Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I like his idea and will be building mine with the spray bars on the outside. If I find it doesn't work that well then I can easily change it and if I do it will also be metal tubing inside so that it doesn't break like pvc.
Mine will have the spray bar down the drum made of black pipe. With the rotation of the drum and with the spray nozzles mounted to the outside the rocks are not receiving the washing as they would with the spray nozzles inside the drum. The drum while turning is deflecting the spray of water. I am building mine with 1/2 holes perforated steel rolled into a drum and welded. This will keep the drum straight and true and not having to deal with 3 separate pieces of metal, not that it would not be easy to align and make true but just a simpler approach.
<img src="http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=821185"/>
LOL! that's why I got a Dodge!Trying to make it light as possible. If my truck breaks down I can drag it back home. Hell with the truck! Lol!
I don't understand the huge classification area on these trommels. In my mind, 90% of the trommel should be holding water and washing rock. Then allow the rinse to pour into the sluice. Sort of like on this Angus MackirkMine will have the spray bar inside the drum made of black pipe. With the rotation of the drum and with the spray nozzles mounted to the outside the rocks are not receiving the washing as they would with the spray nozzles mounted inside the drum. The drum while turning is deflecting the spray of water. I am building mine with 1/2 holes perforated steel rolled into a drum and welded. This will keep the drum straight and true and not having to deal with 3 separate pieces of metals in getting the 3 pieces aligned and true. I have everything but the drum. Until the drum is in my hands I will not start the build. By my calculations the drum will have 1754 holes...
View attachment 821195
I don't understand the huge classification area on these trommels. In my mind, 90% of the trommel should be holding water and washing rock.
But your scoop underneath means that after 18", all the flowing water leaves the trommel. For the rest of the screening, only the spray bars are washing the rocks. During the first 18", the rocks are tumbling with the water from the trough and the first 18" of spray.The first link you have isn't a trommel its a wash plant. A trommel works better. All trommels have spray bars in the hopper. You could have a big trough with spray bars. You could built it however you want or buy one however you want. I want mine to be light weight and portable. So a large trough is just more weight. The dirt starts getting washed once it hits the hopper and washes through the trommel. You can wash the bigger rocks that don't drop through as long as you want. It just depends on the angle of the trommel.
Hope that helps.
I have decided that its more important to have a longer wash area and a smaller classification area. For me its a no brainer. The entire idea is to wash the rocks clean before the rocks move onto the classification area of the cylinder. Anything larger goes out the end of the cylinder while everything smaller than 1/2" will be deposited into the sluice. The cylinder will be ready for me to pick up once I am back from Las Vegas. I am having the cylinder rolled from 11 gauge mild steel and the finish cylinder will have over five hundred 1/2" holes. Also my latest drawing will have the 6.5HP engine mounted under the cylinder instead of being mounted on the side of the trommel. Again this seems more logical as in this design its free of the dirt being placed in the hopper while making the entire trommel shorter due to having a removable hopper. Trommel will have a metal spray bar through the cylinder.
JeromeAz your concern of the weight but I will tell you the weight of the lid of the enclosed trommel will outweigh an open top trommel with a metal spray bar through the cylinder. Even the author and builder has stated that he dislikes having the spray bar on the outside of the cylinder. Spraying from the outside through the mesh just cannot wash the rocks at the same level as being washed with the spray bar on the inside. Jog is craftsman and his build is top notch, I just don't like having the spray nozzles spraying through the mesh.
View attachment 822436
I have decided that its more important to have a longer wash area and a smaller classification area. For me its a no brainer. The entire idea is to wash the rocks clean before the rocks move onto the classification area of the cylinder. Anything larger goes out the end of the cylinder while everything smaller than 1/2" will be deposited into the sluice. The cylinder will be ready for me to pick up once I am back from Las Vegas. I am having the cylinder rolled from 11 gauge mild steel and the finish cylinder will have over five hundred 1/2" holes. Also my latest drawing will have the 6.5HP engine mounted under the cylinder instead of being mounted on the side of the trommel. Again this seems more logical as in this design its free of the dirt being placed in the hopper while making the entire trommel shorter due to having a removable hopper. Trommel will have a metal spray bar through the cylinder.
JeromeAz your concern of the weight but I will tell you the weight of the lid of the enclosed trommel will outweigh an open top trommel with a metal spray bar through the cylinder. Even the author and builder has stated that he dislikes having the spray bar on the outside of the cylinder. Spraying from the outside through the mesh just cannot wash the rocks at the same level as being washed with the spray bar on the inside. Jog is craftsman and his build is top notch, I just don't like having the spray nozzles spraying through the mesh.
<img src="http://www.treasurenet.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=822436"/>