aarthrj3811
Gold Member
Glad to see you agree that a Radiodynamometer proves nothing. Maybe there's hope for you yet.
Yes it proves nothing…The only thing that a book or an experiment can tell you is what you are willing to learn…Art
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Glad to see you agree that a Radiodynamometer proves nothing. Maybe there's hope for you yet.
That's true. Of course, one can easily skew that learning by only reading books that agree with their point of view, or by only performing experiments they already know the outcomes of.aarthrj3811 said:Glad to see you agree that a Radiodynamometer proves nothing. Maybe there's hope for you yet.
Yes it proves nothing…The only thing that a book or an experiment can tell you is what you are willing to learn…Art
Ding, ding, ding, ding.....aarthrj3811 said:As I have pointed out before…I checked many objects…Of course I was most interested in gold and silver. The thing that amazed me was that an onion turned the disk more than anything else that I tried. This is a valid experiment. The jar is air proof so don’t give me that smell excuse. This week we have studied the Ideomotor response and the fact that objects omit a signal that can be measured. That answers all your questions. The only thing that can be determined is that Dowsing Works and the fact that you have been proved to wrong…Art
This is a valid experiment. As has been shown, you don't know what a Radiodynamometer is, what a Radiodynamometer does, nor what a Radiodynamometer measures. How can you possible claim it's a valid experiment when you don't even know what you're doing?
2. The jar is air proof so don’t give me that smell excuse. You didn't create a vacuum, so the jar is not air-proof.
Don’t you wish4. the fact that objects omit a signal that can be measured. What are you referring to, because it can't possibly be the Radiodynamometer. See #1.
5. That answers all your questions. Not quite. Radiodynamometer; What is it, what does it measure, how does it work?
.The only thing that can be determined is that Dowsing Works and the fact that you have been proved to wrong....Art This one is just too easy
Seems like the only fact in your post is your name, Art....
That's a great question Art. What did turn the disk? Certainly if you have the book and it's so simple anyone can do the experiments, surely it actually tells you what is turning the disk, i.e. the point of the experiment?aarthrj3811 said:This is a valid experiment. As has been shown, you don't know what a Radiodynamometer is, what a Radiodynamometer does, nor what a Radiodynamometer measures. How can you possible claim it's a valid experiment when you don't even know what you're doing?
Did the disk not turn…What turned the disk? The book as simple instructions on how to do the experiments. So simple that anyone can do the experiments
Huh? The jar isn't air-proof because you didn't create a vacuum in the jar. There is air in the jar, so it is not air-proof. Simple, really it is. What does this have to do with putting a jar in the fridge?aarthrj3811 said:2. The jar is air proof so donÂ’t give me that smell excuse. You didn't create a vacuum, so the jar is not air-proof.
When you put a jar in the fridge do you suck the air out of it
Don't I wish what? I wish you could find the time between splattering this thread with your nonsense to just explain what this machine is and what it's supposed to do. That's what I wish, Art.aarthrj3811 said:DonÂ’t you wish4. the fact that objects omit a signal that can be measured. What are you referring to, because it can't possibly be the Radiodynamometer. See #1.
Now we're getting somewhere! Okay, it's measuring emissions from objects? Great.aarthrj3811 said:5. That answers all your questions. Not quite. Radiodynamometer; What is it, what does it measure, how does it work?
It measures emissions from objects
Umm, so you got your name wrong?aarthrj3811 said:Seems like the only fact in your post is your name, Art....
Another wrong fact....Art
Bottom line is dowsers have an innate fear of seeing that all they believe in is incorrect and can't stand up to a simple test.
Do you know what day of the week it is, Dell? Have you taken any falls lately? Any bumps to the head?
Care to discuss common sense with me, Dell? It'd really be a stretch for you, I know.
What part of "information leakage" do you not understand, Art? Could you not find a listing in your Wikipedia
I saw some of those down at my local rock and gem shop, Art. How much did you pay for yours?
And here goes Art again, ignoring the most basic scientific findings and pretending he holds the secret to the universe that everyone else is searching for.
Delusions of grandeur, anyone?
I've tried to tell them you just have to pick the rocks up, but they insist that they can't find them without the coathangers.
None are so blind as those that refuse to see.....
Okay, where? Please show me any respectable scientific publication that proves the existance of these signal lines as detected by a brass rod.
Again, read man! Before you go spouting off perhaps you should have at least the tiniest comprehension of the conversation?
You don't get it, Art, and you never will. I for one am tired of trying to teach you anything.
You have nothing intelligent to add to a conversation and simply clutter up this board with your nonsense.
Oh no, wait. I get it now. Art doesn't understand the definition he quoted himself. Try this. Read the definition again, sound out the bigger words or ask someone for help, then get back with us.
I'm actually amazed that you were able to understand Occam's Razor enough to come to that conclusion. Aren't you glad the wool has been lifted from your eyes?
"Bearing false witness..."
How's that grab ya, Art?
No. But, like the old saying goes, if an infinite number of monkeys banged on an infinite number of typewriters....
Stick with what I can prove? Well, I've proven that you have the vocabulary of a 9-year-old and the mentailty of a 12-year-old. Your knowledge of reading and comprehension is so bad it seems you did not graduate 6th grade.
aarthrj3811 said:Bottom line is dowsers have an innate fear of seeing that all they believe in is incorrect and can't stand up to a simple test.
Do you know what day of the week it is, Dell? Have you taken any falls lately? Any bumps to the head?
Care to discuss common sense with me, Dell? It'd really be a stretch for you, I know.
What part of "information leakage" do you not understand, Art? Could you not find a listing in your Wikipedia
I saw some of those down at my local rock and gem shop, Art. How much did you pay for yours?
And here goes Art again, ignoring the most basic scientific findings and pretending he holds the secret to the universe that everyone else is searching for.
Delusions of grandeur, anyone?
I've tried to tell them you just have to pick the rocks up, but they insist that they can't find them without the coathangers.
None are so blind as those that refuse to see.....
Okay, where? Please show me any respectable scientific publication that proves the existance of these signal lines as detected by a brass rod.
Again, read man! Before you go spouting off perhaps you should have at least the tiniest comprehension of the conversation?
You don't get it, Art, and you never will. I for one am tired of trying to teach you anything.
You have nothing intelligent to add to a conversation and simply clutter up this board with your nonsense.
Oh no, wait. I get it now. Art doesn't understand the definition he quoted himself. Try this. Read the definition again, sound out the bigger words or ask someone for help, then get back with us.
I'm actually amazed that you were able to understand Occam's Razor enough to come to that conclusion. Aren't you glad the wool has been lifted from your eyes?
"Bearing false witness..."
How's that grab ya, Art?
No. But, like the old saying goes, if an infinite number of monkeys banged on an infinite number of typewriters....
And the winner is….
Stick with what I can prove? Well, I've proven that you have the vocabulary of a 9-year-old and the mentailty of a 12-year-old. Your knowledge of reading and comprehension is so bad it seems you did not graduate 6th grade.
What kind of emissions?
What unit of measure does it use?
How does it communicate the amount of emissions to you?
On paper this looks great, but the problem is that we have no clue what the original intent of the machine was. Another big issue I'm having is the fact that there only seem to be two sources of this information, Art and Dobler. That alone is very telling.Real de Tayopa said:HI af mi friend: You said--->
"Looking at your description of the machine, it seems likely that the heat of your hand going near the jar to place objects could cause the aluminum foil to warm slightly and that could explain the turning. Or, even more likely, the spiderweb of glue warms and causes the turning."
~~~~~~~~~
Being of a true scientific mind, and wanting to actually learn instead of merely down grading someone, why don't you just built it and test it yourself
Don Jose de La Mancha
And how did you come up with your understanding that the Radiodynamometer evolved into the MRI machine? I'm really curious about this one.aarthrj3811 said:What kind of emissions?
What unit of measure does it use?
How does it communicate the amount of emissions to you?
I hope you can understand this…Dr.Paul Dobler PHD says he was measuring millimeter electronic wave band.. This was in the 1930’s. It is my understanding that the Radiodynamometer has evolved into what is known as a MRI machine. It turns the alum disk a different amount of degrees for each object that you check. …Art
"The door to knowledge & understanding is always open, I can’t make you come in and want to learn"…Art
As for the "Radiodynamometer", if there is something that can be shown, to proove that ordinary innert objects, like coins or treasures (let's forget water for the moment) emit signals that can be measured for distances,
I think you missed the really important pieces of Tom's post, Art.aarthrj3811 said:As for the "Radiodynamometer", if there is something that can be shown, to proove that ordinary innert objects, like coins or treasures (let's forget water for the moment) emit signals that can be measured for distances,
This instrument only tells us that inert objects emit energy that can be measured by how many degrees that an alum disk turns. Nothing about distance. I don’t need a test for distance as I can follow this energy to it’ source…Art
Surely just an oversight on your part.Tom_in_CA said:As for the "Radiodynamometer", if there is something that can be shown, to proove that ordinary innert objects, like coins or treasures (let's forget water for the moment) emit signals that can be measured for distances, I'd be interested in seeing a link. Surely in this day and age of any possible subject a person can dream up, being a click-away, there ought to be something about this on the net? I mean, all the things you're saying are interesting, but of course, it's just you saying them here (nothing wrong with that). Just wondering if there's a base source (science journal? encyclopedic entry? etc...) that talks about this. And not only that, but how these "signals", can make an ordinary brass rod turn. Thanx.
On paper this looks great, but the problem is that we have no clue what the original intent of the machine was. Another big issue I'm having is the fact that there only seem to be two sources of this information, Art and Dobler. That alone is very telling.
Okay, smarty. So tell me, if it's so simple......what's millimeter electronic wave band?aarthrj3811 said:On paper this looks great, but the problem is that we have no clue what the original intent of the machine was. Another big issue I'm having is the fact that there only seem to be two sources of this information, Art and Dobler. That alone is very telling.
It is a simple device that was used to measure millimeter electronic wave band..
Have a Disney Day. ..Art