The Peralta Stones

cactusjumper---

The only thing that still eats on me is how well the horse head matched that topo map! Man, that is really weird!

Then I saw what I called the gnome. I followed the same "rules" in outlining it as was done with the horse head, that is using just the heavy lines. So, if one were to consider the horse head in any way valid as being somehow related to the horse (side of the) stone, then the gnome guy should be considered just as valid, I would think.

So if the horse head is just a "million-to-one" coincidence, then the gnome guy increases that to what, a TRILLion-to-one coincidence?

The hat on the gnome guy could be compared to the "witches" hat, in that it is narrow (but not pointed) at the top, and the lines for the brim are there. But there is an even greater resemblance if you look at the hats that some of the guys are wearing in the book De Re Metallica (pub. 1557), without the brim.

That whole deal with the topo map is pretty strange, unless the map has been somehow "fudged." But if it is dated correctly, and it was altered to match the horse stone, what would that imply?

All the logic that I can figure on it just goes round-and-round!

:coffee2:
 

EE,

Try using Aylor's arch for the eye of the horse (Caballo Ojo). Using that as a reference, see if you can draw the horse's head. Look for the ears to show up around Bull Pass.

From "hiker's Guide to the Superstition Wilderness", by Jack Carlson and Elizabeth Stewart, we get this:

"He also said some story tellers call it the Eye of the Horse or Caballo Ojo.....Tom Kollenborn.

Some might find the "Caballo" of Chuck Aylor, quite a coincidence. Added to his favorite passage from Shakespeare, and it might cause some small amount of suspicion. "You would play upon me; you would seem to know my stops; you would pluck out the heart of my mystery; you would sound me from my lowest note to the top of my compass."

Lots of clues on the Stone Maps.......

When researching the Stone Maps, it certainly seems something worth considering.

Take care,

Joe
 

if you did not have me on ignore , i would be able to explain why that was a foolish thing to say joe .. your thinking but is that enough ... lol

you only see what you want to see joe .. thats why i like ya ... :headbang:
 

I have always.......always believed that the horse/priest map was created for confusion, at a much later date than the trail maps. For that reason I never paid that much attention to them. As you can see, the theories of any code contained on them can be constrained only by the imagination of the person trying to figure it all out.


Joe Ribaudo
[/quote]

Joe,
I am just quoting part of your post but if you believe that the Horse/Priest stone was created for confusion at a much later date then how did it end up with the other stones and all being found buried together in the desert?
Thanks,
Bill
 

Bill,

"I am just quoting part of your post but if you believe that the Horse/Priest stone was created for confusion at a much later date then how did it end up with the other stones and all being found buried together in the desert?"

It's pretty simple, really. I don't believe they were found at all. I believe they were created by Chuck Aylor and Ted DeGrazia, and maybe a little help from their friends.

When was the Horse/Priest stone first mentioned in public?

Take care,

Joe
 

Blindbowman said:
unless Chuck Aylor and Ted DeGrazia have a time mechine ,,, your thoery is wrong ...

i can out right prove the the set ( horse/priest , heart stone ,trail stone ) are one complete set and were made in 1646 ...fact !
Click to expand...

So - why don't you prove it to us rather than repeating ad nauseatum how you have solved it.
And your incessant repetition of the word 'facts' means zilch unless you can actually _prove_ it.
I just cannot understand that someone of your (superior) intelligence cannot see that what we want are _facts_ - not statements.

Anyone in the whole world can say: "I found it, I have proved it - now prove me wrong" - yeah right!!

Per
 

Per,

We have been trying to get bb to change his petulant ways for a number of years now. It ain't going to happen! Each time we call him on his blather, we just get more of the same.

I will be sending you something else soon. Received your note today.

Many thanks,

Joe
 

cactusjumper said:
Per,

We have been trying to get bb to change his petulant ways for a number of years now. It ain't going to happen! Each time we call him on his blather, we just get more of the same.

I will be sending you something else soon. Received your note today.

Many thanks,

Joe
Click to expand...
*chuckles* It's much like swimming against a strong current - isn't it? Doesn't matter what you do - the current never changes ...

And - you are more than welcome, _I_ should be the one to say 'thanks'.

Per
 

Loke said:
Blindbowman said:
unless Chuck Aylor and Ted DeGrazia have a time mechine ,,, your thoery is wrong ...

i can out right prove the the set ( horse/priest , heart stone ,trail stone ) are one complete set and were made in 1646 ...fact !
Click to expand...

So - why don't you prove it to us rather than repeating ad nauseatum how you have solved it.
And your incessant repetition of the word 'facts' means zilch unless you can actually _prove_ it.
I just cannot understand that someone of your (superior) intelligence cannot see that what we want are _facts_ - not statements.

Anyone in the whole world can say: "I found it, I have proved it - now prove me wrong" - yeah right!!

Per
Click to expand...

Loke - I was in the process of quoting BB's response to your question when he apparently deleted it. I don't recall the specifics, but the gist of it was that the code, secrecy and treasure associated with the Stones is now tied directly to the vatican, the pope and the catholic faith.

Don't ask me :dontknow:, he's been moments away from providing his proof for 3-4 years or more now.
 

Hi Cubfan, yes i read it, personally i'm looking forwards to the photos of the Jesuit code book,

i want to see if he's finished coloring it in !!!!

John
 

Paul,

Over the years, bb has had moments of lucidity where he deleats some of his more inventive posts. Perhaps that's what happened to his Pope post. :dontknow: That must have been a doozy........ ::)

Take care,

Joe
 

cactusjumper said:
Paul,

Over the years, bb has had moments of lucidity where he deleats some of his more inventive posts. Perhaps that's what happened to his Pope post. :dontknow: That must have been a doozy........ ::)

Take care,

Joe
Click to expand...

not as big as " the Dagger points north "...lol
 

furness said:
Hi Cubfan, yes i read it, personally i'm looking forwards to the photos of the Jesuit code book,

i want to see if he's finished coloring it in !!!!

John
Click to expand...

Furness,

I have seen it, and what happened was there was some water damage on the cover and it erased a word. It actually is:

The Jesuit Area Code Book

It is a listing of all the Jesuit area codes and phone numbers.


HAHAHA Best-Mike
 

Darn you and your ultraviolet lamp,Mike.Ya got me again,cause I could have sworn that it said "The Jesuit Cook Book".
I been giving BB a bit of lattitude,seeing as how his spelling needs a bit of remedial work anyways.
The recipe's are nothing short of miraculous.Try the one on pg.1847....."Fish dinner for 5000"
You might run out of chips and tartar sauce,though.

Regards:SH.
 

somehiker said:
Darn you and your ultraviolet lamp,Mike.Ya got me again,cause I could have sworn that it said "The Jesuit Cook Book".
I been giving BB a bit of lattitude,seeing as how his spelling needs a bit of remedial work anyways.
The recipe's are nothing short of miraculous.Try the one on pg.1847....."Fish dinner for 5000"
You might run out of chips and tartar sauce,though.

Regards:SH.
Click to expand...

I don't know about page1847, but maybe if you peak at Isaiah 18:4-7? :wink:

Maybe verse 7 has something to do with the folks who are supposed to have been guarding that Jesuit Loot all these years? Just a thought.

Mike
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Some more info on the LDM

⬅️ Previous Thread

Another LDM Story

Next Thread ➡️

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
We Dig Metal Detectors

Latest Discussions

Back
Top