Re: 2007 EXPEDITION: YAMASH-I-T-A ( Japanese) TREASURE
Greenapple,
Since I have not seen it personally, nor touch and examine it, it will be too hard for me to give an accurate answer for your question.
But I can give three (3) guesses regarding that stone:
1. Based on internal texture and grain in the picture, it resembles to the stones found in rivers or an area with free flowing water; But its shape was done by human hands.
2. It may be a manmade stone; where original stone was pulverized and grounded to minute particles and re-form with bonding agent to give a definite shape.
3. The least is, it might be a fossilized egg of a prehistoric reptile or bird, based on the center void of the stone.
Analysis:
For no. 1 - If it is a natural stone and shaped by human hands, we can safely say it was done with a purpose. It might be a replica of an object or representation of the object your group are looking for.
For no. 2 - If you ground a piece and found the particles are mixed with other material or chemical, then it is a marker which indicates the type of object you are supposed to be found...However, prior to the discovery of this "stone" you should have had found significant markers that lead you to this particular "stone".
For no. 3 - A fossilized egg will look like stone, weight like stone and will crack like a stone. The thing that will give us hint whether it is a fossil or not, is its grain, structure and internal/external color. In that particular "stone" the void at the center is very significant, which in my opinion suggest the location of the yolk.
Another thing:
For no. 2 - If that "stone" was grounded, and re-make it as a stone that looks like an egg, there is a possibility that you have found its "yolk".
Angel_09
Greenapple,
Since I have not seen it personally, nor touch and examine it, it will be too hard for me to give an accurate answer for your question.
But I can give three (3) guesses regarding that stone:
1. Based on internal texture and grain in the picture, it resembles to the stones found in rivers or an area with free flowing water; But its shape was done by human hands.
2. It may be a manmade stone; where original stone was pulverized and grounded to minute particles and re-form with bonding agent to give a definite shape.
3. The least is, it might be a fossilized egg of a prehistoric reptile or bird, based on the center void of the stone.
Analysis:
For no. 1 - If it is a natural stone and shaped by human hands, we can safely say it was done with a purpose. It might be a replica of an object or representation of the object your group are looking for.
For no. 2 - If you ground a piece and found the particles are mixed with other material or chemical, then it is a marker which indicates the type of object you are supposed to be found...However, prior to the discovery of this "stone" you should have had found significant markers that lead you to this particular "stone".
For no. 3 - A fossilized egg will look like stone, weight like stone and will crack like a stone. The thing that will give us hint whether it is a fossil or not, is its grain, structure and internal/external color. In that particular "stone" the void at the center is very significant, which in my opinion suggest the location of the yolk.
Another thing:
For no. 2 - If that "stone" was grounded, and re-make it as a stone that looks like an egg, there is a possibility that you have found its "yolk".
Angel_09