One Dowsed observation

[Limitool]

Why do I need to prove my Dowsing content?
What is the substance of your argument, it's empty, no fact to prove your argument..

I'm not trying to argue a fact or to prove anything. YOU STATED that you wanted to prove dowsing sir. You don't have to prove anything to anyone unless you want. So... "Why do I need to prove my Dowsing content?" you ask..... YOU DON"T. If a treasure was found using dowsing why would you call it controversial...? Wouldn't you believe it? Why all the worry over non-believers...?

I never brought up the idea of fame from dowsing.... YOU DID... twice..! I only inquired on why you associate dowsing with fame. Your 2 statements made no sense to me as mine didn't you inquiring about your said statements. If you think dowsing will bring fame then so-be-it. If it's unwanted then QUIT.

But you constantly feed into the skepticism by being negative to your own endeavor. If negative comments alters your goals I wish you'd take a stronger stance and stick with it (dowsing health). Please ignore people who don't believe in your endeavor as they have no input into it unless you allow it. Everything I asked and inquired about came from statements you posted. I don't make them up. Stay focused.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Cry Of The Eagle: History And Legends Of The Cherokee Indians And Their Buried Treasure - Grab it through Amazon!

[dowser]

It seems to me that this is the whole problem with your argument.


What have you proven? I haven't seen any proof of anything, just claim after claim with unjustified conclusions. You claim to have healed people with frequencies, but there is no proof. You claim to have dowsed gold and silver, but there is no proof. You claim to have dowsed a photon, but there is no proof (photons, by the way, move at 186,000 miles per second -- talk about a moving target). You claim all kinds of things, but then you have a dozen reasons why none of them are verifiable.

Maybe it would help to clarify "proof". To me, proof means that you can reliably and accurately get a result that could not be simple chance, and which could be independently verified. Ideally, the same method should be employable by a third party to produce an identical result. That's scientific proof. (And don't try to deflect and say this isn't science, because it is. You're talking about frequencies and quantum mechanics and photons and EMF and similar issues, all of which are well studied. If you want to say it's all psychic or astral or something along that line, then that's fine, but then you don't need all these "sciencey" bits to dress it up.)

THe proof is in the Category called Dowsing on Treasure net forum. Even if the moderators don't believe, they consider it content with substance.
Allowing me as an individual to post my dowsing experiences and results. There is no rules on proof, therefore my content is allowed.
Please take it up with T-net on what I am allowed to post. I will comply!
Its allowed to you to add content with substance. Arguments on what I post are empty..
Just snapping my suspenders and watching my rods spin, needed more attention. I don't know words to explain what you don't know!

 

[dowser]

I'm not trying to argue a fact or to prove anything. YOU STATED that you wanted to prove dowsing sir. You don't have to prove anything to anyone unless you want. So... "Why do I need to prove my Dowsing content?" you ask..... YOU DON"T. If a treasure was found using dowsing why would you call it controversial...? Wouldn't you believe it? Why all the worry over non-believers...?

I never brought up the idea of fame from dowsing.... YOU DID... twice..! I only inquired on why you associate dowsing with fame. Your 2 statements made no sense to me as mine didn't you inquiring about your said statements. If you think dowsing will bring fame then so-be-it. If it's unwanted then QUIT.

But you constantly feed into the skepticism by being negative to your own endeavor. If negative comments alters your goals I wish you'd take a stronger stance and stick with it (dowsing health). Please ignore people who don't believe in your endeavor as they have no input into it unless you allow it. Everything I asked and inquired about came from statements you posted. I don't make them up. Stay focused.

All I know about skepticism is you guys. I've never experienced it myself. I guess I'm flawed..
I just don't care what you believe.
Truthfully, there is no way a picture of a ring or coins laying next to Dowsing rods is proof. Not at all. But that's what you want me to post. A picture that you can dismiss anyways. You can say the Gold coins are chocolate if you want.
When I say proof I mean proof.
A Treasure Dowsing find that can't be written of as, just by chance.. I know of one, but haven't gotten there yet.
If you read my past posts you would know the reason for the delay..
I will most likely be the one to find the treasure and attract unwanted attention.
I have posted the words unwanted attention, and got argument over my thoughts.
I don't want any fame, but my destiny is heading towards that direction.

 

[robertk]

THe proof is in the Category called Dowsing on Treasure net forum. Even if the moderators don't believe, they consider it content with substance.
Allowing me as an individual to post my dowsing experiences and results. There is no rules on proof, therefore my content is allowed.

You can't possibly be serious. Just because an Internet forum -- even a place like TreasureNet -- allows posts about a particular subject does not in any way lend credence to the veracity of those posts. Just because they have a dowsing forum does not mean everything posted in it is "proof" of anything.

There is no rules on proof, therefore my content is allowed.

Your content is allowed because it's dowsing related. That doesn't make it proof of anything. You could say you dowsed the Loch Ness Monster and the post would be allowed. Whether or not it happened would be irrelevant to the post being allowed.

Please take it up with T-net on what I am allowed to post.

The rules are already clearly posted. But to save you the trouble, here are screenshots, from the forum page, and from the "Read Me First" post in the forum itself. Note that there is nothing saying you have to prove anything to be able to post.

 

[dowser]

You can't possibly be serious. Just because an Internet forum -- even a place like TreasureNet -- allows posts about a particular subject does not in any way lend credence to the veracity of those posts. Just because they have a dowsing forum does not mean everything posted in it is "proof" of anything.


Your content is allowed because it's dowsing related. That doesn't make it proof of anything. You could say you dowsed the Loch Ness Monster and the post would be allowed. Whether or not it happened would be irrelevant to the post being allowed.


The rules are already clearly posted. But to save you the trouble, here are screenshots, from the forum page, and from the "Read Me First" post in the forum itself. Note that there is nothing saying you have to prove anything to be able to post.

View attachment 2201172

View attachment 2201173

Okay, now I forgot what your arguing about..
Ask again

 

[robertk]

Okay, now I forgot what your arguing about..
Ask again

Nah, I think I'm done. It's starting to smell like Trolls.

 

[Limitool]

All I know about skepticism is you guys. I've never experienced it myself. I guess I'm flawed..
I just don't care what you believe.
Truthfully, there is no way a picture of a ring or coins laying next to Dowsing rods is proof. Not at all. But that's what you want me to post. A picture that you can dismiss anyways. You can say the Gold coins are chocolate if you want.
When I say proof I mean proof.
A Treasure Dowsing find that can't be written of as, just by chance.. I know of one, but haven't gotten there yet.
If you read my past posts you would know the reason for the delay..
I will most likely be the one to find the treasure and attract unwanted attention.
I have posted the words unwanted attention, and got argument over my thoughts.
I don't want any fame, but my destiny is heading towards that direction.

You say things that have absolutely no merit what so ever. And you assume an awful lot also. I've stated several time that you feed into your own skepticism over and over and wonder what's "wrong". And don't tell any of us... "I just don't care what you believe."...! That's bullshit.

ALL YOU EVER post about outside of your dowsing observations is about skeptical folks, fame, non-believers or calling dowsing a controversial method if something of value was found. You feed it. So if you perfected dowsing to find coins, rings or metal your already writing off your finds and methodology yourself.

You want to be believed or you don't care... which is it? You want attention or you don't.... which is it? You don't want fame or you do.... which is it?

Quit worrying about what you think we want and prove your dowsing to yourself then share with us. This is YOUR project and if you believe in it then stay positive and advance it. Quit being self destructive, feeding into the skepticism and telling us you don't care.

 

[Limitool]

THe proof is in the Category called Dowsing on Treasure net forum. Even if the moderators don't believe, they consider it content with substance.
Allowing me as an individual to post my dowsing experiences and results. There is no rules on proof, therefore my content is allowed.
Please take it up with T-net on what I am allowed to post. I will comply!
Its allowed to you to add content with substance. Arguments on what I post are empty..
Just snapping my suspenders and watching my rods spin, needed more attention. I don't know words to explain what you don't know!

What does Tnet having a forum concerning dowsing have to do with your thread...?

 

[signal_line]

signal_line, map dowsing can be not mental you are testing the wrong methods, on a table put two equal coins separated by a distance of 7cm then pass the pendulum in the middle or between the 2 coins, you will hit a blockage its an imaginary line that exists between the 2 coins because they are made of same material. This method can be used in map dowsing, so, you put the witness(coin) over the printed picture then search around the witness the imaginary line
..voila you have accurate map dowsing

Now, what you hit with this line? an object, mineral, ring or treasure?
..that is treasure hunting in maps with dowsing
..you hit something then you have to find the way to determine what are you hitting
This type of dowsing (physical) its limited to 25 meters of deep

Very interesting. Quite similar to using a frequency generator for map dowsing. I’ll give it a try using an L-rod.

 

[dowser]

What does Tnet having a forum concerning dowsing have to do with your thread...?

They allow it

 

[dowser]

You say things that have absolutely no merit what so ever. And you assume an awful lot also. I've stated several time that you feed into your own skepticism over and over and wonder what's "wrong". And don't tell any of us... "I just don't care what you believe."...! That's bullshit.

ALL YOU EVER post about outside of your dowsing observations is about skeptical folks, fame, non-believers or calling dowsing a controversial method if something of value was found. You feed it. So if you perfected dowsing to find coins, rings or metal your already writing off your finds and methodology yourself.

You want to be believed or you don't care... which is it? You want attention or you don't.... which is it? You don't want fame or you do.... which is it?

Quit worrying about what you think we want and prove your dowsing to yourself then share with us. This is YOUR project and if you believe in it then stay positive and advance it. Quit being self destructive, feeding into the skepticism and telling us you don't care.

Still not a content question, try again..

 

[dowser]

Very interesting. Quite similar to using a frequency generator for map dowsing. I’ll give it a try using an L-rod.

In a past post you mentioned using Uranium to excite the sample.. Yes, it sure does most Elements. I place the Uranium directly behind the sample, towards the direction of the target..

 

[dowser]

I'd love to Dowse a Giant Pearl, but they aren't around here..
The size of that thing must signal a couple miles..

 

[signal_line]

In a past post you mentioned using Uranium to excite the sample.. Yes, it sure does most Elements. I place the Uranium directly behind the sample, towards the direction of the target..

I’ve never experimented with uranium as an amplifier. I’ve used tritium ampule that is in some of those glow key chains they used to sell on eBay, may still be there. I removed the outer shell but be careful not to break the tube. If you do, don’t breathe! And get away. It is lighter than air and will float off, but probably cause lung cancer if you do breathe it.

Magnets are plenty good amplifier. Most people don’t realize a weak magnet works better. You can make your own just strong enough to pull a compass needle part way. I use copper coated steel welding rod one to three inches long and place one pole of a magnet at the center point and draw it out to the end of the rod. Only draw the magnet in one direction. Repeat a few times and it will stay magnetized for a long time. Make two magnets and sandwich the sample in between them. The trick with magnets is how high above the ground you place it—higher gives more distance. I think nine feet above the ground gives thirty miles range. Two feet high about a hundred yards. But I might be a little bit off. You need to do your own testing. You might even try tilting it to match your compass incline for your latitude. “Incline” probably is the wrong term.

I don’t recommend the tritium ampules but you can do a eBay search: “25 year light tube 3h”. About $16

 

[dowser]

The thing is, Nobody is getting rid of their phones, so this will continue regardless of what we believe..

Its easily changed.
It would be done in an app, before the phone is bought..

 

[dowser]

I’ve never experimented with uranium as an amplifier. I’ve used tritium ampule that is in some of those glow key chains they used to sell on eBay, may still be there. I removed the outer shell but be careful not to break the tube. If you do, don’t breathe! And get away. It is lighter than air and will float off, but probably cause lung cancer if you do breathe it.

Magnets are plenty good amplifier. Most people don’t realize a weak magnet works better. You can make your own just strong enough to pull a compass needle part way. I use copper coated steel welding rod one to three inches long and place one pole of a magnet at the center point and draw it out to the end of the rod. Only draw the magnet in one direction. Repeat a few times and it will stay magnetized for a long time. Make two magnets and sandwich the sample in between them. The trick with magnets is how high above the ground you place it—higher gives more distance. I think nine feet above the ground gives thirty miles range. Two feet high about a hundred yards. But I might be a little bit off. You need to do your own testing. You might even try tilting it to match your compass incline for your latitude. “Incline” probably is the wrong term.

I don’t recommend the tritium ampules but you can do a eBay search: “25 year light tube 3h”. About $16

It works great on distant Meteorites, some have oxygen some not.

 

[TORRERO]

Its easily changed.
It would be done in an app, before the phone is bought..

I'm not understanding, ? Do you want me to buy an app that changes the phone frequency for every persons phone on the planet ?

 

[dowser]

I'm not understanding, ? Do you want me to buy an app that changes the phone frequency for every persons phone on the planet ?

What app?

 

[dowser]

I posted many times in the past stating, Dowsing Power isn't constant! But it is..
Its a continuous repetitive series of Frequencies, fluctuating in wavelength and amplitude, constantly being bombarded with disruptive energy's..
It's consistently a mess!

 

[Limitool]

THe proof is in the Category called Dowsing on Treasure net forum. Even if the moderators don't believe, they consider it content with substance.
Allowing me as an individual to post my dowsing experiences and results. There is no rules on proof, therefore my content is allowed.
Please take it up with T-net on what I am allowed to post. I will comply!
Its allowed to you to add content with substance. Arguments on what I post are empty..
Just snapping my suspenders and watching my rods spin, needed more attention. I don't know words to explain what you don't know!

What does Tnet having a forum concerning dowsing have to do with your thread...?

They allow it

"They allow it"... Duh, that's why they have it. Why wouldn't they allow it...? Anybody can post on it.

Who told you that information above in red...? They actually told you your content has substance...? I'd totally bet that they told you NOTHING. Nor would I expect them too. Your assuming again and grandstanding on your own behalf. I agree with robertk's above postings.

Your content isn't allowed because there's no rules on proof...! That's just common sense guy. Nobody told you that either. You could write a fairy tale about dowsing, post it and they wouldn't care. Do you realize that? Why would anybody take up anything with Tnet concerning your posts...? Nobody cares what Tnet thinks about your posts.

"Arguments on what I post are empty..".... That's true... you live in denial and are above being questioned and beyond explanation of your comments when asked. Especially non-dowsing content comments by you.

"I don't know words to explain what you don't know!"... IT'S YOUR THREAD AND YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW THE WORDS TO EXPLAIN YOURSELF WHEN ASKED. This thread is about what you post not us.
What your doing here comes across as self-serving and reveals a lot about yourself. You are not a victim dowser so quit acting like it. You constantly play into it despite being encouraged and your dowsing claims. For someone who "claims" to not care what others believe or think you sure comment and play into the skepticism.