Cactusjumper wrote
Are you saying that "liquid mercury" is not an ingredient used to make Calomel?
I never said that; however you are now implying that the reason father Och was packing around a flask of mercury, was for making his own calomel. Considering that his own written words state what he used that mercury for, namely for testing gold, and there is NO MENTION of any other use by him, whom is reaching here?
Springfield wrote
Oro, unfortunately, the best way to recover silver/gold from low-grade copper ore (very similar metal values as your slag assay presented earlier) is by concentrating the metals, recovering the silver through flotation, then scraping the bottoms of the flotation cells where the gold fines settle out. Then you can amalgamate these fines for the gold. This was tricky business, if even possible in those days. It would be costly for small batches - most folks just sell the concentrates to a smelter (if you can find one nowadays). I wonder how they would have done this in those days? Heck, maybe the guys who took the slag weren't after the silver - maybe they were selling it for railroad track ballast or road fill?
Perhaps they sold the slag for ships ballast. I was not there. However once again, you dismiss the written record, which states it was sold for the silver content.
Please show me some record that the slag was hauled away for another purpose?
Also, you continue to use modern ideas to approach something which occurred in the 19th century; what did the charcoal cost, for a local smelter in the 1800s? What did it cost to run a water powered air bellows? And, where does it say that the slag was a "small batch" at all? From what I read of the written record, the mounds of slag were impressive, and could well amount to a number of tons, not a "small batch".
Here is a big problem with these attempts to find alternate explanations -
they are not supported by any source near to the events. The sources we do have, on the other hand, give a clear and logical explanation. Then there are those pesky silver and gold mines, and
not one copper mine mentioned by anyone among the Jesuits, nor the Americans who followed. We have these "legends" originating with the very same Indians whom had been under the padres, and no counter-legend from these sources claiming there were no such silver mines, no smelting, just farming, etc. It is a circumstantial case, but we now have that admittance by a Jesuit whom was operating in Pimeria Alta, namely father Segesser, complaining that he could not work the mines securely and thus raise money easily, along with his mention of being in the "silver mountains" not the "copper mountains". Remember the letter from the martyred padre Saeta, so recently arrived at Caborca, how he would soon be able to pay for the items on his shopping list in silver? Where do you propose he was getting silver? We might note that Saeta did not say silver COIN, nor money, just the word - silver.
So yes, perhaps the slag was removed for some utterly innocent purpose, filling in a hole in a back yard or grading a railroad bed, or who knows what, yet there is NO such source which claims this - rather, the ONLY source with an explanation states what happened to it. And yes perhaps those copper bells being cast, were made from imported copper and donated jewelry, which would hardly produce any slag worth notice, yet we have records of people who saw impressive mounds of slag at several missions. Yes perhaps father Och was packing around liquid mercury, for preserving wood and making medicinal calomel, yet in his own words he tells of what he DID use it for, testing gold! Perhaps none of the missions ever had any hand in mining - yet we know that the Jesuit Order openly owned and operated mines in Mexico, that a bishop even complained of their accumulating of wealth and property. We do not have the opposite kind of proof, that they were dirt-poor, that the Spanish didn't bother to search for any treasure since they knew the padres were so dirt poor and so on.
Oroblanco