Rebel - KGC
Gold Member
- Jun 15, 2007
- 21,663
- 14,726
I guess what I am after is the motive to publish the ciphers.
L.C.
Eh...?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess what I am after is the motive to publish the ciphers.
L.C.
Is there any evidence outside of 1885 Beale that Beale and Morriss did indeed have actual contact? Or was their inclusion a definitely intentional literary device to provide believability in the story, the ciphers(the solved cipher also induces believability), and the treasure?They're definitely intentional, designed "constructs" by the unknown author, that's for sure, as was connexions. At least you agree on that much.
...and the real motive to publish the 1885 Beale Papers.I guess what I am after is the motive to publish the ciphers.
L.C.
I guess what I am after is the motive to publish the ciphers.
L.C.
Is there any evidence outside of 1885 Beale that Beale and Morriss did indeed have actual contact? Or was their inclusion a definitely intentional literary device to provide believability in the story, the ciphers(the solved cipher also induces believability), and the treasure?
If Beale and Morriss were used as a literary device, and their interaction never occurred, but is the very basis of the Beale treasure story , then the entire work, including the Beale expedition, the ciphers, and the treasure would be considered fruit from the poisoned tree.NONE; NO "contact" b/c they BOTH were literary "devices" to tell a story; I like what Richard/Brad said... something like the only "worth" of Thomas Beale... is the "USE" of his name (Fincastle, Va.). Robert MORRISS is based on former Mayor of Lynchburg, Va. (1813), and his wife Sarah. FIRST "use" of Robert MORRISS "story" is by Mrs. Cabell, in her "book" (really papers, NOT to be published as a book), 1858. She died before the Committee of 1882, so she either talked to someone, prior to her death... OR! Her "book" was utilized for the section of Beale PAPERS, on Robert & Sarah MORRISS.
If Beale and Morriss were used as a literary device, and their interaction never occurred, but is the very basis of the Beale treasure story , then the entire work, including the Beale expedition, the ciphers, and the treasure would be considered fruit from the poisoned tree.
Which brings us back to a western/treasure dime novel( similar to what Sherman wrote)that sold in Lynchberg for 50 cents a copy.
If Beale and Morriss were used as a literary device, and their interaction never occurred, but is the very basis of the Beale treasure story , then the entire work, including the Beale expedition, the ciphers, and the treasure would be considered fruit from the poisoned tree.
Which brings us back to a western/treasure dime novel( similar to what Sherman wrote)that sold in Lynchberg for 50 cents a copy.
Then again, if such an interaction did occur (early 1800s), then they wouldn't have advertised it. The interaction, by it's very nature, would have been covert.
In 1885 Beale it was mentioned that the ladies found Beale to be handsome.So, according to the pamphlet, it was not covert.Then again, if such an interaction did occur (early 1800s), then they wouldn't have advertised it. The interaction, by it's very nature, would have been covert.
It does bring us back to Hutter, Sherman, and Ward, and the events at Danville, April, 1865. Maybe the word "connexion" directs one to the French copy of Vattel's LAW OF NATIONS that was given to E S Hutter by CSA Sec of State Judah P Benjamin.
In 1885 Beale it was mentioned that the ladies found Beale to be handsome.So, according to the pamphlet, it was not covert.
It does bring us back to Hutter, Sherman, and Ward, and the events at Danville, April, 1865. Maybe the word "connexion" directs one to the French copy of Vattel's LAW OF NATIONS that was given to E S Hutter by CSA Sec of State Judah P Benjamin.
In 1885 Beale it was mentioned that the ladies found Beale to be handsome.So, according to the pamphlet, it was not covert.