Re: Opinions on this KGC "Vault"
Dear group;
Our ever-inquistive friend, Goody-Guy has brought a very good example of why, as dedicated researchers, we should always be extremely cautious in regards to all OOPArts (Out-Of-Place-Artifacts). He wrote:
I just thought I would add this, even though it is a might off topic. This happened a mile from where I grew up and while I was in the 8th grade.
In 1963, a construction engineer found a small hoard of Roman coins while excavating the north bank of the Ohio River during construction of the Sherman Minton Bridge for Interstate Highway 64 at the Falls of the Ohio, from New Albany, Ind., to Louisville, Ky. The coins were grouped as though they had originally been in a leather pouch that had long since disintegrated.
The discoverer kept most of the hoard for himself, but gave two of the coins to another engineer on the project. In 1997, the second engineer's widow brought these two to Troy McCormick, then manager of the new Falls of the Ohio Museum in Clarksville, Ind., not far from the find site. She donated them to the museum, where they remain today.
http://www.econ.ohio-state.edu/jhm/arch/coins/fallsoh.htm
Here is a story about some Roman coins found in a cave in Kentucky. http://www.econ.ohio-state.edu/jhm/arch/coins/breathit.htm
Fragments of ancient Roman armor including helmets and swords have also been found in the general area along the Ohio River between Indiana, Ohio and Kentucky.
Neither of these reports are attributed to Henson.
Although as has been stated no one knows who lost them or when.
GG~
First, the finder, if he did in fact find the coins, should have STOPPED IMMEDIATELY after he had located the first coin and contacted not an archeaologist, but an entire team of them. In all reality, what the finder did was to destroy any and all possible credibility. The depth and location of the coin cache is vitally important in determining how the grounds arrived at the spot they were located at and the time frame in which they arrived there. So, what does the finder do? He grabs everything he can and POOF! All realible evidence was vaporized in that moment.
Next, we must examine the age of the two respecive coins. One was minted in 312AD and the other in 268AD, perhaps even longer. The closest the can be in age to one another is 44 years and this is a rather long time span. If we were to scrutinize the older of the two coins closely, we might find that is in the same condition as the coin which is 44 years newer. It would make sense that if the older coin were in continous circulation throughout the Roman Empire for a minimum of 44 years, it would show more pronounced wear markings.
Because the coins were located where a major road was located seems to state that the coins were found in an area where there is a lot of modern road traffic. In fact, many theories exist as to how the coin cache ended where it did. First, it could have been part of a hoax. Next, the cache may have been stolen from a private collector and was buried by the thief, or the thief may have dropped it inadvertantly. Or, it may have legitmately lost by the lawful owner. He may have been moving and the cache somehow managed to end up on the side of the road, or one of his children may have tossed the bag out of the moving auto, and on and on, ad infinium.
I also find it very odd that at no time has a member of an archeaological research team ever dug up any item such as this, or have ever been contacted to conduct a scientific investigation while the OOPArt was still in-situ, that is to state, still in the ground. It's always after the fact, and generally WELL after the fact that these OOPArts seem to surface and by then, any reputable confirmation has long since disappeared.
Your friend;
LAMAR