Raparee
Hero Member
That's why I added the "nothing" because that was referring to the foundations!
... How about FK's post no. 744 this thread, do you think that is a photo of nothing?
You are right. I apologize. Harris' writings are nonsense and the 'foundations', in the sense that they are being touted as being the foundations of a Templar castle, are, in fact, nothing. The foundations shown in the photo at post 744 are made up of small, roundish stones. Building a stone structure on such a foundation would be foolish. It would be like building on marbles or ball bearings --- not stable. You have claimed on another thread that the Templars were (amongst other things) master masons. Would a master mason build a stone structure on such a small, shoddy foundation? No. Would a 19th century farmer build a shed or lambing pen or blacksmith shop on such a foundation? Yes.
A foundation there (if it actually is a foundation) doesn't prove anything.
Based on a lot more than a pointed finger, but you choose to cherry pick my posts
Are you denying that a lot of your 'premise' hinges on a statue pointing at a letter R?