aarthrj3811
Gold Member
286 posts and the skeptics still have not put a reasonable explanation of what started this thread..I did not think that Randi’s spell could possibly be this strong..Art
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
fenixdigger said:It seems they are hung up about the dowsing thing. How about an explanation on how this can reach over 20 miles?
I know, take a wire and put it around the sample. Or take a calculator and put under it, but don't turn it on.
I'm sure there is some little weasel excuse "I can't do it, I'm scared"
I call your bluff --SHO-NUFF
aarthrj3811 said:286 posts and the skeptics still have not put a reasonable explanation of what started this thread..I did not think that Randi’s spell could possibly be this strong..Art
Still no answer about how Miroslaw Magola did his thing…If youn don’t understand what your “eyeballs” see it is a fantasty just like LRL’sWe have said, time after time, that hung-up is lost in a fantasy world---that's what started this whole thread.
Just maybe the gold/silver ions enter through the open side of the of the ion chamber..ArtI wonder...how do those gold/silver ions meander up that solid "draw tube" into that "ionic chamber"
aarthrj3811 said:~EE~Still no answer about how Miroslaw Magola did his thing…If youn don’t understand what your “eyeballs” see it is a fantasty just like LRL’sWe have said, time after time, that hung-up is lost in a fantasy world---that's what started this whole thread.
aarthrj3811 said:~SWR~
Just maybe the gold/silver ions enter through the open side of the of the ion chamber..ArtI wonder...how do those gold/silver ions meander up that solid "draw tube" into that "ionic chamber"
SWR said:aarthrj3811 said:~SWR~
Just maybe the gold/silver ions enter through the open side of the of the ion chamber..ArtI wonder...how do those gold/silver ions meander up that solid "draw tube" into that "ionic chamber"
:::chortles::: That was funny, coming from Art (he more than likely believes the cut-open side is supposed to be open)
EE THr said:SWR said:aarthrj3811 said:~SWR~
Just maybe the gold/silver ions enter through the open side of the of the ion chamber..ArtI wonder...how do those gold/silver ions meander up that solid "draw tube" into that "ionic chamber"
:::chortles::: That was funny, coming from Art (he more than likely believes the cut-open side is supposed to be open)
...Yup!
So you are saying that somebody played with the device ? Can I ask you who destroyed the chamber (if it is an ion chamber) before taking the photo?:::chortles::: That was funny, coming from Art (he more than likely believes the cut-open side is supposed to be open)
Go ahead and add it to your opinion list..ArtI hope I don't have to add to the Patterns list, "The CA makes you feel so sorry for him, that you want to quit catching him in illogical explanations."
aarthrj3811 said:~SWR~
So you are saying that somebody played with the device ? Can I ask you who destroyed the chamber (if it is an ion chamber) before taking the photo?:::chortles::: That was funny, coming from Art (he more than likely believes the cut-open side is supposed to be open)
~EE~
Go ahead and add it to your opinion list..ArtI hope I don't have to add to the Patterns list, "The CA makes you feel so sorry for him, that you want to quit catching him in illogical explanations."
One of skep Carl's favorite mambos fits perfectly in your case for not being able to produce either a rebuttal or explanation:Rudy(CA) said:hung said:FACTS:
1 - Skeptics were not able to provide a scientific explanation to Miroslaw Magola's case.
2 - Skeptics were not able to refute my claims. This evidences they either agree with me or lack the scientific data for a rebuttal.
3 - Dr. Rudy was the only one who said that could refute my claims. He lied.
Regarding fact#2, it's interesting to note that in various threads skeptics keep preaching about 'real' science, as believed by them, against a supposed 'pseudoscience' that they claim LRL proponents and manufacturers use.
In fact#2 lies the proof and not only the evidence in this case, that they get 'trapped' in an unsolved contradiction. In logic, would be that assertive A or B will not provide C (a rebuttal).
So, it's over. They might continue repeling and oposing LRL concepts as much as they wish. It's part or democracy and also part of capitalism's dirty rules when one side feels threatened.
Truth is that they have completely lost the cause to use Science as their alibi to support their agenda from now on.
It's up to them choose how serious they wish to continue to be taken if they insist.
Just for the record.
Dr. Hung, your immediate assumption of Miroslaw's tricks as constituting proof of human magnetism does show a worrisome
flaw in your powers of deductive reasoning and critical thinking.
SQuote
:::chortles::: That was funny, coming from Art (he more than likely believes the cut-open side is supposed to be open)
~EE~o you are saying that somebody played with the device ? Can I ask you who destroyed the chamber (if it is an ion chamber) before taking the photo?
~hung~That is a typical method of illustrating the inside of a device. It's called a "cutaway view," and it is recognized World wide as a normal way to show the inner contents of something.
Whoever did it, did a pretty good job of it, too. Nice and neat, and it shows everything in perspective.
~SWR~One of skep Carl's favorite mambos fits perfectly in your case for not being able to produce either a rebuttal or explanation:
Sure...it was an Electrical Engineer down in Mexico. His name is Alex.
Now...armed with that information, are now suddenly more intelligent and able to grasp the concept of the text?
hung said:One of skep Carl's favorite mambos fits perfectly in your case for not being able to produce either a rebuttal or explanation:Rudy(CA) said:hung said:FACTS:
1 - Skeptics were not able to provide a scientific explanation to Miroslaw Magola's case.
2 - Skeptics were not able to refute my claims. This evidences they either agree with me or lack the scientific data for a rebuttal.
3 - Dr. Rudy was the only one who said that could refute my claims. He lied.
Regarding fact#2, it's interesting to note that in various threads skeptics keep preaching about 'real' science, as believed by them, against a supposed 'pseudoscience' that they claim LRL proponents and manufacturers use.
In fact#2 lies the proof and not only the evidence in this case, that they get 'trapped' in an unsolved contradiction. In logic, would be that assertive A or B will not provide C (a rebuttal).
So, it's over. They might continue repeling and oposing LRL concepts as much as they wish. It's part or democracy and also part of capitalism's dirty rules when one side feels threatened.
Truth is that they have completely lost the cause to use Science as their alibi to support their agenda from now on.
It's up to them choose how serious they wish to continue to be taken if they insist.
Just for the record.
Dr. Hung, your immediate assumption of Miroslaw's tricks as constituting proof of human magnetism does show a worrisome
flaw in your powers of deductive reasoning and critical thinking.
'CAN'T DO IT'.
Then why are you still posting about a subject that you don’t care about ?307 posts and nobody actually cares about Miroslaw Magola or his claims
~SWR~Then why are you still posting about a subject that you don’t care about ?
Good answer. I take that as you do not how the the experiment was done..Artoops....308 posts now....and still, nobody caring!
Rudy(CA) said:Make that 310 posts and I certainly don't care about Miroslaw Magola or his claims.