sdcfia
Silver Member
- Sep 28, 2014
- 3,747
- 9,102
- Primary Interest:
- Other
If one claims to be an expert at analyzing facts and evidence, I would then question them when they fall short of doing so when it comes to their own claims, even as they try to hold others to a different standard. The same thing would apply when they present their opinion and the hearsay they wish to focus upon as "factual evidence". Like I said, round and round we go.
Yup - a psychologist. Round and round, all right. Please ignore me and go about your business if this causes you angst. Or - add something to the conversation.