Smithbrown
Bronze Member
- May 22, 2006
- 1,036
- 923
No, Robot, they disagree with various of the interpretations, including yours. That's not the same as refusing to review the data.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The problem I have had with the money pit containing treasure: How do you recover it if upon returning when someone has sprung the trap? There is another way to recover it or if it is cannon and weapons, you would rather it was lost then get into the wrong hands and there would be no attempt to recover it!
I'd go a little further than "pile of manure" in the Oak island case, it's more along the lines of a "pile of horse."
Who's being disrespectful?Robot, with all due respect, I fail to see how this pit could ever have been dug in the 1700s, particularly if there were English connections. The Mi'kmaw hated the English and with good reason. If they had seen this going on, for they most certainly would have in this area, they would have advised the French asap. No distinction would be made as to whether those folks were from across the ocean or from the colonies. To the Mi'kmaw they would have been English and that would have been more than enough. Plus, there were settlers already coming to this area. They most certainly would not have remained quiet.
I have no qualms with theories being posted here. None whatsoever, nor will I deride them or make fun of them. That's just not right. I can only hope that one day whatever was on this island is figured out. As to treasure, well it does come in all forms, some of which may lie in getting the answer.
I just wish folks wouldn't be so quick to condemn others' theories. Disagree with them - absolutely. Can we all not do that respectfully?
Why those specific stars from different constellations of all the visible stars? Chosen because they line up?
Robot, with all due respect, I fail to see how this pit could ever have been dug in the 1700s, particularly if there were English connections. The Mi'kmaw hated the English and with good reason. If they had seen this going on, for they most certainly would have in this area, they would have advised the French asap. No distinction would be made as to whether those folks were from across the ocean or from the colonies. To the Mi'kmaw they would have been English and that would have been more than enough. Plus, there were settlers already coming to this area. They most certainly would not have remained quiet.
I have no qualms with theories being posted here. None whatsoever, nor will I deride them or make fun of them. That's just not right. I can only hope that one day whatever was on this island is figured out. As to treasure, well it does come in all forms, some of which may lie in getting the answer.
I just wish folks wouldn't be so quick to condemn others' theories. Disagree with them - absolutely. Can we all not do that respectfully?
Dave, with all due respect, referring to the mystery of Oak Island as a "pile of manure" as you call it, well that's not right. I realize you think it's all a big hoax. That's fine and I respect that. But "pile of manure"? Dan Blankenship has artefacts by the way. Why don't you call him and ask to see this "manure". C'mon now Dave, geesh - did you run out of caffeine today?
Like other Oak Island Money Pit skeptics, many of the skeptics on this forum refuse to review the data relevant to the evidence presented.
The problem I have had with the money pit containing treasure: How do you recover it if upon returning when someone has sprung the trap? There is another way to recover it or if it is cannon and weapons, you would rather it was lost then get into the wrong hands and there would be no attempt to recover it!
Once the Money Pit was sealed (air locked at level 8) and back filled it was never intended to be used again.
The Freemasons had built a circular spiral tunnel off of level 9 (105 foot mark) (shown in John Whitney Lewis’s engineering diagrams) to cart the treasure up above the water table and into their Treasure Vault.
This Treasure Vault is located approximately 500 feet North West of the Money Pit.
I'm not sure that I understand. They trapped it after the treasure was removed?
The treasure was carted down the Money Pit and then transported up the spiral tunnel to the Treasure Vault.
Once this was accomplished they had no further need of the Money Pit - Only as a booby trapped diversion!
Understood.
How was it brought out of the vault later?
How have you convinced them this is better than Al Capones safe?Ok, this theory is way out there! So to prove the theory, the brothers dig down twenty feet to find on empty vault!
Ok, this theory is way out there! So to prove the theory, the brothers dig down twenty feet to find on empty vault!
I am afraid I must side with the skeptics on this one... You have just gone too far with your theorizing... the brothers are treasure hunters and without a promise of actual treasure there is no incentive to buy into this whimsical theory!Sir Francis Bacon did say it best "There are far greater riches than silver and gold and that would be knowledge"
The empty Treasure Vault would be the concrete proof of the Freemasons plan for Oak Island and could show how this history changed America.
In 1762ad Oak Island was totally under the control of the British with their main fleet located in Halifax.
The French no longer had dominion over any part of Canada.
The Mi'kmaw were having skirmishes with settlers but an armada of 10 war ships on oak Island would have been no problem for the Freemasons to handle any encounters.
In 1795 when the three treasure seekers found the Money Pit they described the island as pretty much deserted.
This was also the time the Freemasons returned for their treasure due to the great influx of British Loyalist from America settling in Nova Scotia.