purpose of SWRs undying skeptism of these treasures? What's in there when you have nothing to give? Negative inputs to feed your greedy intentions or somebody tasked to kill the truth of the treasures existence? The only difference between a coin hunter and a Yamashi-ta treasure hunter is the volume of a find and the level of difficulty to find the lost treasure. All other procedures are the same. We look at a map, go find the location, do metal detection and spit out the dirt to find the treasure. So what must be the big deal for SWR to be so very dedicated with his reasons?