Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No...not "PROOF".
PROOF cannot contain any ambiguity; in order to be considered PROOF, it MUST be DEFINITE. It cannot utilize the phrases "could have", "possibly", "likely", or even "probably".
The fact that POSSIBLE coconut coir was carbon-dated to approximately 600 years ago is only EVIDENCE, not PROOF. It hasn't even been PROVEN to be coconut coir.
Something to help people get through the last few episodes for the season....
View attachment 1823181
Guaranteed to leave you smashed every episode....
No, its proof! The "coir" was positively identified by one of the best known botanist's in the world, Canadian James H. Soper in three of the four samples sent him from the museum. The several datings were done by two different labs with complete analysis also supplied, with both labs well respected and well qualified the dating has never wavered from the late 1100's to the 14th century. Nowhere does any of the above test use the words "could have", "possibly", "likely", or even "probably". Since Mr. Soper's id, there have been at least two other positive id's of the material. Those id's that were inconclusive may not have been coconut fibre at all, as in the one case of Mr. Soper's one test of his four samples. That btw, is the only "may" in this discussion.
Sorry gazzahk, I'm trying to get this to my own thread!
Cheers, Loki
My comment you quoted concerns PROVING that the Templars, and ONLY the Templars were responsible for the coconut fibre being on Oak Island. You repeatedly state that the Templars "had access" to Mediterranean coir, and therefore "could" have used it for rigging...but no proof that they actually DID use it, let alone brought it to North America. IF they used it at all, it would have been as a substandard "stop-gap" or "make-do" measure until such time as it was possible to obtain proper hemp rope...such as when they returned to La Rochelle. ANY planned extended voyage/escape from there would have required a thorough preparation and re-fit of the vessels, and replacing any such jury-rigged or ad hoc materials. BTW - Did any of the coconut fibres from Oak Island contain traces of tar? About half the rigging on a sailing vessel (standing rigging) was tarred to prevent rot. Fibre used as caulking (oakum) would also be tarred.No, its proof! The "coir" was positively identified by one of the best known botanist's in the world, Canadian James H. Soper in three of the four samples sent him from the museum. The several datings were done by two different labs with complete analysis also supplied, with both labs well respected and well qualified the dating has never wavered from the late 1100's to the 14th century. Nowhere does any of the above test use the words "could have", "possibly", "likely", or even "probably". Since Mr. Soper's id, there have been at least two other positive id's of the material. Those id's that were inconclusive may not have been coconut fibre at all, as in the one case of Mr. Soper's one test of his four samples. That btw, is the only "may" in this discussion.
Sorry gazzahk, I'm trying to get this to my own thread!
Cheers, Loki
My comment you quoted concerns PROVING that the Templars, and ONLY the Templars were responsible for the coconut fibre being on Oak Island. You repeatedly state that the Templars "had access" to Mediterranean coir, and therefore "could" have used it for rigging...but no proof that they actually DID use it, let alone brought it to North America. IF they used it at all, it would have been as a substandard "stop-gap" or "make-do" measure until such time as it was possible to obtain proper hemp rope...such as when they returned to La Rochelle. ANY planned extended voyage/escape from there would have required a thorough preparation and re-fit of the vessels, and replacing any such jury-rigged or ad hoc materials. BTW - Did any of the coconut fibres from Oak Island contain traces of tar? About half the rigging on a sailing vessel (standing rigging) was tarred to prevent rot. Fibre used as caulking (oakum) would also be tarred.
James H Soper, known for his 1964 article "Mapping the Distribution of Plants by Machine" on the Canadian Journal of Botany "positively identified" three of four samples sent to him from what museum and when?... The "coir" was positively identified by one of the best known botanist's in the world, Canadian James H. Soper in three of the four samples sent him from the museum.
The several datings were done by two different labs with complete analysis also supplied, with both labs well respected and well qualified the dating has never wavered from the late 1100's to the 14th century...
Another hayride to the strawman red herring fish fry....
If the Lost Tribes of Israel did travel to North America wouldn't they have built vessels using local materials?
In addition to being an order of warrior monks, bankers, and traders, the Templars were also arborists?
So the real purpose of this undocumented alleged Templar voyage to Oak Island was NOT to bury treasure, but to plant cork oak trees from Portugal.
Now that's a good one!
And they weren't jury rigged, "coir" made a very usable rope and many of the other items hemp would have been used for in Europe. "Coir" also had a major advantage, it would far outlast hemp in rot resistance.
Cheers, Loki
That's just it it's NOT WELL ACCEPTED on here atleast. Some don't believe in the coconut fibers as being coconut fiber which is why they had them tested. Same as that leaf and acorns. If they get it tested it takes the dispute out of it.. Neither helps find any treasure of course..
For those who keep saying it is well documented of activity on the island years before the Money Pit was supposedly found, like fishing camps, boat repair shop, salt mining factory, etc etc. Can you name any of them or any other business that MIGHT have been there around that time or before that would have needed to dig a hole over 100' deep?
To tell the truth, I cannot recall if it was you or franklin that stated that the Templars would have used rigging made of coconut fibre "until such time as proper hemp or sisal rope could be obtained' which implied that such coconut fibre rope was sub-standard.
...and what purpose may that be, Loki, my friend?Wow, your purpose here is becoming clear now!
That's just it it's NOT WELL ACCEPTED on here atleast. Some don't believe in the coconut fibers as being coconut fiber which is why they had them tested. Same as that leaf and acorns. If they get it tested it takes the dispute out of it.. Neither helps find any treasure of course..
For those who keep saying it is well documented of activity on the island years before the Money Pit was supposedly found, like fishing camps, boat repair shop, salt mining factory, etc etc. Can you name any of them or any other business that MIGHT have been there around that time or before that would have needed to dig a hole over 100' deep?
The first major group of settlers arrived in the Chester area from Massachusetts in 1761, and Oak Island was officially surveyed and divided into 32 four-acre lots in the following year.