Frankn my good man, "Cross on Rock" is a " tale" of a legendary treasure, not a Cache buried as part of Beil's exodus burying caches. Really though, you are the only one talking anywhere about a second Cache in the area. In fact you keep mentioning it on the other site and nobody ever responds to your comments about it.... no doubt busy scratching their heads wondering what you are talking about. You even said you had two "X,s" on one cache, and three "X,s" on the other, and still nobody commented about there being two caches.
Did you not notice the other comments asking where your "X,s" were for THE Cache? Nobody yet has used a "plural" in speaking of the Clinton county Cache burial.... just you and anyone who blindly accepts what you have to say.
And wait.... I can see it coming, you are going to go on about me not doing my research and due diligence again. Whenever confronted with a discrepancy you play the "do your research, practice due diligence" card, without providing even the slightest of supporting evidence. You turn the tab!es. How about practicing what you preach and provide a reference... ANY reference, supporting your "twin Cache" theory. You talked about a video yet none is available; you mentioned dates that do not coincide with the official statements given on the website sponsoring the caches; you confuse historical accounts with the designed cache stories.
I am not saying you are purposely misleading people or making false statements. I am however suggesting your research is not perfect. An example would be how I mentioned the probable location of John Realville's first home, and you shot back the elevation it must have been at, further suggesting it was wrong. But you never considered that surveys almost two hundred years ago was almost like using sticks and stones while using "strides and paces" for lateral measurements, while today we use satellite radar imagery and echo devices to sense fractions of inches. For the most part this is using inaccurate and/or ineffectual information to support your theories.
Your "resume'" of where you post and visit are not proof of your accuracy either, nor are they impressive to everyone. Look how many places you can find posts about Fenn, but in your mind they are all false. Moral here is that frequency of posting is not a very good indicator of correctness, so neither is your resume of how much you get around. In fact, I find them ( your posts and differing renditions between sites) quite contradictory. To use an assimilation, no matter how many time Frankn's says the White house in Washington is purple, it will still be just plain old "white", regardless of how many web sites he uses.
As far as your #96 post, the immediate problem I have is you never addressed the contradictions. You just painted over everything with subjective comments and hearsay. Nor did you address the level and direction of comments, (or more accurately " lack of" comments) concerning the phantom "lost cross cache on the other site. Try again maybe?
BTW, neither of your "X,s" are on the right location for the one and only Cache in Clinton County Pa!