2008 EXPEDITION: YAMASH-I-T-A ( Japanese) TREASURE

Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp said:
swr I believe that there is a rule against repetitious posting of the same words, particularly boring ones.

Don Jose de La Mancha

Well said Don Jose de La Mancha. People who don't do their own research and copy and paste their own rhetoric are not contributing anything useful or worthwhile to this thread.
 

Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp said:
HI, wanna relax a bit with some very, very, ornamental gals sigh and they are beautiful. A fantastic Chinese export.

---> http://www.nzwide.com/swanlake.htm

Relax my friend, obviously my remark is extremely positive and complimentary. luv em.

Don Jose de La Mancha

No problem Don Jose de La Mancha, I understand your meaning of the word, it is the other person who I think uses it in a derogatory sense.
 

Wrong-o-rama Guess-Who. I used it just the same way as Don Jose. I'm a big fan of said girls.


It's just that you are way too sensitive to be using the Internet.
 

Saturna said:
Wrong-o-rama Guess-Who. I used it just the same way as Don Jose. I'm a big fan of said girls.


It's just that you are way too sensitive to be using the Internet.

If what you are saying is true, then I apologize. People who are actually doing things in this line of business can't be too sensitive about strict confidentiality.
 

Hi swr, you posted --> Well now. In-lieu of validating your claim with reliable references, sources or citations you choose to gossip about other members.
That's cool. It's all good... you'd rather contribute banter, misinformation, solicitation of fraud than man-up and prove what you say is factual.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

'You, of course have valid, verifiable, proof of this from an unbiased third person source '?? snicker.



Go watch the beautiful Chinese gals and enjoy yourself.

Don Jose de La Mancha
 

Be careful Don Jose de La Mancha. Instead of doing his own research, SWR might accuse you of solicitation of fraud, among other things, none of which are useful or helpful to anybody in this forum.
 

I wonder where Imelda got all this wealth, or where Ferdinand got the $100 Billion in gold certificates he showed Zobel in Hawaii.

 

Marcos got his wealth from the same place that ALL corrupt rulers do. From looting the public treasury.

Do you think Egypt's Mubarek and similar people got their fortunes from finding secret treasure ??
 

Harhar, yeah the Marcos were really concerned about not displaying their wealth. :D


Especially "I have 3000 pairs of shoes" Imelda.
 

Nope, not for a second. The dreamers have been looking for these 'treasures' for a long time and have found nothing.

Marcos, like any corrupt leader, knows where the real money is. The country's treasury. Even a small GDP is alot for an individual.

Por ejemplo, Haiti is a poor country, yet the leaders lived in a big palace. This is standard issue stuff Don Jose.
 

Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp said:
HI Sat, unfortunately the Philippine treasury was rather lean at that time, It couldn't have supported such a drain without being 'very' public.

Don Jose de La Mancha

Hi Don Jose ~ I don't think you will get anywhere discussing anything with somebody who knows absolutely nothing about the Philippines, but thinks he is capable of debating about the Philippines. If he had a clue as to how many TRILLIONS OF PESOS that $100 Billion amounts to, he would know how foolish his statement is. The same goes for the major recoveries that have been made here, several of which have been meticulously documented with incontrovertible evidence, as well as the lesser ones that have been done covertly and not documented for the public to see. Debating with somebody this clueless is a colossal waste of time, and does not contribute anything worthwhile or helpful for those who are making recoveries. This is just my opinion for you Don Jose, and I can see why you might want to do it for entertainment purposes. Now I expect to see all the redundant unsolicited remarks by others who have nothing better to do. Oh well..........
 

I guess you never get tired of copying and pasting your redundant comments over and over again. If you are interested in the topic why don't you do your own research and come back when you have something worthwhile to contribute? There is a wealth of documentation backed up by incontrovertible evidence, so logic dictates that you are not interested enough to do your homework. As I said, I expect to see all the redundant unsolicited remarks by others who have nothing better to do. I have an idea, why not contribute something that is worthwhile to others?
 

Morning Sat, swr, you posted -->In-lieu of providing reliable references, sources, documentation and citations that might validate your extraordinary claims..
************
I agree, Sat & swr, now show me where the Philippine treasury had the capability to supply Marcos with that much money or if so, where they showed such a loss.

Don Jose de La Mancha
 

So you're saying that all poorer countries where the rulers live in luxury & wealth (and there are many), and the people are poor, are the result of the leaders finding tons of gold to finance their lifestyle ?



(Oh, by the way, sorry, but I don't have the Philippine's treasury records at hand ::) )
 

Saturna said:
So you're saying that all poorer countries where the rulers live in luxury & wealth (and there are many), and the people are poor, are the result of the leaders finding tons of gold to finance their lifestyle ?



(Oh, by the way, sorry, but I don't have the Philippine's treasury records at hand ::) )
:tongue3: Ya gotta bring a$$ to get a$$ :tongue3:
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top