Oroblanco
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2005
- Messages
- 7,841
- Reaction score
- 9,872
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- DAKOTA TERRITORY
- Detector(s) used
- Tesoro Lobo Supertraq, (95%) Garrett Scorpion (5%)
Gollum wrote
This is what I meant about the cloth duplicate very easily growing into a new, separate and un-founded legend; the source that mentions it does not say it IS a pillowcase, only that it is the SIZE of a pillowcase. Once we tack the name "pillowcase" on to it, then new assumptions lead to new (and erroneous) conclusions, like the pillowcase must have been used to pack the stone tablets in it, etc when really all we had to start with was a cloth duplicate, which may have been the original or may have been a copy of the stones, the size of a pillowcase but not stated to BE a pillow case. I know that I appear to be "picky" about this and I don't mean to be, just that it looks like this cloth duplicate is quickly developing into a new (and false) legend just from our speculations.
Have to agree in part, and disagree in part with Don Jose, disagree that Reavis is a logical origin for several reasons, firstly that no Peralta name appears on them and secondly that there is no mention of any stone maps in his court case, or before Tumlinson purportedly found them for that matter. I agree that it is not 100% established that the stone maps relate to the Superstitions, in fact they will fit several other areas of the southwest, one perfectly in fact, and it was an assumption that led to people thinking they must apply to the Superstitions when they were not even found in that mountain range but outside of them. No offense to Joe, for his theory of fitting the stone maps works about the best I have seen applied to the Superstitions, but it may well be a case of shoe-fitting; especially since none of the obvious landmarks of the Superstitions are clearly and undeniably demarcated on the stone maps. Where is Four Peaks, Weavers Needle, Miners Needle, Picket Post and several others, shown unmistakably on the stone maps?
As for dismissing Tumlinson as the creator of the stone maps, regardless of whatever conversation has been reported from him or about him etc, are we to just conclude that it was purely coincidental that Tumlinson had a habit of carving stones, and with Spanish treasure themes to boot? I am sorry but this is just too much for me, as much as I still hold Storm as a potential candidate, the fact that Tumlinson did in fact carve Spanish treasure themed stones is hard to dismiss as pure coincidence for me.
Good luck and good hunting to you all, I hope you find the treasures that you seek.
Oroblanco
PS Mike we missed you at the rendezvous, hope you will make it to one some one of these years before we are all gone!

My best guess on the pillowcase would be one of two possibilities <snip>
This is what I meant about the cloth duplicate very easily growing into a new, separate and un-founded legend; the source that mentions it does not say it IS a pillowcase, only that it is the SIZE of a pillowcase. Once we tack the name "pillowcase" on to it, then new assumptions lead to new (and erroneous) conclusions, like the pillowcase must have been used to pack the stone tablets in it, etc when really all we had to start with was a cloth duplicate, which may have been the original or may have been a copy of the stones, the size of a pillowcase but not stated to BE a pillow case. I know that I appear to be "picky" about this and I don't mean to be, just that it looks like this cloth duplicate is quickly developing into a new (and false) legend just from our speculations.
Have to agree in part, and disagree in part with Don Jose, disagree that Reavis is a logical origin for several reasons, firstly that no Peralta name appears on them and secondly that there is no mention of any stone maps in his court case, or before Tumlinson purportedly found them for that matter. I agree that it is not 100% established that the stone maps relate to the Superstitions, in fact they will fit several other areas of the southwest, one perfectly in fact, and it was an assumption that led to people thinking they must apply to the Superstitions when they were not even found in that mountain range but outside of them. No offense to Joe, for his theory of fitting the stone maps works about the best I have seen applied to the Superstitions, but it may well be a case of shoe-fitting; especially since none of the obvious landmarks of the Superstitions are clearly and undeniably demarcated on the stone maps. Where is Four Peaks, Weavers Needle, Miners Needle, Picket Post and several others, shown unmistakably on the stone maps?
As for dismissing Tumlinson as the creator of the stone maps, regardless of whatever conversation has been reported from him or about him etc, are we to just conclude that it was purely coincidental that Tumlinson had a habit of carving stones, and with Spanish treasure themes to boot? I am sorry but this is just too much for me, as much as I still hold Storm as a potential candidate, the fact that Tumlinson did in fact carve Spanish treasure themed stones is hard to dismiss as pure coincidence for me.
Good luck and good hunting to you all, I hope you find the treasures that you seek.
Oroblanco
PS Mike we missed you at the rendezvous, hope you will make it to one some one of these years before we are all gone!

