The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer

[Saturna]

HI I certainly can dowse, I have proven it quite conclusively, but I am not consistant
or have enough faith in my ability to perform under testing conditions

The above statement is conclusively inconclusive.

Yet predictable.
I wonder if the same prizes were offered for metal detecting, if he would suddenly be able to 'perform' for that ?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Agony and Death on a Gold Rush Steamer: The Disastrous Sinking of the Side-Wheeler Yankee Blade - Grab it through Amazon!

[aarthrj3811]

~Saturna~

Yet predictable.
I wonder if the same prizes were offered for metal detecting, if he would suddenly be able to 'perform' for that ?

Great Claim..Could you please explain how we are able to locate Gold and Silver with our devices if they are not Metal Detectors ?..Art

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

Hi rudy & randy sta: you posted --> quote Jose --HI I certainly can dowse, I have proven it quite conclusively, but I am not consistant
or have enough faith in my ability to perform under testing conditions
++++++++
you posted -->The above statement is conclusively inconclusive.
*************
Hmm, consistency depends upon the length and repetitiveness of the test. I might fail the first two times, then hit with the next 100, but in the interests and intention of the test, I would Have failed, no??

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[Saturna]

Hmm, consistency depends upon the length and repetitiveness of the test. I might fail the first two times, then hit with the next 100, but in the interests and intention of the test, I would Have failed, no??

Don Jose de La Mancha

Nope, you couldn't do better than random guessing with dowsing. You would never 'hit' the next 100.

If you had a metal detector, though, you would pass the test consistently, but where is the fantasy dreaming in that ?



(sorry Arthur, your LRL only locates metal in your dreams)

 

[Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp]

hi sat you posted -->Nope, you couldn't do better than random guessing with dowsing. You would never 'hit' the next 100.
******************
Hmm doesn't that presuppose a failure ?? Not scientific I would say.

Don Jose de La Mancha

 

[EE THr]

HI I cerainly can dowse, I have proven it quite conclusively, but I am not consistant
or have enough faith in my ability to perform under testing conditions which will be
subjected to dual doubts, mine in my ability under to do so under the circumstances
and the testor's doubt, visually reenforcing mine.

RDT---

But would you bend a couple of welding rods, and then sell them to someone for 2,000 % markup, implying that they will work to find treasure for everyone?

 

[Saturna]

hi sat you posted -->Nope, you couldn't do better than random guessing with dowsing. You would never 'hit' the next 100.
******************
Hmm doesn't that presuppose a failure ?? Not scientific I would say.

Don Jose de La Mancha

Factual nevertheless.

I also pre-suppose that you can't fly simply by flapping your arms. How'd I do ? Was I right ?

 

[EE THr]

We can add another question to the list of what the LRLers won't answer.


1. None of them will explain, step by step, how their circuits work. This is common practice when engineers write up a real manual for a piece of equipment, so the pseudoscience Wiz Kids amonst them should have no trouble explaining this.

2. They will not answer the challenge to show the actual radiated signal on an oscilloscope. This is very simple to do with any other transmitting device. But since there is no signal, it is impossible to do with an LRL.


LRLers: Don't make the claim, if you can't take the blame.

 

[aarthrj3811]

~Saturna~

Nope, you couldn't do better than random guessing with dowsing. You would never 'hit' the next 100.

I have ask the skeptics for over 9 years to prove that claim..Are you volunteering to answer it?
~EE THr~

None of them will explain, step by step, how their circuits work. This is common practice when engineers write up a real manual for a piece of equipment, so the pseudoscience Wiz Kids amonst them should have no trouble explaining this.

Don’t look at me as I am just an owner/operator of these devices..I can not tell you if any of the manufactures even have engineering reports…So if you can prove this claim let’s get her done

They will not answer the challenge to show the actual radiated signal on an oscilloscope. This is very simple to do with any other transmitting device.

Yes..Every Treasure Hunter has a couple of Oscilloscope’s in his tool bag

But since there is no signal, it is impossible to do with an LRL.

So can you prove this claim?

 

[EE THr]

artie---

Claim proved by SWR in another thread.

You asked for it, you got it.

 

[aarthrj3811]

Cla

im proved by SWR in another thread.

Another claim..You guys are sure putting a lot of claims on here

 

[EE THr]

artie---

And all of ours are getting proved.

But none of yours are.

Too bad.

But I hear that you have agreed to Carl's test, and are going to take it. That's great! It will end all the debates!

I'm sure that everyone is looking forward to that. I know that I am.

Thanks!

 

[aarthrj3811]

And all of ours are getting proved.

But none of yours are.

Too bad.

But I hear that you have agreed to Carl's test, and are going to take it. That's great! It will end all the debates!

I'm sure that everyone is looking forward to that. I know that I am.

Thanks!

It is a common psychological problem in that insecure people tend to project their personal deficiencies unto another in self defense, they are sure trying to pass theirs lack of knowledge over to you

 

[EE THr]

And all of ours are getting proved.

But none of yours are.

Too bad.

But I hear that you have agreed to Carl's test, and are going to take it. That's great! It will end all the debates!

I'm sure that everyone is looking forward to that. I know that I am.

Thanks!

It is a common psychological problem in that insecure people tend to project their personal deficiencies unto another in self defense, they are sure trying to pass theirs lack of knowledge over to you

Same old tactic of "When you can't answer the question, just post something irrelevant to bait the person to go off topic."


It won't work.


Your failure to take the test is the proof that your LRL won't work.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Your failure to take the test is the proof that your LRL won't work.

Is that all the proof that you assume you have?

 

[EE THr]

artie---

You have admitted that LRLs are the claim, therefore it's up to you to show proof that yours works.







Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

You have admitted that LRLs are the claim, therefore it's up to you to show proof that yours works.

Could you please explain why it is my responsibility to do this ?

 

[EE THr]

You have admitted that LRLs are the claim, therefore it's up to you to show proof that yours works.

Could you please explain why it is my responsibility to do this ?

Bacause you claim that your LRL works. And you've shown that LRLs are the claim.

So you are responsible for providing proof that your LRL works. If you don't, then you are admitting that your LRL doesn't work.

Either way if fine with me.

Don't make the claim, if you can't take the blame.




Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?

 

[aarthrj3811]

Bacause you claim that your LRL works. And you've shown that LRLs are the claim.

So you are responsible for providing proof that your LRL works. If you don't, then you are admitting that your LRL doesn't work.

Either way if fine with me.

Don't make the claim, if you can't take the blame.

Reruns are boring..no need to watch them

 

[EE THr]

Bacause you claim that your LRL works. And you've shown that LRLs are the claim.

So you are responsible for providing proof that your LRL works. If you don't, then you are admitting that your LRL doesn't work.

Either way if fine with me.

Don't make the claim, if you can't take the blame.

Reruns are boring..no need to watch them

That is the price one pays for ignoring the truth.





Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take Carl's test?
ref: Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?