Oak Island Factual (proven/documented) Information

Status
Not open for further replies.
I took some of Petter Amundsen's theories, some of Marie Bauer Hall and others and I have solved the Beale Treasure, Oak Island Treasure mystery and the Bruton Parish Treasure all three at the same time. And now where these treasures are located you can forget about ever making a recovery.

Naw Bud, I really have solved the Oak Island Mystery, The Bruton Parish Mystery and possibly the Beale Treasure Mystery at the same time. Take Oak Island as one of the four "Holy Grails" where are the other three? How about Williamsburg, Va., Philadelphia, Pa., and Washington, D.C. It is all sitting in Washington D.C. not to far from what everyone calls the "White House" and that is "Satan's Seat"
 

I would never call you a liar, Loki. I am sure that you firmly believe that this site in the Basin is the remains of a Templar settlement. But because you believe that it is so, doesn't make it so ... unless you have had a licensed archaeologist excavate the site, and has found actual artifacts, in context, that can only be attributed to the Templars ... Have you undertaken an excavation of the area?

Thanks for that (I guess). I have talked to a couple of archaeologists, but a couple of things have to fall into place first which is why I'm intent on keeping this alive on the Oak Island Treasure Net site. Not a settlement btw, more of a burial plot!

Cheers, Loki
 

Last edited:
Naw Bud, I really have solved the Oak Island Mystery, The Bruton Parish Mystery and possibly the Beale Treasure Mystery at the same time. Take Oak Island as one of the four "Holy Grails" where are the other three? How about Williamsburg, Va., Philadelphia, Pa., and Washington, D.C. It is all sitting in Washington D.C. not to far from what everyone calls the "White House" and that is "Satan's Seat"

Knew it had to reach this point sooner or later........
 

144 posts......still no factual evidence that anything of significance ever existed on oak island...
 

I took some of Petter Amundsen's theories, some of Marie Bauer Hall and others and I have solved the Beale Treasure, Oak Island Treasure mystery and the Bruton Parish Treasure all three at the same time. And now where these treasures are located you can forget about ever making a recovery.

When you have an unverifiable fact, you don't actually have a fact.

I know where the Ark of the Convenant is, but it's buried under the sail of the USS Parche in downtown Bremerton. There's no way that I can excavate it. But there it is. I'm sure of it.

800px-Sail_of_the_USS_Parche_(SSN-683)_(6773736936)_(2).jpg

Right under there. I'm absolutely sure of it.
 

My wife's cousins were pro wrestlers back in the 80's, they worked very hard to make things as believable as possible. Often they had to "wrestle" the same guys every night for a month in different towns. You couldn't actually hurt your opponent, it was their job (and yours ) to make the audience believe you were killing him brutally . If you did it correctly, and performed well, everybody made good money night after night .

I don't mean to crap on professional wrestling. While the outcomes are decided ahead of time, there is a lot of athleticism involved leading up to that, never mind the showmanship from the athletes cutting promos. If that was an easy job, everyone would do it, but few do. I merely used it as an example of how America's viewing patterns are not necessarily centered on nonfiction, even when the product is sold as such.

Professional wrestling is actually something of an art if you ask me. I say this as someone that does not watch professional wrestling, but I appreciate art. I have nothing but respect for the folks that do it for a living. It's (kind of) fake, but we're expected to know that it is. I crap on reality television because it's represented as something that is real, which it's normally not, and we're not expected to know that it's not.
 

When you have an unverifiable fact, you don't actually have a fact.

I know where the Ark of the Convenant is, but it's buried under the sail of the USS Parche in downtown Bremerton. There's no way that I can excavate it. But there it is. I'm sure of it.


Right under there. I'm absolutely sure of it.

If you know its there it is a fact to you is it not?

Cheers, Loki
 

Last edited:
151 posts and still no factual evidence....
 

C'mon now Mr. Wonder, you can't count any of your posts in that total as you certainly are not looking for any factual evidence!

Cheers, Loki
Loki
I think we all here in this thread want real facts about Oak Island...but none are showing up !
That`s a fact.
 

you can argue this point till the cows come home . IT MEANS NOTHING ..people are going to do what they want and could care less what people think I will go try and find a barber dime and when i do i will have found more than all the OAK ISLAND and BEALE chasers ......ever will
 

From Collins Advanced English Dictionary; "If you say that you know something 'for a fact', you are emphasizing that you are completely certain that it is true"

Cheers, Loki

Many, many moons ago my wife was pregnant with our second child. Her grandmother was convinced that the child was a boy. "You can tell it's a boy by how she's carrying him", she said. Silly folk wisdom. When we went for a regular ultrasound, though, the tech told us, too, that the child was a boy. We were completely certain, based on the information that we had, that our child would be a boy. In fact, the child was born a beautiful, healthy girl. Being convinced and certain that the child was a boy didn't make it so. The truth was ... the fact was... that the child was always a girl despite how completely certain we were that it wasn't.
 

Many, many moons ago my wife was pregnant with our second child. Her grandmother was convinced that the child was a boy. "You can tell it's a boy by how she's carrying him", she said. Silly folk wisdom. When we went for a regular ultrasound, though, the tech told us, too, that the child was a boy. We were completely certain, based on the information that we had, that our child would be a boy. In fact, the child was born a beautiful, healthy girl. Being convinced and certain that the child was a boy didn't make it so. The truth was ... the fact was... that the child was always a girl despite how completely certain we were that it wasn't.

I understand what you are saying but you missed my point.

Cheers, Loki
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top