Stone tablet at 90 feet

Not sure how they show that and it not be their dig marks but that is how the story goes
This has always been one of the more specious claims to me. How do you dig a hole and notice dig marks on the wall of the hole unless they are the ones you made? Did they excavate like a modern archaeologist, using picks and paint brushes? I would give this claim a 99% certainty that it is a late embellishment.
 

The story and or their proof at the time, whether it was a depression, block n tackle hanging from tree, maybe both, along with supposedly dig marks in the sides as they dug down. ( Not sure how they show that and it not be their dig marks but that is how the story goes ) must have been pretty compelling to get others to join in on it..
If the story was true it was probably just remnants of someone digging an outhouse hole.
 

If the story was true it was probably just remnants of someone digging an outhouse hole.
....or a sinkhole that sank again and again and again taking whatever was lying on top with it....?
 

This has always been one of the more specious claims to me. How do you dig a hole and notice dig marks on the wall of the hole unless they are the ones you made?

I visualize it as the difference between actual "digging" and lifting shovelfuls of soil from a pile on the ground that somebody else made by digging it out already. The pre-dug stuff will be more, eh ... fluffy. Descriptions of the native soils there as clay-like glacial till would somewhat match with an idea of being able to see certain evidence in a cross section.

I think a cool experiment for the show would be to recreate some of the original legends as an experiment, such as a hand dig from surface in a virgin spot (obviously not in the overworked "Money Pit Area"), and pod-augur samples from various types of dimensional lumber.

--GT
 

I agree on your experiment ideas for the show BUT, can you imagine the uproar on here when they are actually searching for stuff and lots of folks on here are giving the show heck about it, just think what all they'd be saying if they were digging a hole just to dig it and NOT looking for treasure...
 

I agree on your experiment ideas for the show BUT, can you imagine the uproar on here when they are actually searching for stuff and lots of folks on here are giving the show heck about it, just think what all they'd be saying if they were digging a hole just to dig it and NOT looking for treasure...
They haven’t been looking for treasure on the show since it started.
 

If the actors on the show were really looking for treasure the reoccurring script on the show would change.

Right now the show's writers are in a fire drill trying to find something to entice viewers to watch as all the previous scripts have been repeated too many times and viewers are leaving in droves.
 

If the actors on the show were really looking for treasure the reoccurring script on the show would change.

Right now the show's writers are in a fire drill trying to find something to entice viewers to watch as all the previous scripts have been repeated too many times and viewers are leaving in droves.

100% correct. If those guys really believed there was a treasure buried on OI, and they really wanted to go after it, they would be doing things quite differently than what they are doing. What they are doing is entertainment, strictly for selling 30 second ads. Nothing more.
 

100% correct. If those guys really believed there was a treasure buried on OI, and they really wanted to go after it, they would be doing things quite differently than what they are doing. What they are doing is entertainment, strictly for selling 30 second ads. Nothing more.
Agreed Carl and you too TT. There not serious and haven't been for a long time. It started when they began hunting for artifacts and connecting any to something buried of value. The artifacts have nothing to do with something of value buried if you truly believed there is. They just need to stick with the mission and quit trying to see who was there if they believe in the original mission. It's just about the money now and has been for many years.
 

100% correct. If those guys really believed there was a treasure buried on OI, and they really wanted to go after it, they would be doing things quite differently than what they are doing. What they are doing is entertainment, strictly for selling 30 second ads. Nothing more.

It boggles the mind that you think they would go to all that trouble, with that scale of investment in contracted services and heavy equipment, rearranging the landscape to the tune of thousands of cubic meters of earth moved, putting people's lives at real risk (e.g. the divers), all just to make it look authentic for an imaginary goal ... for the remaining profit from selling ads? There are millions of more efficient ways to turn a profit, Mr. Carl ... thousands of ways to better use that money even in just the reality TV genre. It requires too much suspension of disbelief to think that ANY network or creative/production team would greenlight diverting that much cash (reducing the profits) into what in your theory would amount to dressing the set. It's ludicrous.

Your signature snippet, Carl, which you probably mean as a dig at others, seems quite apt for your own rigid thinking here. I'm curious how many other conspiracy theories you believe in? But I shan't ask which ones, for that might take us into realms of the forbidden on these boards.

--GT
 

If the actors on the show were really looking for treasure the reoccurring script on the show would change.

Right now the show's writers are in a fire drill trying to find something to entice viewers to watch as all the previous scripts have been repeated too many times and viewers are leaving in droves.

Every show has its peak and eventually sees its viewership numbers fall to the point where the network will pull the plug. That's really not a comment on this show's merit. TCoOI has had a phenomenal run. Traditional network shows (before the reality era) would dream of getting to 100 episodes and moving into syndication. TCoOI is already well past twice that. I believe its peak viewership season was three to four years ago, based on the promotional language at the time ("number one ..." blah blah blah "on cable"). One wonders why eight or nine seasons was not too much for those audiences but twelve is? My personal favorite season was when they had heavy duty excavations going simultaneously on multiple fronts including the big coffer dam on Smith's Cove as they worked on the U-shaped structure. Those works were visible on Google Maps with the satellite overlay at the time!

As someone else pointed out, this series may still be in the top five at History, which will probably ensure its run for at least another couple of seasons. At some point the principal "cast" will start to age out of wanting to be involved (in the production, not the hunt), but who knows, maybe Alex Lagina and Peter Fornetti, et al. can carry the franchise another decade or two? I'll keep watching.

Oh and BTW, actors in scripted shows would be in SAG/AFTRA or its Canadian equivalent ACTRA. The Curse cast are not members, therefore not actors. QED.

--GT
 

Last edited:
Every show has its peak and eventually sees its viewership numbers fall to the point where the network will pull the plug. That's really not a comment on this show's merit. TCoOI has had a phenomenal run. Traditional network shows (before the reality era) would dream of getting to 100 episodes and moving into syndication. TCoOI is already well past twice that. I believe its peak viewership season was three to four years ago, based on the promotional language at the time ("number one ..." blah blah blah "on cable"). One wonders why eight or nine seasons was not too much for those audiences but twelve is? My personal favorite season was when they had heavy duty excavations going simultaneously on multiple fronts including the big coffer dam on Smith's Cove as they worked on the U-shaped structure. Those works were visible on Google Maps with the satellite overlay at the time!

As someone else pointed out, this series may still be in the top five at History, which will probably ensure its run for at least another couple of seasons. At some point the principal "cast" will start to age out of wanting to be involved (in the production, not the hunt), but who knows, maybe Alex Lagina and Peter Fornetti, et al. can carry the franchise another decade or two? I'll keep watching.

Oh and BTW, actors in scripted shows would be in SAG/AFTRA or its Canadian equivalent ACTRA. The Curse cast are not members, therefore not actors. QED.

--GT
Oh ye of little faith..................... :) :)
 

The artifacts have nothing to do with something of value buried if you truly believed there is. They just need to stick with the mission and quit trying to see who was there if they believe in the original mission.
?????
Seems like if you were trying to figure out what target you were trying to find, knowing who buried it there would be helpful.
 

?????
Seems like if you were trying to figure out what target you were trying to find, knowing who buried it there would be helpful.
What would change if the Knights Templar or a pirate buried something of value 100+ ft. deep...?
 

Not the only possibilities

Is it bigger than a breadbox? The larger a precious metal target is, the farther away you can be and detect it electronically.

Is it jewels or paper goods? Good luck detecting that.

Is it something else? My favorite idea is a British arms cache done in the withdrawal of 1782. Might be a cannon there.

I guess AFTER you find it, you can figure out who.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom