Gold Maven said:There's no way they were fishing sinkers.
Fish were mainly trapped, speared, or netted. If weights were needed for nets they would be large soft rocks easily notched. Plummets show a large amount of work, which is not required for a fishing sinker.
These had to spin in some way, because of their symmetry.
The charm stone theory is funny, I have always been amused by learned men that can't figure out what something was used for, so it becomes "ceremonial".
I'm sure there were certain rituals preformed in prehistoric man's life, but mostly they were hunting, gathering, and trying to keep the wolf from the door...literally.
NC field hunter said:Just thought of this!lol! When it comes to a wolf at the tee-pee, religion or a charm stone is the only option!lol! Only one I see any way.
GatorBoy said:Funny but fire and stone is way more efficient.
Gold Maven said:I'm just saying if they needed a sinker, any old stone would do.
Try shaping a stone in the shape of a plummet with out power tools. I bet you wouldn't toss it out in a river. The tiny notch doesn't look like a good anchor point for a sinker, better a hole or deep notches.
One of the appealing aspects of relic collecting, is we don't know everything, and it is fun trying to put yourself in prehistoric man's place, and try to figure things like this out.
Banner stones were thought to be pendants, until an atlatl was found intact in a Pennsylvania rock shelter.
Perhaps something similar will happen with the plummet
Edmundruffin said:Anyone pondered the thought they were articles of female self gratification? Makes as much sense as some opinions. Could explain the drilled hole or groove, attached to a string.................................
unclemac said:no they used these....
unclemac said:no they used these....
tomclark said:I don't think they fished with this, or used it as a plumb-bob, or used it as a loom weight......
I've found a lot of plummets that are broken at the groove, guess that's more a function of the weakness of the spot, but maybe a clue to usage??....
GatorBoy said:I think I'm with Edmundruffin on that one Tom.
Whatever those are.. they're not plummets.
GatorBoy said:Because I'm assuming that the I.D. was given in part because of the damage visible if you look closely from banging into one another that is common use wear for bolas and they are a well document type for that region. I should also add... after the research I have put into this I believe the artifacts that I am referring to with the carved grooves are a different artifact than the ones with the drilled holes.