That’s been nice, Mariner. Excuse for this post because I’m sure it talks about subjects you all already talk about lot of times before but I have this doubts in my head and no better place to talk about it like this forum. So, excuse me but here I go. Talking about the Black Swann case. There is something that I think is the axe on this issue. How do we consider the treasure? as a big amount of money or a unique cultural heritage? Could be both at the same time? It’s possible to deal commercial interest and scientifical research? Can every side of this issue make a living of recovering and/or researching underwater cultural heritage? I don’t know. I’ve a mediterranean education and I don’t feel comfortable seeing greed commercial recovery companies looting around. But I do believe that is possible that Odyssey could be the beginning of ethical commercial recovery. And this could be an interesting start and we are loosing this opportunity in a complicated trial that only will give the "money" to one or to another. I don’t know if I’m been able of explaining my self. Sorry.