Somero
You wrote : " Waltz story is a mine or cache on a mountain and Doc's is a cache at the bottom of a canyon. "
You are correct , my friend . But why in separate canyons ? The most LDM clues say how the mine is in a north - south trending canyon and how this canyon is a tributary canyon . In the picture below you can see :
- how the canyon trending north to south .
- how the canyon is tributary .
- how the uncovered vein of gold is at the bottom of the canyon.
- the carved horse head .
In this tributary canyon and above the exposed golden vein , just choose the side where you believe how the rays of the setting sun could glitter upon the mine .
View attachment 900871
Like I stated before, you could make a case both are one and the same. However if you try to make this distinction you cannot mix clues together, they must be approached separately. If they are the same the evidence will show in the discovery of one or the other. For me the difference that jumps out is that one describes a scenario in the bottom of a canyon, and Waltz's "directions" imply somewhere higher up. If somebody found the mine/cache high in a canyon then found a cache hidden at the bottom then maybe you could surmise the 2 stories lead to the same location. So I'm sticking with different locations described in both accounts, that is if either one is accurate.
Not to bash your picture, so no disrespect is intended towards you, but I would consider that type of G.E. image more of a cut in the mountain rather than a canyon, due to the fact that it cuts the mountain top in two, runs down the mountain in several gullies and most likely empties into the wash at the base of the mountain which is then a canyon. That is the problem with G.E. you can't tell how steep that cut might actually be, or how tall the rock formations are on either side.