There are 13 megalithic stones that have layers of data. The cross 867X720. The stone triangle is a 3 sided pyramid with 720 internal and first external is 147+720=867. The cipher is left in the stones of Taurus, Cross, Pyramid, Hyades, December triangle, eye in the swamp. Its a cipher of a nautical nature.
The people involved in the search are amateurs and have no idea what they are doing. The clues are written in stone and the message is redundant. Us subtraction on the Cross and addition on the Pyramid. Then apply the results to the chart of Taurus. Treasure at 233' off the south shore of the old smith's cove.
It's a story detail, yes. Why would anyone who wants to feed you a story dress it up with so many nice round numbers? Are we to believe that the platforms were not potentially only approximately 10 feet apart? Probably not. The numbers as given matter enough to keep repeating them. It is why we have things which no one can even show that do have surviving descriptions and that still offer the opportunity to "puzzle" about them. The goal was likely that enough would survive to forever draw interest. What can we infer of a circular hole on a surface that is characterized with 9 levels of depth. Why place a symbolic polished rectangular stone of dimension 5x8 at that level? There are unrelated stories that might suggest you do that. Shouldn't that make us suspicious of a borrowing of detail?
There are no original three boys making a discovery at OI. No depression was found on Casper Wollenhaupt's old land in 1795 by a young John Smith who bought that already well used land in that year. The story detail of the depression under the tree is taken directly from the account of the events at Hobson's Nose, NS, South of OI in Mahone Bay, which dates to ca. 1830. Prior to 1830 that are not known OI treasure legends. What we repeat from the alleged treasure seeker efforts dates to the 1840s. The backdating of events to earlier dates only happened in the late 1850s after John Smith died. Those were given by Vaughn who is not a reputable individual to begin with. The reason they first appear in the newspapers in Halifax in the early 1860s is because that's about when they came to light to be reported on.
Of borrowing it you mean. I don't think there' s any evidence that intelligent men created a new kind of narrative at OI. It already existed in the Western esoteric tradition to be exploited. But to transfer it to Mahone Bay kinda forces you to have your demo be in the place it is given to us at. The question of who even appreciated this is answered by the obvious answer: it was those Holy Royal Arch Freemason of the 40th regiment of foot who formed the first Masonic lodge in NS in 1742. That Charles Morris planned and surveyed OI is the tangible link to it that is required to explain why a symbolic geometric story is located at Shoreham dating to 1762. The story has never ceased to be in the hands of Freemasons at OI for them to keep the necessary details together since then. Much credit goes to Reginald Harris for being the custodian of the "mystery" for so long. Before him it had been the Archibald's of Truro who had done the work to popularize the story far and wide.
Its on someone else's property in another country. Your statement indicates you didn't read the post for comprehension. Admittedly its a complex cipher as they pieced it together frugally.
Are you asking someone to "disprove" something you don't even know is true...? What kind of logic is that...?
Oh darn it, wouldn't you know it.
Cipher? Oh boy. That's how treasures are buried that evaporate. Ciphers.
I have put forth a mathematically redundant proof. You cannot disprove it with facts such as math. Its medieval so a lot is going to be 'mystical' or have to do with lore.
Yes, true. However, the blind searchers might have their eyes opened and their hands directed if its talked up. Those guys get dozens of theories daily.
Math? Oh boy.
There are no Templar Freemasons. There are only Freemasons who have Knights Templar degrees. It's part of the role playing charade they like to maintain.
If you had put in the effort that this response took on reading the mathematically redundant you might have seen it.
I am not a know it all. Noahs Ark was a different Ark and isnt spoken of in the cipher.
I never asked you for a damn thing except answering a question. You want someone to disprove something you don't even know is true I asked. I think the whole thing is nothing but a great tale embellished by a few who play into it. YOU ASK THE OWNERS...! YOU GET PERMISSION...! YOU GO TO THEM AND PUT AN X OUT FOR THEM TO DIG...! Hell send them a letter.
By accident you are correct. There are 6 visible stones of Taurus. The 7th - ALDEBARAN is in the swamp. Its the start point. There is a plot on the cross it gets transferred to that point and it reveals the location of "X" about 145' away
It's good thing that you cannot dig, because it would eventually force you to alter your star chart theories ad infinitum. Many have tried what you play with to try and unravel the alchemical hocus pocus based in Chaldean numerology. They are always forced to be creative to try and rescue their beliefs. The stories are allegorical if they are anything. They get adorned with things that look to us like provable math statements in the hope that transfer occurs, and that we start thinking that one thing confirms the other. To succeed is to walk away from the shovel and to embrace a literary approach.
