Why skeptics doesnt show proof?

[Carl-NC]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

OK Carl.

I'm thinking to give a chance. If you like to meet with me to make a test, I will do it but you have to pay me in advance (direct deposit) $10K plus expense, find or not find, works the LRL or not. I' don't like to waste your time, neither mine. If you proof the LRL is "BS", is not my problem, I will keep using MFD's and finding gold with it anyway.

So, DO YOU ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE?

Arch

Boy-Howdy, that thar can only be described as a very well thought challenge and more than fair. What else could it be?

Tellyawut, let's dispense with all the bothersome meeting and testing... I'll send ya 10k, and all you have to do is send me a signed statement that says, "My LRL really really really works, honest and for true!" That outta be good enough, right?

Or better yet, I'll send ya the whole 25k if you send me a video of you walking around with the dowsing rods crossing. But only if the target is plainly visible! None of this "unknown target" nonsense. What more proof could a fellow ax for?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Upgraded Night Vision Monocular Digital Infrared Monocular Telescope for 100% Darkness with 8X Zoom - Grab it through Amazon!

[Saturna]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

~Saturna~

I hide a bunch of gold coins under an overturned bowl and place it among 50 identical bowls and you see if you can find it with a METAL DETECTOR.
If successful, you keep the coins & get $25,000.

Are you going to put the gold detectors favorite target under every one of the 50 bowls.?

He means aluminum.
If you put aluminum pieces of round shape, same size and also degraded to some extent under 49 of them, chances are the MD will not be able to acurately tell which one is the gold.
If it's a tone type MD, it will require an extremely experienced user with a great 'ear' and despite of that, again chances are he will get fooled also.

I'm glad someone speaks 'Art'.

Nope, no aluminum. One bowl hides the gold, 49 have nothing under. You get to use a metal detector. Would you take the challenge or not ?

 

[EE THr]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Don't press him too hard---he'll hafta think on that thar one fer awhile.








Big Four Proofs of LRLs Fraud

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

~CARL~

Since you originally directed this thread at me, it'd be rude for me not to reply. So exactly what are you asking for proof of? That is, a video of what?

This whole conversation reminds of the time a skeptic got caught palming the test silver coin at a LRL demonstration...Arty

 

[Saturna]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Heck, that's nuthin'.


This whole forum reminds me of the times you've posted photoshopped photos & staged videos.

 

[Carl-NC]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

This whole conversation reminds of the time a skeptic got caught palming the test silver coin at a LRL demonstration...Arty

Art, it wasn't the skeptic who got caught, it was the guys (Matacia and his pal) demonstrating the LRL! You don't have to take my word for it, there's a video that proofs it.

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

• Early Onset Alzheimer's is your claim..No it was not Matacia and his pal..Sorry you can not remember that hot topic on t-net..

 

[hung]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Art,
Even if it was about Matacia's video this would be pointless.
I already made a coment on that video. The images shown simply do not allow ANYONE to clearly state he was holding the coins in his hand prior to detection.
Check it for yourself and you will not be able to see anything.
The narrator and the TV guys were the ones who stated he cheated.
And a responsible and unbiased person would not claim that because there is nothing in the images except the narrator own statement.

In my opinion this was a fabrication by that TV show as those kind of shows have always to find an explanation for everything, and real fast.

With the talent Matacia have exibithed in the past training the army and all his reputation, he would not need this.
So, skeptics, try again.

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Hey hung…I am sure that Carl remembers the incident I am talking about…He is just sorry that he got caught..art

 

[architecad]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

OK Carl.

I'm thinking to give a chance. If you like to meet with me to make a test, I will do it but you have to pay me in advance (direct deposit) $10K plus expense, find or not find, works the LRL or not. I' don't like to waste your time, neither mine. If you proof the LRL is "BS", is not my problem, I will keep using MFD's and finding gold with it anyway.

So, DO YOU ACCEPT THE CHALLENGE?

Arch

Boy-Howdy, that thar can only be described as a very well thought challenge and more than fair. What else could it be?

Tellyawut, let's dispense with all the bothersome meeting and testing... I'll send ya 10k, and all you have to do is send me a signed statement that says, "My LRL really really really works, honest and for true!" That outta be good enough, right?

Or better yet, I'll send ya the whole 25k if you send me a video of you walking around with the dowsing rods crossing. But only if the target is plainly visible! None of this "unknown target" nonsense. What more proof could a fellow ax for?

I don't think you have that amount of money but I can send you that video as soon I got a MFD. About the statement, you will pay me 10k just to meet us and test a MFD, working or not, cross LRL or not. Not statement. I'm not a manufacturer. If the LRL succeed, who going to award me? Read again my prior post.

I forgot. Also, for the 25K, to be sure you're not kiding me, I like to be sure about you can pay,so, when I be ready, I would need everything about you:

Name
SS#
Address
Valid Driver lic.
Photo.
Agreement.

And you will see L-rod crossing front a target.

Arch

 

[EE THr]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Once a believer---always a believer.

 

[EE THr]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Archie---


Once, twice, three maybe time. Treasure big take you? More you?

Advise take you from true. Treasure part small. Purchase you happy kind computer biggest writing translation talking.

 

[Carl-NC]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

...but I can send you that video as soon I got a MFD.

Holly Smocks, you don't even have one?! What the heck are you complaining about? If I may offer a recommendation, I suggest you buy an H3Tec... and be sure to buy all the extras, including the Annual Insult Renewal fee. Chuckie, call this guy!

 

[woof!]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

And don't forget to ask Chuckie for a glossy paper printout of the patent, so you can brag to your friends how scientific it is.

--Toto

 

[EE THr]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Holly Smocks, you don't even have one?

Maybe they get issued trading stamps, like one for each testimonial, and five for each actual model name mentioned.

And he just hasn't quite filled up his book yet.

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Holly Smocks, you don't even have one?! What the heck are you complaining about? If I may offer a recommendation, I suggest you buy an H3Tec... and be sure to buy all the extras, including the Annual Insult Renewal fee. Chuckie, call this guy!

All of his post have been about devices that use rods…Why does the technology in the H3Tec scare you so much ?

 

[architecad]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

I forgot. Also, for the 25K, to be sure you're not kiding me, I like to be sure about you can pay,so, when I be ready, I would need everything about you:

Name
SS#
Address
Valid Driver lic.
Photo.
Agreement.

Seriously? You are asking for his Social Security number?

Well

I have to be sure he is not kidding me. He offer me 25K to do something that I did for years. If he sign it, he has to honor it.

Arch

 

[fenixdigger]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Arch;

He is kidding, just like me asking for the house keys. ( I was serious about the 1/2 bar and the detectors though) LOL

 

[aarthrj3811]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

~ Saturna~

Nope, no aluminum. One bowl hides the gold, 49 have nothing under. You get to use a metal detector. Would you take the challenge or not ?

•

No I will not..Every one knows the effects that aluminum has on conventional metal detectors..LRL’s do not have that major problem ..It is a major defect in these so called perfect treasure hunting devices right along with the lack of depth and distance..Why has thousands of former Metal Dictators users switched to LRL’s ? ..Art

 

[EE THr]

Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?

Artie---

He never mentioned aluminum.

Do you intend to bring your own aluminum?

What are you talking about?


(Translator new need you.)