TheCoinKid
Hero Member
- Thread starter
- #41
Very interesting. Thanks!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are probably right.Well, season three certainly hasn't brought much to the party when it comes to physical evidence. Any chance that changes in the season finale? Probably not.
No problem. I'm just a nitpicker about some things.
As for Oak Island, its been a part of Canadian folklore for ages. I first remember hearing about it in the late 60s/early 70s.
While many of the theories about the island are interesting, I've always had a hard time with the pirate buried treasure scenario. After all piracy was a pretty dangerous lifestyle and any day could be your last.
So the idea that pirates would bury their treasure, knowing that they may never live to return to it, has always struck me as being unrealistic. I would suspect that any pirate who amassed any booty is probably going to blow it on booze and women the first chance he gets.
Also, I'm not an expert on the history of Oak Island and the local area during the 18th century when piracy was in its heyday, but I understand that this part of Nova Scotia was pretty well inhabited by settlers, so the idea of pirates coming ashore and burying some treasure without being seen seems unlikely.
Anyway, my 2 cents worth.
what your looking for is absolute tangible proof that its there.sorry,if all the facts and evidence so far doesnt tell you something is unusual and there,then nothing will convince people like you.thats like saying show me proof of god.just look around you,proof is everywhere.you just have to open your eyes and quit doubting it.
what your looking for is absolute tangible proof that its there.sorry,if all the facts and evidence so far doesnt tell you something is unusual and there,then nothing will convince people like you.thats like saying show me proof of god.just look around you,proof is everywhere.you just have to open your eyes and quit doubting it.
Latitude was easy enough. Longitude? Maybe they were using ecliptic sky coordinates instead of polar. They could have determined the local north/south meridian and midnight easily enough at their local position, then observed certain star positions in the zodiac. They would have needed an ephemeris of similar ecliptic sightings from some fixed prime meridian (Giza?) to compare with, but if they had such data, they then could calculate the difference in longitude from the meridian.
what your looking for is absolute tangible proof that its there.sorry,if all the facts and evidence so far doesnt tell you something is unusual and there,then nothing will convince people like you.thats like saying show me proof of god.just look around you,proof is everywhere.you just have to open your eyes and quit doubting it.
Is there actually money/hoard of coins in the pit or is it the old artifacts that are found as money?