Just a question

Older The Better

Silver Member
Apr 24, 2017
3,355
6,569
south east kansas
Detector(s) used
Whites Eagle Spectrum
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I was thinking of the little thumb scraper I found and gender roles among Indians, how it probably was a womanā€™s tool to process a hide or foodā€¦ then i thought of something I never really had beforeā€¦ were there woman knappers? Or would men make the tools and hand them off? I donā€™t think Iā€™ve come across anything that looks at that subject. Any thoughts or does anyone know? Also just in the spirit of a treasure net post Iā€™ll throw in a pic of the area and a couple animal friends
IMG_4507.jpeg
IMG_4514.jpeg
IMG_4513.jpeg
IMG_4512.jpeg
 

Upvote 16
Interesting question.

No other details given, but this is a quote from Dale Weisman in an article on the Texas Parks & Wildlife website:

Archaeological evidence suggests that women in prehistory made stone tools and projectile points, and some Native American women were buried with their knapping tools.

Also this abstract from ā€œFeminine Knowledge and Skill Reconsidered: Women and Flaked Stone Toolsā€ by Kathryn Weedman Arthur in ā€œAmerican Anthropologistā€ published 19 May 2010 (the full paper is behind a paywall):

Archaeologists continue to describe Stone Age women as home bound and their lithic technologies as unskilled, expedient, and of low quality. However, today a group of Konso women [in Ethiopia, not America] make, use, and discard flaked stone tools to process hides, offering us an alternative to the man-the-toolmaker model and redefining Western ā€œnaturalizedā€ gender roles. These Konso women are skilled knappers who develop their expertise through long-term practice and apprenticeship. Their lithic technology demonstrates that an individual's level of skill and age are visible in stone assemblages. Most importantly, they illustrate that women procure high-quality stone from long distances, produce formal tools with skill, and use their tools efficiently. I suggest in this article that archaeologists should consider women the producers of Paleolithic stone scrapers, engaged in bipolar technology, and as such perhaps responsible for some of the earliest-known lithic technologies.
 

Thanks for the deeper dive redcoat, and I agree why not, naā€™s were smarter and more capable than they usually get credit for, and plenty were matriarchalā€¦ when looking at the scraper i pictured a woman having to ask a male figure to make a tool and it seemed like an inefficient dynamic if she could just do it herself.
 

EXCELLENT question! :thumbsup:

Thanks for the deeper dive redcoat, and I agree why not,
+1. The Texas article is good. I wish there were more substantiation; maybe there is, but it's doing a good job of hiding from me! šŸ™

I do love these little rabbit holes warrens though.... Like Forrest Gump's box-o-chocolates (food of the gods!), you never know what you're going to find....

First female Chief of the Cherokee Nation:
Wilma Mankiller,
1945-2010

Works on a few levels.
 

The way it has been taught to me is everyone was skilled in pretty much every task that had to be done, so it isn't surprising. Beliefs that the men were the only ones that hunted while women stayed behind to pick berries and raise babies are incorrect. Hunting (and later raiding) for the men wasn't a day shift job, leaving in the morning and home for dinner. They were gone days, weeks, sometimes even months. Women literally had to hold down the fort and have all the skills to survive in the environment.
 

Thatā€™s a good point, in my immediate area the Osage would go on large hunts multiple times a year, not everyone could go, sick, old, that kind of thing. those that stayed behind would have to be just as capable of surviving.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top