CurbdiggerCarl57 said:
Wow, GG, really grasping at straws, aren't we? If a 70 year old, 1940's pulp magazine cover by a renown (by some) artist truly offends you, I'd hate to see what's hanging on your wall. Now if any of the fine woman that detect and post are offended, drop me a pm, and I'll be more than happy to change my avatar.
Besides, she isn't naked, she has an almost diaphanous covering of the finest silk.
Look closer, no closer, there ya go!
Carl
It was sexist in the 40's and it's sexist now, and inappropriate for use as an avatar on a family website, in my opinion.
And it speaks to the point I was trying to make, concerning you wanting to police Treasurenet according to YOUR standards. (
"A. Doing my best to get certain people banned for their homophobic, racial, or sexist comments and beliefs, and...")
I also believe the Mods are quite capable of handling any situation on their own, without your help.
(
"B. Making the Mods realize that the site reflected poorly on the otherwise sane detecting community, and...")
As far as the pictures hanging on my walls are concerned, they are definately not sexist pulp fiction art designed to stimulate prurient interests.
Now as a teenager, well..........
GG~