b3y0nd3r
Hero Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 982
- Reaction score
- 1,173
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Detector(s) used
- ctx 3030 nokta impact Equinox 800
Re-read the quotation. Carefully. What evidence is being presented that rules out natural, and who is presenting it?
Triton's carbon dated man made metal from deep underground. Independent BOTANISTS AND THE Smithsonian. All you have to do is look iook it up.
"This level of cognitive bias is impressive, even by the standards of this forum."
Cognitive bias? Providing an exact quote is bias? If I said that president Bush said "mission accomplished" would that mean I am for or against him and his views?
Learn to differentiate between Providing a quote and taking a side.
As for this:
"But O’Connor believes that the pit must have been dug by the Spanish, whose galleons, loaded with New World plunder, passed within 400 miles of Nova Scotia in the 16th century. He speculates that a disabled ship stashed its loot, planning to return, but sank before it could carry news of the trove back to Spain. “The chances are better than even,” he says, “that the treasure is still there"
I didn't see him say this. If it was quoted out of a book or interview, it must of been later on. However I was speaking about the quote I mentioned.
I suppose because I believe that someone buried something and it isn't natural, I have an agenda to sell books or get you to invest in the money pit? OR It could be that i'm just providing factually said quotes.