When Ordinary Science Fails to Explain

[EddieR]

Yes EE posted some good stuff before, but seems to be all out, as he is now posting his opinions and trying to pass them off as fact.

Hmmm.....just off the top of my head.....check out posts #608, and #673-674 in this thread and see who is defending who. You'll see it goes both ways. I could probably dig and find a lot more.

Right! And this coming from one of the self-appointed protectors of the G&T.C., who takes pride in telling you that he chases around old houses taking pictures of spooks, goblins, ghosts and other aberrations that exist only is his twisted little closed mind.

Hey Pizza Man, have you got your pumpkin properly carved and ready... your big night is not that far off.

Uh-huh....I know you can't wait for Halloween....being a Randi Boy, you can't wait for all the little trick or treaters, can ya?

Didja notice that you are doing exactly what werleibr referenced in his post?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Minelab PRO-FIND 35 Waterproof Pinpointer Metal Detector for Experts with Tone ID & Adjustable Sensitivity - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

~werleibr~

Why not Art.. Will it do what we all think it will... PROVE THAT AN LRL IS NOT A WORKING DEVICE?
Why !!!With all the photo’s, 60 plus testimonials, movies and links to 100’s of more that your eyeballs think are fake We would not want you to get eye strain...

~EE~

If your story were true, then you would have no trouble passing Carl's test, would you. But you don't want to take Carl's test.

Why...I just posted how I can do the same test...Could you explain how come no one has taken the two fake double blind tests?

...

And you don't want to collect the 25K.

Are you sure there is 25K...Would he pay me?

...And you don't want to prove it to the World.

Why is that my responsibility?

Do you have any other fairy tales you want to tell us about?

Ditto...

Can you please tell us how many people have passed a Real Double Blind Test?

 

[werleibr]

~werleibr~

Why not Art.. Will it do what we all think it will... PROVE THAT AN LRL IS NOT A WORKING DEVICE?
Why !!!With all the photo’s, 60 plus testimonials, movies and links to 100’s of more that your eyeballs think are fake We would not want you to get eye strain...

~EE~

If your story were true, then you would have no trouble passing Carl's test, would you. But you don't want to take Carl's test.

Why...I just posted how I can do the same test...Could you explain how come no one has taken the two fake double blind tests?


Can you please tell us how many people have passed a Real Double Blind Test?

I also asked you to Film yourself taking the test that you and your wife do. You refused. and what real double blind test would you like numbers to of people passing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Any LRL manufacturer in the world.
Just following one of your mentor’s examples...
~EE~

...And you don't want to prove it to the World.

 

[EE THr]

Can you please tell us how many people have passed a Real Double Blind Test?

Let me see if I understand you correctly about this. You want to use the fact that no LRL has ever passed a scientifically controlled, random double-blind test, as a means of proving that LRLs work?

Can you please explain your reasoning on that one?

 

[EE THr]

Any LRL manufacturer in the world.
Just following one of your mentor’s examples...
~EE~

...And you don't want to prove it to the World.

Art---

You will need to go back to school and learn how to form complete sentences. Then try it again.

 

[Ted Groves]

Video the entire thing.. Set up the camera to see all the eggs and your wife hiding it along with the back door. Have her knock on the back door and then sit with her back to you to not make contact. GO find the coin that we got to watch her place under an egg and then not have contact with you and show us that you find the coin.

No Thank you...Art

I don't blame you, Art. Don't do it. 'Cause it would only prove that what you are doing with your silly dowsing wands is nothing more than "guessing" - and we all know what the results of guessing will be.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~Art~

Can you please tell us how many people have passed a Real Double Blind Test?

~EE~

Let me see if I understand you correctly about this. You want to use the fact that no LRL has ever passed a scientifically controlled, random double-blind test, as a means of proving that LRLs work?

No you do not understand..That was not the question unless you are saying “none” and of course the next question is ...Prove this claim?...Art

 

[EE THr]

~Art~

Can you please tell us how many people have passed a Real Double Blind Test?

~EE~

Let me see if I understand you correctly about this. You want to use the fact that no LRL has ever passed a scientifically controlled, random double-blind test, as a means of proving that LRLs work?

No you do not understand..That was not the question unless you are saying “none” and of course the next question is ...Prove this claim?...Art

I keep telling you art, I make no claims. I just don't believe your fariy tale claims.

He who makes the first claim, must prove it first. Nothing else matters.

 

[aarthrj3811]

http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,428232.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,410862.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,387205.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,394624.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,390641.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,409519.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,389117.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,389594.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,411065.0.html
~EE~

I keep telling you art, I make no claims. I just don't believe your fariy tale claims.

He who makes the first claim, must prove it first. Nothing else matters.

This list will prove that you have made 1000’s of claims...All one has to do is read them, that is as long as they don’t get a side ache from laughing...Art

 

[EE THr]

http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,428232.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,410862.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,387205.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,394624.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,390641.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,409519.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,389117.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,389594.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,411065.0.html
~EE~

I keep telling you art, I make no claims. I just don't believe your fariy tale claims.

He who makes the first claim, must prove it first. Nothing else matters.

This list will prove that you have made 1000’s of claims...All one has to do is read them, that is as long as they don’t get a side ache from laughing...Art

You say that LRLs work.

I say they don't.

But when you advise people to use them, I will point out that they don't work.

That's life.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

You say that LRLs work.

I say they don't.

But when you advise people to use them, I will point out that they don't work.

That's life.

It must be nice to follow the skeptics rules...I tell people how LRL’s work for me. I also tell them how to keep from being scammed just in case there is a LRL Manufacture that is trying to scam people. Out of the hundred or so manufactures in the world I have used only 7 of them. They all found and recovered gold..Those are the tools I post about.
Unlike you I have proved to myself that LRL’s find treasure..What you do is unknown to us except for the fact you have never used a LRL, never saw a a LRL and have appointed yourself as a expert....So..prove your claims Mister Expert?...Art

 

[werleibr]

~werleibr~

Why not Art.. Will it do what we all think it will... PROVE THAT AN LRL IS NOT A WORKING DEVICE?
Why !!!With all the photo’s, 60 plus testimonials, movies and links to 100’s of more that your eyeballs think are fake We would not want you to get eye strain...

~EE~

If your story were true, then you would have no trouble passing Carl's test, would you. But you don't want to take Carl's test.

Why...I just posted how I can do the same test...Could you explain how come no one has taken the two fake double blind tests?


Can you please tell us how many people have passed a Real Double Blind Test?

I also asked you to Film yourself taking the test that you and your wife do. You refused. and what real double blind test would you like numbers to of people passing?

Convienenlty passed up by art. Art you wanna prove it to all of us. FILM IT. FILM YOUR TEST.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~werleibr~

Convienenlty passed up by art. Art you wanna prove it to all of us. FILM IT. FILM YOUR TEST.

Already done that...why should I put another one on here? Keep on begging.. http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,305970.0.html
You still have not explained .. When Ordinary Science Fails to Explain...Art

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

You say that LRLs work.

I say they don't.

But when you advise people to use them, I will point out that they don't work.

That's life.

It must be nice to follow the skeptics rules...I tell people how LRL’s work for me. I also tell them how to keep from being scammed just in case there is a LRL Manufacture that is trying to scam people. Out of the hundred or so manufactures in the world I have used only 7 of them. They all found and recovered gold..Those are the tools I post about.
Unlike you I have proved to myself that LRL’s find treasure..What you do is unknown to us except for the fact you have never used a LRL, never saw a a LRL and have appointed yourself as a expert....So..prove your claims Mister Expert?...Art

You will never be able to talk your way around this one primary fact: LRLs don't work.

Their theory is bogus.

Their performance claims are bogus.

Their alleged electronics are bogus.


ref: Can You Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

You will never be able to talk your way around this one primary fact: LRLs don't work.

Their theory is bogus.

Their performance claims are bogus.

Their alleged electronics are bogus

.

We keep hearing your claims..
Where is your proof that LRL’s don’t find treasure? Our proof is here.
Could you please tell which make and model of treasure hunting LRL is bogus?
Could you tell us which performance claim is bogus?
Which LRL has bogus electronics?

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

You will never be able to talk your way around this one primary fact: LRLs don't work.

Their theory is bogus.

Their performance claims are bogus.

Their alleged electronics are bogus

.

We keep hearing your claims..
Where is your proof that LRL’s don’t find treasure? Our proof is here.
Could you please tell which make and model of treasure hunting LRL is bogus?
Could you tell us which performance claim is bogus?
Which LRL has bogus electronics?

You have claimed that LRLs work. But you refuse any attempt to prove it to the World.

Anything else is just nonsense babblings.

It's up to you to answer the one big question---

ref: Can You Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE~

You have claimed that LRLs work. But you refuse any attempt to prove it to the World.

Yes I have said that the 7 different lrl’s that I have used all located and led me to gold recoveries...That is not a claim. It is a fact...I said I would consider participating in a Scientific Test if one was ever presented to me.

Anything else is just nonsense babblings.

Their theory is bogus.
Their performance claims are bogus.
Their alleged electronics are bogus.

Yes but it is your babbling

It's up to you to answer the one big question---

It may get answered if anyone knew what your one big question was..Art

 

[EE THr]

~EE~

You have claimed that LRLs work. But you refuse any attempt to prove it to the World.

Yes I have said that the 7 different lrl’s that I have used all located and led me to gold recoveries...That is not a claim. It is a fact...I said I would consider participating in a Scientific Test if one was ever presented to me.

Anything else is just nonsense babblings.

Their theory is bogus.
Their performance claims are bogus.
Their alleged electronics are bogus.

Yes but it is your babbling

It's up to you to answer the one big question---

It may get answered if anyone knew what your one big question was..Art

Here's the question (again)---

Can You Scientifically Prove to the World That LRLs Work?

That you can't prove your fantasy claims, is your problem.

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

HIO EE, you mean peer reviewed data, or The bell you mentioned is that the one allegely found near the Sonoran border in 1896? That had Tayopa Guaynopa Guaynopita Sonora. Tres Minerales Del Mundo written on it?
?

Don Jose de la Mancha?