The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer

[EE THr]

good morming EE: you posted --> P.S. It would help you stay on topic if you actually had an LRL. Then you could actually say something relevant
*************

May I ask which model do you have??

Don Jose de La Mancha

Why don't you just ask your crystal ball?


So, you are really asking me if I would pay money for something which clearly can't work, and in addition to the obvious, has never been proven to work even when offered $25,000.00 in Carl's test?

Big J, on the other hand "believes" in LRLs. And so would certainly consider it to be will worth any amount of money, to lead to vast treasures, right?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Diving for Pleasure and Treasure - Grab it through Amazon!

[EE THr]

Big J---

I'm not an LRL promoter, like you are, so I don't need one.

A little more thinking on your part, and you might have figured that one out.

You should have an LRL, so you can answer the question of the topic. Remember the topic? Do I need to post a link to the definition of "topic"?


Oops, I'm sorry, I forgot that---

Scientific facts are sociological artifacts.

Your idea of reality, is that it's a figment of imagination, and nothing is real. So topics don't really exist. Wow---What a space cadet you turned out to be!









Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Probably a waste of time, but,,,

For LRL users;


When you see a slightly different answer from LRL users there are reasons, here's a few.

Where Art mostly hunts it is dry, high altitude, wide open spaces, near desert conditions. Art likes to hunt for natural gold, buried forever, never disturbed.

I hunt in a wet, near sea level, jungle like, highly mineralized area. i hunt for man made gold items, buried 100 to 300 yrs, sometimes in containers.

This causes me to answer the question differently than Art or someone else. The basics are the same(I know, they don't work)
but the anomalies are very different.

This forces a change in procedure and equipment setup. Good luck

 

[aarthrj3811]

You got LT..I lived in California most of my life…the gold country is mostly steep and heavy forested. You will find that most of the gold will be found between 2500 and 3500 feet of elevation. Very large rivers and streams..With the old rod style LRL’s and MFD’s when you found a signal you had no clue what was between you and the gold..Rivers, buck Brush and steep canyons were normal..With the new non rod device I could tell how far the target was from me and look at the map and tell where I had to go..Since I knew the weight of the target I could make an informed decision as to whether the target was worth the effort.
When I moved to Nevada I had to learn what the device was telling me..Getting used to the dusty dry mountains was the hard part..I have found that in Nevada the minerals seem to change every 100 feet. There is silver every where in the bedrock so I do not hunt for silver very much..Now hunting in the deserts of southern Utah is a whole differnt ball game... Adapting to the area is just part of Treasure Hunting…Art

 

[EE THr]

team fenix(es) & artie---

Too bad you can't actually supply any rational answers to the questions of topic.

In case you forgot what they were, here here they are---



The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer


1. Why don't you take Carl's test?

2. What do you feel is wrong with Carl's test?

3. What do you think is a fair test?



Please remember, I included the word "rational," above. If you don't know the definition, I can help you with that.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

Since I do not own an LRL and have made no claims, just refuted some others' claims, and backed that up with references when applicable....

Wrong again, stogie sucker.

The only claims that are being made on the entire LRL section, are being made by the LRL promoters, which includes you.

You have refuted nothing---but have only made ad hominem attacks against the claim challengers, in a lame effort to pull the discussion off topic, and take the LRL promoters off the spot.

Sorry, won't work anymore.

Get back on topic, or get off the keyboard.

Being knowledgeable in electronics is all I need to discuss the so-called "electronics" of the LRLs, which won't work.

You have no knowledge of electronics, and cannot even join the other LRL promoters in claiming that you find treasure with these phony devices.

So, what do you bring to the table here, besides your trolling interference, disguised as amateur non-scientific personal insults?



Internet Troll, Wikipedia.

In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

And I've already answered your questions. I've outlined my concept of your rationality in red below....

side note* Rationality: a concept of reason, Wikipedia
Concept: a cognitive unit of meaning—an abstract idea or a mental symbol

Your attempted manipulation of the meaning, by trying to combine two definitions, is merely a weak attempt to confuse. No wonder you idolize the eugenicists. They're nuts too!


Rational, Dictionary.com

agreeable to reason; reasonable; sensible: a rational plan for economic development.


Your efforts to claim that reality is fictional, shows that nothing you say can be depended upon as being sane. Your version of reality is that black is the same as white, up is the same as down, and everything means nothing. A real sick-iatrist!

By your own definition, the questions you pose are unanswerable.

They are very simple questions. But I'm not surprised that they have confused you.

That said, my "live gal opinions" are as follows......

#1. Because I think it's a farce.

#2. I think it's a farce.

#3. I think the concept of a "fair test" is a farce.

Thinking a fair test is a farce, is just an extension of your inability to relate to reality.

Besides, these questions were asked of LRLers. You don't even own one. So you cannot provide any answers that would be relevant.


And, since you supposedly don't have anything to do with LRLs, or their makers ( ), what are you even doing on these threads?

Oh, that's right, you're a professional Internet Troll.

"In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion."

And obviously a #24 on the link below.







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

They can’t Judy..they are now claiming that they are not skeptics..My guess would be that their lack of knowledge about the subject dictates another change of strategy..Guess what..Their lack of proof is still at the forefront of all their post.. Note that the insult thread is disappearing now on a regular Basis..Art

 

[EE THr]

Since I do not own an LRL and have made no claims, just refuted some others' claims, and backed that up with references when applicable....

Wrong again, stogie sucker.

The only claims that are being made on the entire LRL section, are being made by the LRL promoters, which includes you.

Ah, the insults again! Insults are used when someone has run out of actual data, and they are a last ditch effort to win by intimidation.



Alright. You claim that I have made claims promoting LRLs. Prove it. Post quotes of these supposed claims.

By not posting them you are proving to everyone who reads this forum what a total BS Con Artist you really are.


Don't be a doof---show the proof!

Nope I said that your are included amongst the LRL promoters.

It's obvious, because you only insult the LRL challengers, and encourage the LRL promoters.

Anybody can read all of your posts. They are all trolling, all as it says just above.

You wrote your own posts, so who's fault is that?





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

They can’t Judy..they are now claiming that they are not skeptics..My guess would be that their lack of knowledge about the subject dictates another change of strategy..Guess what..Their lack of proof is still at the forefront of all their post.. Note that the insult thread is disappearing now on a regular Basis..Art

Wrong again, artie.

Don't make the claim, if you can't take the blame.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

"The only claims that are being made on the entire LRL section, are being made by the LRL promoters, which includes you."


Ah, the insults again! Insults are used when someone has run out of actual data, and they are a last ditch effort to win by intimidation.

So, you consider that being referred to as an LRL promoter, is an insult?

Well, that's a start, in coming over from the dark side.

But you will need to put a lot more effort into it.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

~EE THr~

It's obvious, because you only insult the LRL challengers, and encourage the LRL promoters.

There goes the White Hat and Silver bullets syndrome again.

Wrong again, artie.

Please explain what error I made in my statement ?

 

[EE THr]

~EE THr~

It's obvious, because you only insult the LRL challengers, and encourage the LRL promoters.

There goes the White Hat and Silver bullets syndrome again.

Wrong again, artie.

Please explain what error I made in my statement ?

artie---

You need to understand that the whole topic here is asking you a question.

You are merely trying to avoid answering, by asking silly questions yourself.

How about some rational answers to the topic questions, instead of your Straw Man distractions?







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[fenixdigger]

Judy I have to disagree. No way that will happen. the compulsion won't allow it. Insult ---Attack---Challenge just watch.

 

[EE THr]

Wrong.

You claimed that I have made claims promoting LRLs.

And calling everyone who disagrees with you and questions your reasoning an Internet Troll not only further demonstrates your lack of cognitive skills, but also confirms some points made by Fenix in previous posts.

Nope, I merely included you in the LRL promoters. Learn to read. Actually, you are making their claims, because you are in favor of the LRL promoters. That means that you vouch for their claims.

If you are not an LRL promoter, and you obviously aren't a challenger, the what exactly are you doing here, if you are not an Internet Troll?





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

"The only claims that are being made on the entire LRL section, are being made by the LRL promoters, which includes you."


Ah, the insults again! Insults are used when someone has run out of actual data, and they are a last ditch effort to win by intimidation.

So, you consider that being referred to as an LRL promoter, is an insult?

Well, that's a start, in coming over from the dark side.

But you will need to put a lot more effort into it.

Nah......you left out the insult in this post to make yourself look better.....but it's still there in the posts I quoted.
Just another sneaky way for you to make more insults, and totally deserving of the lack of respect you say I show the skeptics.
I have yet to be insulted by any of the LRL promoters/users. Perhaps you should learn from that example.
If you want respect from others, then show some respect for them. It's that simple. Even you can do it.

Like I said before, I have never insulted anybody first.

So, don't dish it out if you can't take it.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[EE THr]

I'll try again---

The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer


1. Why don't you take Carl's test?

2. What do you feel is wrong with Carl's test?

3. What do you think is a fair test?


I'm asking for solid answers, please. No fairyland mumbo-jumbo. We all know the difference.






Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's double-blind test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[Saturna]

Judy I have to disagree. No way that will happen. the compulsion won't allow it. Insult ---Attack ---Challengejust watch.

Coming from the guy that had a final warning from the mod for that very thing. Funny stuff.

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

Sigh, that's mi Luv judy * * * * * Beauty and brains.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[fenixdigger]

Sat. you are right. Just for a little research project, put mine side by side with some of the other ones with constant insults and name calling and see what shakes out.

Did you see anyone get blasted for calling me trailer trash? There's a lot of reference to "trolls", see any heat? This list could go way long.
I took it as a compliment that someone was rattled enough to stoop to that. Proved a lot, just as most of the other cutsie pie ones do. Ever see any useable info in any of them Strictly confrontational and self serving.

I'll go so far as to say that if I went back and looked at the ignored posts, there would be NO instructional or useable info there.
Just a collection of insults, name calling, demands, and faked interest just to argue. Sure hate that I missed that.

I was able to pass the time working on some projects that are mind blowing. (Well according to my little circle.) Worked out great.