GoDeep
Bronze Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2016
- Messages
- 2,120
- Reaction score
- 4,517
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Detector(s) used
- Whites, Garrett, Minelab
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
All these google earth analysis pictures got me pulling my hair out. Don't get me wrong, they are part of the tool kit, but some are basing most all of their claims on them.
Let's see on the ground, up close pictures. Let's see pictures from the ground of these old formation clues (some of them natural, some man made). Lets see the sealed and unsealed entrances. Lets see inside the mine corridors. Let's see old tracks in the mine. Let's see the old wooden support beams. Let us see pictures of the gold itself. Let's see pictures of artifacts on the ground and left in the mine. Let's see the core samples of mines and their compositions. Let's run the samples of inside and outside the mine to see their gold production rate. All of that is absent in most all of these "finds" where they have claimed to solve the lost legend of some missing mine.
Let's see on the ground, up close pictures. Let's see pictures from the ground of these old formation clues (some of them natural, some man made). Lets see the sealed and unsealed entrances. Lets see inside the mine corridors. Let's see old tracks in the mine. Let's see the old wooden support beams. Let us see pictures of the gold itself. Let's see pictures of artifacts on the ground and left in the mine. Let's see the core samples of mines and their compositions. Let's run the samples of inside and outside the mine to see their gold production rate. All of that is absent in most all of these "finds" where they have claimed to solve the lost legend of some missing mine.
Last edited: