My Movie

Attachments

  • awfulshiney.jpg
    awfulshiney.jpg
    52.1 KB · Views: 415
Bravo Art!
What distance did you set the examiner to limit?
I noticed that you actually don't do the complete boxing method. You rely pretty much on the cardinal signal lines. Also noticed that you seem to not use the setting that eliminates ringings as I could see that the antenna swings out the target in some instances. Do you confirm that, or was it just my impression?
The cardinal directions are the heart of my methods. I kept the distance at 10 feet until I knew I was close. The 2010 Ranger Tell Frequencies eliminates rings. I need to do more testing but they seem to eliminate the Micro-gold, Micro silver and hot rocks also.
That tells me that the model you have is older than mind. I have codes that will make it spin but do not use them.
I use a lot of gear when in the field with electronic LRLs to confirm and pinpoint the target and I find myself using the examiner less and less for pinpointing purposes. But I admit that using the RT alone is kind of a classic and really fun aproach.
I have always been a stickler for accuracy. I found that hitting the Tan button and entering 0.0005 that the target would always be under the front half of my heel. I usually place the marker beside that spot on my heel. On this movie I was careless when I marked the spot but I knew I was using a big shovel yesterday. My back was hurting so I did not bend over. I had the depth set at 2 inches so there was no way no to locate the target.
Thanks for the video. You really master this thing. Be careful, the MD industry will kill you...
In my opinion we are forcing the MD industry to make some big changes. By all the accessories and big coil advertisements I am certain that more and more treasure hunters are not happy with only hunting top the 6 inches…..Art
 

Art
Judging by the date on the silver dollar, ground conditions and
location of area found, and whatever else you can include,
how long do you estimate that silver dollar was in the ground?
 

This is very nearly too pathetic to dissect.
I have to wonder...
how is it that you just so happened to set up your
camera focused on a rock with silver underneath it?
Lets see now..I knew the target was within 10 foot of the sage brush on the east side. I knew that the target was under 2 inches deep. The rocks were not in the center. They were about in the center in the lower portion of the movie. I have heard that rumor before. Are you playing follow the leader? The target was about 4 inches from the bottom of the rock.
You put a colored marker where you think the target
is, then you sink the shovel directly into the marker
which indicates you knew the silver wasn't under
your marker but several inches away under the rock.
Known target obviously placed there by you.
Big shovel guy. My marking is very accurate. Keep assuming and you will be wrong forever.
I'd have to agree. Quite obviously he planted the target, but one has to wonder what thought processes Art goes through when he stages these things. He must realize several of us are going to see through the whole ruse.
I got you Ted. You belief that these tools are fake so anyone that finds any thing has to be cheating.
These futile attempts to fool us into thinking your dowsing gimmick can find totally "unknown" targets are humorous at best; but in reality are very sad too. I guess you are too close to the situation, and too taken in by the compelling ideomotor effect to understand how silly this is making you look.
Well Ted…since you claim you are not reading my post I guess you don’t know about the latest facts about the Ideomotor Effects. It seems that some real successful Doctors and Scientists understand the Ideomotor response much better now. They have learned that the Ideomotor Response is used by humans in every walk of life. Darn Scientists are spoiling all your glory
My sound does not work so I don't know what is being said
in the video. Is it his contention that this is an unknown
target that has been there for many years?
Is there some way to know how long something has been buried?
 

Attachments

  • untitled.jpg
    untitled.jpg
    27.4 KB · Views: 399
aarthrj3811 said:
Lets see now..I knew the target was within 10 foot of the sage brush on the east side. I knew that the target was under 2 inches deep. The rocks were not in the center. They were about in the center in the lower portion of the movie. I have heard that rumor before. Are you playing follow the leader? The target was about 4 inches from the bottom of the rock.

I knew that the target was under 2 inches deep

The target was about 4 inches from the bottom of the rock

HUH? You contradict yourself in the same paragraph,
and you clearly never measured where the coin was in
your shoveling so your statements about how far under the
rock it was are ludicrous!

If the silver was under the rock and the rock was undisturbed,
you would think the silver would have been there since it was
in circulation, at least 30 to 40 years, more likely alot longer.
How did the silver dollar come out looking like it just came out
of a coin protecter?
 

Attachments

  • awfulshiney.jpg
    awfulshiney.jpg
    52.1 KB · Views: 404
  • awfulshiney.jpg
    awfulshiney.jpg
    52.1 KB · Views: 402
pronghorn said:
How did the silver dollar come out looking like it just came out
of a coin protecter?

Easy. Because only minutes before, it came out of the same pocket he put it in right after he found(?) it.

Did you notice there was no soil attached to the coin. Every piece of old silver I've ever removed from the ground always had a lot of dirt attached to it.

The plain and simple fact is, Art will go to any extreme to rig up pictures or movies in support of what he claims. Unfortunately, for him, he is not very good at faking pictures or videos.
 

Ted Groves said:
Did you notice there was no soil attached to the coin. Every piece of old silver I've ever removed from the ground always had a lot of dirt attached to it.

My point exactly, I have never seen a Kennedy 64 half come out of
the ground so clean. We are supposed to believe this morgan was
under that perfectly centered in the movie screen rock for more
than an hour?
 

I'm sorry Art, but a coin just happens to be under the ONLY bigger rocks in the area?? The camera just happens to be zeroed in on that particular area?? Please, oh please, reread my original request regarding a video. And thanks for using a tripod for the camera, now you only need ONE person (you) to make a video. And BTW, nice clean coin, I wish I could unearth such clean coins. What's your secret?? I always have to clean mine, even the ones from the woodchips in the tot lots.

Thanks
 

davebien said:
And BTW, nice clean coin, I wish I could unearth such clean coins. What's your secret?? I always have to clean mine, even the ones from the woodchips in the tot lots.


The resonance of the coin is amplified by the LRL, causing the dirt (which would resonate at a different frequency) to no longer bind. This also works with tarnish.
These resonant waves are of such a high frequency (trillions of Hertz), with the wavelength being so close, that they almost form a solid. This can be felt when you pass your hand in front.
If the LRL is used in the Arctic these waves will also become super-conductive, and therefore visible.





.... or not.
 

Saturna said:
davebien said:
And BTW, nice clean coin, I wish I could unearth such clean coins. What's your secret?? I always have to clean mine, even the ones from the woodchips in the tot lots.


The resonance of the coin is amplified by the LRL, causing the dirt (which would resonate at a different frequency) to no longer bind. This also works with tarnish.
These resonant waves are of such a high frequency (trillions of Hertz), with the wavelength being so close, that they almost form a solid. This can be felt when you pass your hand in front.
If the LRL is used in the Arctic these waves will also become super-conductive, and therefore visible.

.... or not.

I recognize and appreciate your humor, but I fear there are some of the readership here that will miss your subtleties and at this very moment may be out in some remote region of the cold Montana outback... trying desperately to see the super-conductive waves you spoke about. ;D
 

I can see that the excuse factor is again in full swing. Now one Skeptic has admitted that they have “ noda, zilch, nothing” no proof that LRL’s or MFD’s do not work. You want to know what their excuse is? Us stupid LRL and MFD user will not go and take a Double Blind Test so It is our fault they have no proof..That is one great excuse.
I also have a skeptic who says Random Chance may not be responsible for finds in the field. They also say that Random chance can only be used under strict guide lines…so now that myth or excuse is no longer available to you.
I also have proven that Scientist know about the signal lines that we use. My movies show how I am able to use these signal lines to find treasure. Another excuse shot down..
We also have put real facts on here that the Ideomotor Response can be trained. So much for the hands moving.
Now for the movie..
The coin I found was to clean? Come on guys you can do better than that.
The coin was under the rock…
Did you see any foot prints before I walk to the target? Did you notice how many roots were in the dirt that I shoveled out of the ground? Did you see that the ground or the rock had not been disturbed in any way? And by the way...The coin was 6 inches from the rock buried less than 2 inches deep. How do I know this...The Ranger Tell told me.
Can any of you experts tell me how you can tell how long a coin has been in the ground? I have dug very few coins so I don’t really know what they are suppose to look like but I guess you guys do.
I have showed you my practice methods and now how I hunt in the field. I have an idea for one more movie if I should decide to do it. There is no doubt that the this operator and his Ranger Tell perform as the Manufacturer states on his web site.
You guys are a bunch of Losers….Art
 

Your movies

Please (Art), spare us from anymore of your concocted, staged movies where you un-earth your planted coins. No one was fooled by your attempt at trickery. These futile attempts to demonstrate how your Examiner is "physically" indicating your pseudo-unknown targets is really bringing a lot of embarrassment to yourself.

Your next movie should be the one you keep avoiding making. Why are you avoiding it? Is it because you already know what it will prove to YOU and those that would see it?

Since you have so much free time on your hands, give it a shot. What have you got to lose; your credibility is already at 0 (zero), so it can't go any lower.

Make the movie where your L-rods are fastened tightly in the holding fixture. Hold them very steady, slightly tilted down, so they are somewhat stabilized and straight out in front of you (not flopping around), then step on the Morgen Silver Dollar and show us how the rods cross; and then uncross when you remove your foot.

You don't even have to go outside to do that movie, you can do it in the privacy of your mobile home.

What are you afraid of? ;D
 

Please (Art), spare us from anymore of your concocted, staged movies where you un-earth your planted coins. No one was fooled by your attempt at trickery. These futile attempts to demonstrate how your Examiner is "physically" indicating your pseudo-unknown targets is really bringing a lot of embarrassment to yourself.
You are wrong again Ted. As usual you will not except any kind of proof that your belief system is wacky. Thanks to you skeptics I have found a tool to prove that all your garbage is just that..Garbage that is backed up with no proof just a wacky belief system. Welcome to the real world Ted….
And now ..You have the guts to ask me to prove you wrong again…Wake up and smell the coffee. I do all this for the real treasure hunters on T-Net. I have to go now and answer a lot of e-mails from real treasure hunters that use this equipment. No I am not embarrassed about my movies as they are a hit with the people that count….Art
 

Ted Groves said:
I recognize and appreciate your humor, but I fear there are some of the readership here that will miss your subtleties and at this very moment may be out in some remote region of the cold Montana outback... trying desperately to see the super-conductive waves you spoke about. ;D


LOL, it's fun making up science. :icon_sunny:
 

aarthrj3811 said:
I can see that the excuse factor is again in full swing. Now one Skeptic has admitted that they have “ noda, zilch, nothing” no proof that LRL’s or MFD’s do not work. You want to know what their excuse is? Us stupid LRL and MFD user will not go and take a Double Blind Test so It is our fault they have no proof..That is one great excuse.
I also have a skeptic who says Random Chance may not be responsible for finds in the field. They also say that Random chance can only be used under strict guide lines…so now that myth or excuse is no longer available to you.
I also have proven that Scientist know about the signal lines that we use. My movies show how I am able to use these signal lines to find treasure. Another excuse shot down..
We also have put real facts on here that the Ideomotor Response can be trained. So much for the hands moving.
Now for the movie..
The coin I found was to clean? Come on guys you can do better than that.
The coin was under the rock…
Did you see any foot prints before I walk to the target? Did you notice how many roots were in the dirt that I shoveled out of the ground? Did you see that the ground or the rock had not been disturbed in any way? And by the way...The coin was 6 inches from the rock buried less than 2 inches deep. How do I know this...The Ranger Tell told me.
Can any of you experts tell me how you can tell how long a coin has been in the ground? I have dug very few coins so I don’t really know what they are suppose to look like but I guess you guys do.
I have showed you my practice methods and now how I hunt in the field. I have an idea for one more movie if I should decide to do it. There is no doubt that the this operator and his Ranger Tell perform as the Manufacturer states on his web site.
You guys are a bunch of Losers….Art
And this isn't more apparent that when you "dug" up this silver dollar. Do you know it's really difficult to recover large silver in public areas? This is because even the cheapest detectors can easliy find large silver, and they've been doing so for 40 years or more.. Do you know that silver, even being in the ground for a short amount of time, just doesn't come out looking that clean? Apparently not....
 

And this isn't more apparent that when you "dug" up this silver dollar. Do you know it's really difficult to recover large silver in public areas? This is because even the cheapest detectors can easliy find large silver, and they've been doing so for 40 years or more.. Do you know that silver, even being in the ground for a short amount of time, just doesn't come out looking that clean? Apparently not....

Do you know it's really difficult to recover large silver in public areas?
I would not know that as I have only searched twice in a public park. I do remember finding a few silver dollars on those trips and they looked pretty good. Come to Nevada and may be easier.
.. Do you know that silver, even being in the ground for a short amount of time, just doesn't come out looking that clean? Apparently not....
More excuses because all your theories went up in smoke. I do not think that is true and I am not going to experiment to learn the truth. I have found silver flakes and nuggets that were not tarnished. They were in the ground for millions of years. Grow up AF.

It is always better to have no ideas than false ones; to believe nothing, than to believe what is wrong.
 

aarthrj3811 said:
.. Do you know that silver, even being in the ground for a short amount of time, just doesn't come out looking that clean? Apparently not....
More excuses because all your theories went up in smoke. I do not think that is true and I am not going to experiment to learn the truth. I have found silver flakes and nuggets that were not tarnished. They were in the ground for millions of years. Grow up AF.
What theory, Art?? It's not a theory. It looks as though I have a lot more experience recovering silver coins from public areas than you do, so you can consider this a fact, not a theory. Look at the photos of recoveries in the metal detecting areas of the site, and tell me how many coins come out of the ground as clean as yours. And not just this coin, but all of them you've posted.

Just because you "think" something isn't true just means you don't know whether it's true or not.
 

aarthrj3811 said:
Bravo Art!
What distance did you set the examiner to limit?
I noticed that you actually don't do the complete boxing method. You rely pretty much on the cardinal signal lines. Also noticed that you seem to not use the setting that eliminates ringings as I could see that the antenna swings out the target in some instances. Do you confirm that, or was it just my impression?
The cardinal directions are the heart of my methods. I kept the distance at 10 feet until I knew I was close. The 2010 Ranger Tell Frequencies eliminates rings. I need to do more testing but they seem to eliminate the Micro-gold, Micro silver and hot rocks also.
That tells me that the model you have is older than mind. I have codes that will make it spin but do not use them.
I use a lot of gear when in the field with electronic LRLs to confirm and pinpoint the target and I find myself using the examiner less and less for pinpointing purposes. But I admit that using the RT alone is kind of a classic and really fun aproach.
I have always been a stickler for accuracy. I found that hitting the Tan button and entering 0.0005 that the target would always be under the front half of my heel. I usually place the marker beside that spot on my heel. On this movie I was careless when I marked the spot but I knew I was using a big shovel yesterday. My back was hurting so I did not bend over. I had the depth set at 2 inches so there was no way no to locate the target.
Thanks for the video. You really master this thing. Be careful, the MD industry will kill you...
In my opinion we are forcing the MD industry to make some big changes. By all the accessories and big coil advertisements I am certain that more and more treasure hunters are not happy with only hunting top the 6 inches…..Art

Art,
My model is about the same age as yours. Around 3 to 4 years old.
Regarding the code to avoid ringings, it's the one which is featured in the manual. I think you probably know what it is as it's not my intention provide this info here.
I'm using the latest frequencies which are very good for man made and natural gold, but they don't avoid ringings alone. You must enter that 'code' for this.
There's a very simple procedure to test it. Just lay a ring, coin, whatever on the floor or even over a table. Enter the frequency alone. Now walk away from the target and you will see the antenna swinging out in increments each 4 or 5 feet. These are the ringings. Now enter the freq and then the code. You will see that the antenna no more swings and keeps staring in the direction of the target.
I always use the code. Always. This makes me totally sure about the target's location. But of course you have your own technique which works best for you. Congratulations again for the video.
You will be the one guy who will lead the conventional MD industry to bankrupcy... :notworthy:

PS. By the way, I just saw Carl Moreland in a video... Boy, physically, he is way out different from the look I would expect from a raging skeptic. Few hair, a nice beard and thin voice. He looks a harmless dentist or psychologist, never a raging bull skeptic... :laughing7:
 

hung said:
You will be the one guy who will lead the conventional MD industry to bankrupcy... :notworthy:


Hahaha, nice to see you have a sense of humor, Hung.
Maybe we should save your post and check back with you in 10 or 20 years and see how your prediction worked out.
 

Saturna said:
hung said:
You will be the one guy who will lead the conventional MD industry to bankrupcy... :notworthy:


Hahaha, nice to see you have a sense of humor, Hung.
Maybe we should save your post and check back with you in 10 or 20 years and see how your prediction worked out.
And if this shows anything at all, it's that the reality of the believers here is completely off-kilter. Does Hung actually believe that one individual could bring down the entire metal detector industry, or was this a lame attempt at an insult?
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top