Regardless of your position on the theories regarding the New Ross property, the relatively recent history is intertwined with J. Hope's writings. I have read her work and find it interesting. I don't have a conclusion as to the validity of her theories, or anyone else's for that matter, but she addresses some of the issues you question and offers possible explanations and evidence.
Since these ideas are apparently lost on you I can only surmise that you have not read what she offered. Thus, your snarky comments only seem uninformed. For example, she describes how she believed the stones from the castle may have been dispersed and where some of them are today. Is she right? I don't know, but if you want to know what she proposed - read it.