KANACKI
Bronze Member
- Mar 1, 2015
- 1,445
- 5,933
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kanaci.mi amigo. this is the why and whereforView attachment 1690635 of the Tayopa I wont point out Tayopa out of spite to those ompanies that hsd aadGod as thier chief geologist, or so the "geologist" thought.
Hello all again
In 2009 Hertfordshire England Terry Herbert while detecting farmland in Stafford shire discovered on of largest Anglo Saxon treasure hoards yet so discovered. Worth about 4.3 million USD
View attachment 1690595
The hoard contained a massive collection of sword hilt, silver and gold crosses dating back to 1500 years.
Not a bad payday for days metal detecting?
Kanacki
Hi, in Mexico basically it is 50/50 on private land if you have permision , 100% to the landowner if you don't. Same for fed lands but it is tricky.even with permission.
Kanacki, I enjoyed your tale of the Texans and the Drumbeat. When my Dad went into the Navy in WW2, I don't think he'd ever even been on a row boat. His first three days aboard ship at sea, he was so sick he "couldn't hit his butt with both hands at the same time". A kind cook gave him crackers and apple slices that he was able to keep down. He was sick until his ship made contact with a German U Boat and the General Quarters alarm sounded. His Battle station was at a hatch to pass Hedgehogs (a projectile kind of like a mortar round, they weighed like 70 pounds) up to the deck. He was passing them, one in each hand as fast as he could. After that he wasn't sick another day. That included a Typhoon on Christmas Day of 45' off the Aleutian Islands of Alaska.
Hope you and Mi Major keep the tales coming. Good luck.
Hello Don Jose
Its same in many countries although each country has different interpretations of treasure trove laws. Some depend on the age of item etc.. In South America they do not give a dam about colonial relics. However if native get thee to scaffold. :-) Ironic as revisionists seem want write out their colonial past. The is real danger of revisionist history can be manipulated to suit the in favor agenda of the day.
That can flow onto policy making in regards to treasure trove laws.
If possible the less you have to do with bureaucrats the better?
For example in the process of stating in non incriminating terms the person or persons involved? Get my drift? :-)
There is certain "some one" who pulled fast one late last year. Masterminded in one country circumvented the laws in another. Purchased a property by proxy. Discovered treasure resold the property inflated the value of property in calculation of the treasure on the property. Then organised international monetary transactions through various accounts then divide shares among those involved.
No treasure laws was violated. No treasure was removed. Thus the discovery became the discretion of the new property owner. Who paid for the property that had treasure discounted enough for him to make a nice profit also. If he should chose to make the discovery public.
Thus the treasure trove law not allowing foreigners to benefit from treasure was technically circumvented. Not one bureaucrat was involved in fact none of them was even aware the deal had taken place. the entire transaction was done deal in two weeks, And a few locals involved was paid off.
Of course when a few locals became flush with cash inevitably some one will spill the beans. The local mayor got wind of matter and made an attempt to get a cut. Other wise he was going to make a big stink. However he got flown out to another country, fed booze and wild women then shunted off back to hole he crawled out from. left wondering with no proof because people who was in the know wasn't talking.
They was too busy counting their money. :-)
Kanacki