somehiker
Silver Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2007
- Messages
- 4,365
- Reaction score
- 6,435
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Gold or no gold
Part two
Reason 3
Actually a line of reasoning that is more difficult to debate,since much of the evidence is anecdotal.Evidence is best presented in documented form,first hand and fresh.Chronological diaries,official reports and independent witness accounts included with these reports make the best case for any argument.Buttressing "the yes there is" side, on which I stand,are military reports and witness corroberation testifying to at least a recoverable amount of placer gold in the Superstitions and general area.Military reports of the era of The Apache Wars include reference to military personnel having panned creek beds in overnight bivoac areas during search and destroy missions in the Superstition and Tonto areas.I believe that there was once a Command Directive to this effect,but have been unable to find my related reference material.In most cases gold was found in the pan,however the amounts were judged to be insufficient for commercial exploitation.I suspect that in these cases the results probably equaled the effort,however they do indicate the presence of gold in recoverable amounts over a widespread area.I see little reason to doubt the veracity of these accounts,considering the circumstances in which they were recorded.
This is purely conjecture on my part,but I suspect that two factors play a large role in the debate over the presence of larger deposits.The first is the geology and the fact that the caulderic explosions fractured the older terrain to such a degree,and then covered much of the older strata in deep layers of ash/tuff,thus limiting prospecting to exposed areas of older rock in canyon bottoms,outcroppings,or cliff faces.The second factor might be the violent human history and the fact that by the time that it was relatively safe to prospect the area(which only the hardiest and most determined might do anyway),times had changed and fewer were willing to commit to a desert prospector's lifestyle.Other jobs in growing industries and existing mines beckoned.Of those that remained and did,in fact,scour these mountains for gold or silver,how many might have had the knowledge required to have hada chance of success.Few,I suspect,would have "looked where no other miner would".
Regards---SH.
Part two
Reason 3
Actually a line of reasoning that is more difficult to debate,since much of the evidence is anecdotal.Evidence is best presented in documented form,first hand and fresh.Chronological diaries,official reports and independent witness accounts included with these reports make the best case for any argument.Buttressing "the yes there is" side, on which I stand,are military reports and witness corroberation testifying to at least a recoverable amount of placer gold in the Superstitions and general area.Military reports of the era of The Apache Wars include reference to military personnel having panned creek beds in overnight bivoac areas during search and destroy missions in the Superstition and Tonto areas.I believe that there was once a Command Directive to this effect,but have been unable to find my related reference material.In most cases gold was found in the pan,however the amounts were judged to be insufficient for commercial exploitation.I suspect that in these cases the results probably equaled the effort,however they do indicate the presence of gold in recoverable amounts over a widespread area.I see little reason to doubt the veracity of these accounts,considering the circumstances in which they were recorded.
This is purely conjecture on my part,but I suspect that two factors play a large role in the debate over the presence of larger deposits.The first is the geology and the fact that the caulderic explosions fractured the older terrain to such a degree,and then covered much of the older strata in deep layers of ash/tuff,thus limiting prospecting to exposed areas of older rock in canyon bottoms,outcroppings,or cliff faces.The second factor might be the violent human history and the fact that by the time that it was relatively safe to prospect the area(which only the hardiest and most determined might do anyway),times had changed and fewer were willing to commit to a desert prospector's lifestyle.Other jobs in growing industries and existing mines beckoned.Of those that remained and did,in fact,scour these mountains for gold or silver,how many might have had the knowledge required to have hada chance of success.Few,I suspect,would have "looked where no other miner would".
Regards---SH.